[go: up one dir, main page]
Jump to content

Runway status lights

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Runway Status Lighting (RWSL) activated at San Diego International Airport
Runway Status Lighting (RWSL) activated at San Diego International Airport

Runway Status Lights (RWSL) are a visual alerting system installed in some airport taxiways and runways for the purpose of collision-avoidance. When illuminated, red high-intensity LEDs indicate the presence of another vehicle either departing, occupying, or landing on an active runway. RWSL systems are fully-automated and intended to alert aircrews and ground vehicle operators of a potential runway incursion hazard. They operate as an additional layer of safety, independent of human-issued air traffic control clearances.[1]

The system works by processing traffic position and movement data generated by transponders aboard aircraft and airside ground-vehicles such as aircraft rescue and firefighting (ARFF) units, aircraft tugs, and snow-clearing equipment. That data is concentrated by Airport Surface Detection Equipment (ASDE) or Airport Surface Surveillance Capability (ASSC) systems and fed to a path-predicting computer algorithm. If potential traffic conflicts are detected, the appropriate lights are automatically turned on or off according to the system's control logic.

Background

[edit]

At all airports with air-traffic-control towers, the movement of airside vehicles is coordinated by controllers who ensure efficient and safe operation through the use of clearances and separation standards.[2] With few exceptions (like an aircraft occupying a runway under a "line up and wait" clearance), an active runway is typically used by only one entity at a time. When an unauthorized person or vehicle enters a runway, whether intentional or accidental, the conflict is known as a runway incursion.[3] Many notable aviation accidents and incidents have been caused by such a scenario, including the Tenerife airport disaster, which remains the deadliest airplane accident in history.

RWSL Operational Concept

By the mid-1980s, runway incursion prevention began to attract special attention from aviation authorities, especially in the United States. After several high-profile accidents including Eastern Airlines 111 and the 1991 Los Angeles airport runway collision, the National Transportation Safety Board highlighted the need to find new technologies that could address the issue. In 1991, the NTSB issued a formal safety recommendation that the directed the FAA to develop "an alternate, cost effective, system to bring controller and pilot attention to pending runway incursions in time to prevent ground collisions."[4]

Development on RWSL began as early as 1992 by Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Lincoln Laboratory. According to an FAA statement, the system was to include "lights, positioned at the edge of the runway so that they would be visible from aircraft cockpits at the runway entrances, [that] would be activated when sensors notified the system of aircraft on approach or aircraft accelerating and decelerating on the runway."[5] The initial proof-of-concept began in 1992 at Boston's Logan International Airport with a model-board driven by algorithms processing inputs from marine-band radar and the Automated Radar Terminal System (ARTS). After proceeding with installation of over 170 lights in the real-world environment and collecting data across 8,298 aircraft operations, the system was determined to be feasible and successful at meeting its objectives. During the proof-of-concept, the RWSL achieved over 98% agreement with ATC-issued instructions.[6]

In 2010, FAA approved funding to install RWSL at 23 airports from fiscal year 2011 to fiscal year 2016 at a cost of $327 million.[7]

Components

[edit]
Takeoff Hold Light (THL) installed in a taxiway
Runway entrance light (REL) installed in a taxiway

Two subsystems, the RWSL Processor and the Field Lighting System (FLS), work together to automatically illuminate and extinguish the in-pavement lights. The processor uses surveillance data to analyze real-time airport surface operations. The FLS provides the physical interface from the processor to the runway lights.

  • RWSL Processor
  • Field Lighting System (FLS)
    • Runway Entrance Lights (REL): Red unidirectional lights along taxiway centerlines entering a runway.
    • Takeoff Hold Lights (THL): Red unidirectional lights in a double-longitudinal row, located parallel to runway centerline lighting.
    • Runway Intersection Lights (RIL): Similar to THLs, but located on a runway, prior to intersection with another runway.

On taxiways, Runway Entrance Lights (RELs) show that runways are not safe to enter or cross. On runways, Takeoff Hold Lights (THLs) show pilots that it is not yet safe to begin their takeoff.[8]

Deployment

[edit]

As of November 2022 the FAA has RWSL systems in operation at twenty US airports:[9]

As of 2016, Eurocontrol had deployed RWSL at one facility; Charles de Gaulle Airport in Paris.[10]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Runway Status Lights: Protecting aircraft when they are most vulnerable" (PDF). LabNotes: News from Around Lincoln Laboratory. 19 (1): 9–12. 2012. Retrieved 2021-05-29 – via Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  2. ^ "Aeronautical Information Manual - Chapter 4: ATC Clearances and Aircraft Separation" (3 ed.). Federal Aviation Administration. December 31, 2020. Retrieved May 28, 2021.
  3. ^ "Runway Incursions". www.faa.gov. Retrieved 2021-05-28.
  4. ^ Kolstad, James (1991-06-12). Safety Recommendation: 1991-06-12 (PDF). Washington, D.C.: National Transportation Safety Board. p. 8. Retrieved 2021-05-29.
  5. ^ Hall, Jim (2000-07-06). Safety Recommendation - 2000-07-06 (PDF). National Transportation Safety Board. Retrieved 2021-05-29.
  6. ^ Edwards, Vern; Daskalakis, A.C.; Oswald, L.J.; Brading, John; Warren, Ronald; Dawes, Ned; Ubnoske, Mike (1998). Runway Status Light Evaluation Report. Cambridge, MA: US Department of Transportation. pp. xvii–xx. Retrieved 2021-05-29.
  7. ^ Hampton, Matthew (June 23, 2014). "FAA Operational and Programmatic Deficiencies Impede Integration of Runway Safety Technologies" (PDF). US Department of Transportation. Retrieved May 28, 2021.
  8. ^ RUNWAY STATUS LIGHTS SYSTEM: Engineering Brief #64D (PDF). Federal Aviation Administration. 2011-05-09. Retrieved 2021-05-29.
  9. ^ "Runway Status Lights". www.faa.gov. Retrieved 2021-11-20.
  10. ^ European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Incursions (EAPPRI 3.0) (PDF) (1 ed.). Eurocontrol. 2017-11-20. p. 136. Retrieved 2021-05-30.

Further reading

[edit]
  • Mouawad, Jad. "Safer Flights, But Risk Lurks on the Runway." New York Times. New York Times, 24 Sept 2012. Web. 5 Oct. 2012.
  • Kaiser, Kimberly. "San Diego Int'l Switches to LED Runway Status Lights." Airport Improvement Magazine. Chapel Road Communications, LLC, May 2012. Web. 5 Oct 2012.
  • Gersema, Emma. "Phoenix Sky Harbor, Other Airports Get Safety Upgrades." Azcentral.com. Azcentral.com, 26 May 2012. Web. 5 Oct 2012.
  • Turner, Aimee. "LAX Runway Status Lighting Advances." Airtrafficmanagement.net. Key Publishing Ltd Corporate, 9 May 2012. Web. 5 Oct 2012.
  • Aviation News Network. "Los Angeles, FAA To Advance Runway Lights Program." Aviation News Today. Aviationnews.net, 18 Apr 2012. Web. 5 Oct 2012.
  • Weikel, Dan. "More Runway Warning Lights Will Be Added at LAX to Increase Safety." Los Angeles Times. Tribune Company. 16 Apr 2012. Web. 5 Oct 2012.
  • Namowitz, Dan. "Real-Time Runway Status Alerts Coming." Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association Online. Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association. 28 Oct 2011. Web. 5 Oct 2012.
  • AeroSafety World Magazine. "Timing is Everything." AeroSafety World Magazine. Flight Safety Foundation. Sept 2008. Web. 5 Oct 2012.
  • Levin, Alan. "Runway Safety Has Pilots Seeing Red." USA Today. Garnett Co, Inc 24 Apr 2006. Web. 5 Oct 2012.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Runway_status_lights&oldid=1250778609"