Talk:Laos Memorial

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Stub

This article has been rated as Stub-class on the project's quality scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Military memorials and cemeteries task force

United States Stub‑class Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Neutrality

The sentence that itches me is this one:

" This day marks a special day in Hmong/Mong history because it was the first time that the United States Government publicly recognized the deeds of these brave soldiers who were so loyal to the United States and its ideals of freedom. "

It tends to tell readers what to think about this war, that it was necessarily a good thing. This text should only redirect readers to the Secret War article, where editors can elaborate on the subject. I would delete that last sentence. Colocho 03:00, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tried to re-word the sentence. --MarsRover 04:17, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Much of this article is a soapbox about the Secret War, etc, rather than about the memorial itself. Other parts are very repetitive. It needs an overhaul! Mobi Ditch (talk) 23:15, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Colocho and MarsRover: Can you point out a WP policy that allows you to alter a quotation because it doesn't suit you?Georgejdorner (talk) 21:58, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Humm... did you bother to look at what we changed 12 years ago? It wasn't a quotation. And the relative policy is WP:PEACOCK. --MarsRover (talk) 07:48, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Laos Memorial. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:38, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]