User talk:Tokek/2009

Welcome to my user talk page. Click here to add new discussions.

• Talks older than 7 May 2006: User talk:Tokek/Archive 1
• 5/8/2006 — 12/31/2006: User talk:Tokek/2006
• 1/1/2007 — 12/31/2008: User talk:Tokek/2008

Do you know what is going on with the WP:SANDBOX? ₪₪₪—  李博杰  (Talk·contribs·email·guestbook·complaints) 14:53, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes.—Tokek (talk) 11:03, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The spelling of the character is right, because it is talking about the Japanese name. Putting the English name there would make no sense as the names then are not alike. This would be like changing the link from Furiizaa to Articuno in the Frieza article. The English names Articuno and Frieza have nothing in common. The Japanese names Furiizaa and Furiiza are alike. This is why those are the names mentioned. --Blake (talk) 00:59, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tokek, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of Dai Jiten - a page you tagged - because: Its a dictionary, and books are not usually speediy deletable. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. ϢereSpielChequers 13:34, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

In September you commented on the proposal to move Mac OS X Snow Leopard to its original title, Mac OS X v10.6. I believe that its current title is most appropriate, and have opened another proposal for Mac OS X v10.3, v10.4, and v10.5 to follow this new convention and be moved to Mac OS X Panther, Tiger, and Leopard, respectively. I'd like to establish a consensus on the subject, and since you were involved in the previous discussion on the subject, I thought you might like to offer an opinion here as well. There is only one vote other than my own so far, and I'd like to hear some more opinions rather than declare a consensus on this limited basis.

Thanks in advance. If you'd like to contact me, please do so on my user talk page or the proposal itself. —INTRIGUEBLUE (talk|contribs) 21:32, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the content as BLP protection, please do not edit war about this content. Please do not re add it without support at either the talkpage or the BLP noticeboard. Off2riorob (talk) 15:18, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that the default position for contentious disputed content in a BLP is out until resolved. Off2riorob (talk) 15:22, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the notice. I have just noticed your comments and I am very interested in hearing your opinion / arguments on the topic. I was in the middle of the process of adding a comment to the article's discussion page myself. —Tokek (talk) 15:30, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]