[go: up one dir, main page]

Jump to content

Talk:Protostome

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Vegaswikian (talk | contribs) at 19:38, 10 October 2010 (Requested move: No consensus to move). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconAnimals Start‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconProtostome is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Animals To-do:


Temporarily removed:

In both protostomes and deuterostomes, the embryo consists of a little ball of cells known as a blastula. Protostomes have their early cell divisions diagonal to the polar axis forming a spiral arrangement of cells; this is called spiral cleavage. A groups of cells move inward to form an opening called the blastophore, which in protostomes develops into the mouth.

Protostomes have a determinate cleavage: the fate of how each embryonic cell will turn out to be or function is typically fixed very early; the first four cells are separate and each will develop into a fixed quarter of the larva. If a cell is removed from the blastula, a limb might not form, for the other cells don't compensate. Protostomes are schizocoely, where the mesoderm splits and the split widens into a cavity that becomes the coelom.

This is because it doesn't seem accurate. Although many protostomes have spiral cleavage, it's not universal to the group, and in particular is rare among the Ecdysozoa. I'm not sure about the rest, but I thought it worth erring on the side of caution. Josh

I am curious to know what evidence there is for the assertion that it appears that the protostomes evolved from the deuterostomes, and that therefore protostomy is the derived condition. ???

 You're correct, protostomes did not evolve from deuterostomes, I will remove this now.

Simplify

Just a sugestion but could you, perphaps change this page so that the rest of the world can understand it? Now I'm a reasonablly bright person, but this article is like reading a foreign language. I'm all for having accurate and informative pages, but the only person that could read this would be people with degrees in Biology, and people with degrees in Biology do not need to look this stuff up on Wikipedia. Its just a suggesstion but consider it. Antarticstargate 04:56, 18 March 2007 (UTC)AntarticstargateAntarticstargate 04:56, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What about cnidarians?

I've looked under both protostome and deuterostome, and there is no mention of the cnidarians. Do they fit under either, or neither? They have a mouth, but some don't have an anus, so they can't be deuterostomes. Even so, what is it called when the blastopore becomes both the mouth and the anus? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.210.91.137 (talk) 17:01:50, August 19, 2007 (UTC)


Cnidarians are Acoelomates, they do not possess a coelom and thus are neither protostomes nor deuterostomes. Platyhelminthes are also Acoelomates so I am not sure they can be categorized as protostomes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.141.2.167 (talk) 21:01, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removed section

I removed this section, it is not right:

subphylum of protostomes

  • spincula
  • echiura
  • pogonophora
  • pentastomida
  • onychophora
  • tardigrada

--Dj Capricorn (talk) 17:00, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

embryonic development

some diagrams on the embryonic development of protostomes vs. deuterostomes would be a nice addition. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.32.146.72 (talk) 21:44, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. It is unclear what the alternative theories are. Picture = 1,000 words. And articles shouldn't be afraid to state the "obvious" general points (relating e.g to germ layers), even if they occur elsewhere - children read wikipedia looking for an introductory orientation to subjects; if they go away feeling they understand, they may, with luck, go on to spend a life studying the subject. They should be given a "good in" rather than put off with unclear explanations. Tsinfandel (talk) 22:29, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Please add sources in the appropriate sections:

Common to protostomes and deuterostomes

Evolution of protostomes

Modern protostomes

-- Philcha (talk) 15:33, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Terminology

Why does the Protostome article refer to the group as a clade, but the Deuterostome article refers to it's group as a superphylum? --Dante Alighieri | Talk 20:38, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some sources say deuterostome is the original condition of bilaterians, and thus a paraphyletic group that includes protostome. --Philcha (talk) 02:37, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:38, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ProtostomeProtostomia — Should be moved to the scientific name, more encyclopedic. --Whoop whoop pull up (talk) 12:59, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose - protostome is a widely used common name for this clade.  — Amakuru (talk) 18:30, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - How is that name more encyclopedic? You're just taking the current name and making it (the old, non "s" version of its) plural. Protostome and protostomes are the scientific names for it and are definitely more commonly used than protostomia. Also plurals in article titles are generally supposed to be avoided where possible. --WikiDonn (talk) 19:50, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. "Protostomia" would be intellectual snobbery. "Protosome" and its plural "protosomes" can be more precise than "protostomia", which has no grammatical number. --Philcha (talk) 06:55, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.