English: Figure 2. Substage-by-substage pattern of extinction intensities of marine genera from Bambach’s (2006) analysis of Sepkoski’s compendium, showing the 18 local peaks Bambach defined as mass extinctions. The trajectory shows the pervasiveness of extinction inferred from Sepkoski’s data prior to attempts to compensate for the incompleteness of the fossil record (Figure 3). The higher temporal resolution used compared with Sepkoski’s analyses (Figure 1) suggests that the Capitanian extinction (peak 10) is distinct from the end-Permian extinction (peak 11, the Changhsingian), rather than just being the smearing back of the end-Permian extinction due to the Signor-Lipps effect as was initially thought.
Date
Source
“Forty Years Later: The Status of the ‘Big Five’ Mass Extinctions.” Cambridge Prisms: Extinction 1 (2023): e5. doi:10.1017/ext.2022.4.
to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
to remix – to adapt the work
Under the following conditions:
attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0CC BY 4.0 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 truetrue
Captions
Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents
Uploaded a work by Marshall, Charles R. from “Forty Years Later: The Status of the ‘Big Five’ Mass Extinctions.” Cambridge Prisms: Extinction 1 (2023): e5. doi:10.1017/ext.2022.4. with UploadWizard