User talk:Tgeorgescu
What is New Age? Definition of New Age / definitions © Tudor Georgescu 2002, unless quotations are used:
New Age: the ensemble of thelemic doctrines; Religion: the ensemble of thelesmic doctrines.
Thelema: behaving anarchically; expressed by Aleister Crowley in The Book of the Law as "Do what you wilt is the whole law."; Thelesma: aware choice; expressed by Hermes Trismegistus in The Emerald Tablet as discrimination.
The message of New Age: "You don't think. You're an animal. That's good. Enjoy!"; The message of religion: "You don't think. You're an animal. That's evil. Wake up!".
Apparently in the other category: Anthroposophy, Grail's Movement, Jehovah's Witnesses and Mormonism.
Thelema is always the thelesma of another entity. This is proven by the New Age stance of renunciation to thinking, in search of a so-called peace of soul. Since good entities are not imposive, it follows that thelema is always evil. It is the displacement of personal will through the suggestions of another will. Its purpose is the entitive annihilation, and its consequences are anarchy and anomy.
The thelemic increment is the tiny and apparently innocent quantity of added thelema. On a longer period, the general decay becomes evident.
(Above thelesma means enabling personality and thelema means taking over a personality by giving it a twisted idea that it is able to do everything, with no consequences whatsoever).
Hello Tudor Georgescu, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you realize that by submiting your writing here, you are releasing it under the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows copying, redistribution and modification of your work by anyone. See Wikipedia:Copyrights for more details. -- Stephen Gilbert 15:03 Dec 23, 2002 (UTC)
I quote from reiser4-for-2.6.19.patch by Laurent Riffard: tgeorgescu
"Further licensing options are available for commercial and/or other interests directly from Hans Reiser: reiser@namesys.com. If you interpret the GPL as not allowing those additional licensing options, you read it wrongly, and Richard Stallman agrees with me, when carefully read you can see that those restrictions on additional terms do not apply to the owner of the copyright, and my interpretation of this shall govern for this license." tgeorgescu
I quote from http://www.benedict.com/Info/Law/What.aspx : tgeorgescu
"Copyright protects expression. The Copyright Act of 1976 states that the items of expression can include literary, dramatic, and musical works; pantomimes and choreography; pictorial, graphic and sculptural works; audio-visual works; sound recordings; and architectural works. An original expression is eligible for copyright protection as soon as it is fixed in a tangible form." tgeorgescu
"Consequently, almost any original expression that is fixed in a tangible form is protected as soon as it is expressed. For example, a graphic created in Photoshop is protected as soon as the file is saved to disk. This Web page was protected as soon as I stopped typing and saved the .html file." tgeorgescu
On GFDL, I quote http://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl.txt : tgeorgescu
"The purpose of this License is to make a manual, textbook, or other functional and useful document "free" in the sense of freedom: to assure everyone the effective freedom to copy and redistribute it, with or without modifying it, either commercially or noncommercially. Secondarily, this License preserves for the author and publisher a way to get credit for their work, while not being considered responsible for modifications made by others." tgeorgescu
So, if somebody modifies my work so that violence is being suggested, I am not responsible for that. But, I maintain the authorship of the text I wrote, even if it is freely available for everybody to read and comment it. Naturally, I don't charge money for reading it. tgeorgescu
Btw, I don't mind that people copy and/or re-write what I write. According to my guru, one writes something down precisely because he/she wants everybody else to do whatever they please with his/her written words. E.g., the Bible has been mocked in innumerable ways, the same can be said of Shakespeare or Plato. The noble words of Socrates were raw matter for Aristofanes' scorn. And for Nietzsche's contempt. So, by writing something down, one consents that this is a pearl (if indeed a pearl) offered to the swines. So, it is understandable that esoteric groups are fond of secrecy, because they do not want their pearls to go to the swines. tgeorgescu
I saw you mention tektonics, this seems to be the only article using it and it looks to me as though its creator hasn't allowed any changes to it. The sources all appear to be fringe/minor sects, although there are a number of reliable sources for it, eg [1][2][3][4] And it doesn't mention Kenneth E. Hagin who seems to have developed it. Doug Weller talk 12:35, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
- WP:SPS may be cited for their own views as long as they pass WP:N (I don't know if that is the case there). I do not know much about Rhema, so in general I only edit articles I know something about. Tgeorgescu (talk) 12:38, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
- Which I'm not convinced they do. Anyway, I've tagged the article for RS, added the ones above to the talk page, added {{WikiProject Christianity}} and posted to that talk page. I don't blame you for not wanting to get involved. I'd argue that SPS need to pass WP:UNDUE, not simply notability or else fringe sources could be used more widely. Doug Weller talk 12:49, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Cucuteni-Trypillia culture
You pretend (probabil ti-ai pierdut ochelarii" that tha chapter/paragraf in question (Early period 4800-4000 BC) "does not say anything about 6500-5000 BC period". I can't guess if you are lying premeditate (like the PSD party), you you just can't read. I COPIED the text fron that paragraph, which clearly proves that you are LYING. Further more, in my comments I brought reliable sources to the table! What did you bring? Lies and empty words? To contradict the proven data with it? Obvious a PSD case.
HERE the paragraph text (only the begining of it): "The roots of Cucuteni-Trypillia culture can be found in the Starčevo-Körös-Criș and Vinča cultures of the 6th to 5th millennia,[8] with additional influence from the Bug-Dniester culture (6500-5000 BC).[22] During the early period of its existence (in the 5th millennium BC), the Cucuteni-Trypillia culture was also influenced by the Linear Pottery culture from the north..."
So "the paragraph text does not say 6500-5000 BC" ??????? ????????? ??????? Muntele (talk) 16:49, 12 November 2017 (UTC)