Talk:Corinna
This article is a current featured article candidate. A featured article should exemplify Wikipedia's best work, and is therefore expected to meet the criteria. Please feel free to After one of the FAC coordinators promotes the article or archives the nomination, a bot will update the nomination page and article talk page. Do not manually update the {{Article history}} template when the FAC closes. |
Corinna (final version) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which on 10 May 2022 was archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
Corinna has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: September 12, 2019. (Reviewed version). |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Bot-generated content
A computerised algorithm has generated a version of this page using data obtained from AlgaeBase. You may be able to incorporate elements into the current article. Alternatively, it may be appropriate to create a new page at Corinna (alga). Anybot (contact operator) 23:36, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Corinna/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Kingsif (talk · contribs) 07:19, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'll be reviewing this, I should be posting comments tomorrow! Kingsif (talk) 07:19, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Style
- Lead good length for article
- Very well written in a considered voice - neutral but interesting
- Informative in a tone appropriate for subject
- Good progression of information through paragraphs and sections
- Not much to say as it is consistently well-written:
- there are no visible issues with grammar
- language is good and voice is strong
- reads well throughout
- Very well done
- Pass
Coverage
- Lead good length, comprehensive on the main issues regarding the subject which also double as a summary of her biography
- Concise with good depth on the subject and her works; additional information included contextualizes the subject and is only to the article's benefit
- Would perhaps question if there's more comparison with Sappho/other Greek female poets? There's the Smyth note in the lead and the Skinner note on women's poetry, but if her work is of interest because she is one of few female poets with preserved work, is there not more on the comparisons?
- Looking through the edit history, more on this was added shortly before nom; with such good research in the article I am assuming if there was more available on comparisons it would have been added then.
- Pass
Illustration
- Multiple good quality images.
- Satisfactory for article length
- Pass
Neutrality
- weighs opinions of the bio well
- and views of the poetry and others' opinions also neutral
- Pass
Stability
- No major changes since nom
- Other big changes in October '18 or earlier
- Pass
Verifiability
- Many high quality sources.
- Pass
Copyright
- Looks clean
- Pass
Overall
- Exceptionally good article. Kingsif (talk) 18:05, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Thanks to Caeciliusinhorto
...for all the work you have done improving this article. Sweet6970 (talk) 15:01, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Request
@Caeciliusinhorto: The 2nd para of Life has One of the first scholars to question this was Edgar Lobel in 1930,[11] who concluded that there is no reason to believe that she the orthography used on the Berlin papyrus, on which fragments of two of her poems are preserved.
There’s something missing here – can you clarify, please? Sweet6970 (talk) 10:43, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Oops, copyediting error! Fixed it. Thanks for pointing it out Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 10:45, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks. Sweet6970 (talk) 10:47, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Wikipedia featured article candidates
- Old requests for peer review
- Wikipedia good articles
- Language and literature good articles
- GA-Class biography articles
- GA-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Arts and entertainment work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- GA-Class Classical Greece and Rome articles
- Mid-importance Classical Greece and Rome articles
- All WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome pages
- GA-Class Poetry articles
- Low-importance Poetry articles
- WikiProject Poetry articles
- GA-Class Women writers articles
- Low-importance Women writers articles
- WikiProject Women articles
- WikiProject Women writers articles
- GA-Class Greek articles
- Low-importance Greek articles
- WikiProject Greece general articles
- All WikiProject Greece pages
- GA-Class Women's History articles
- Low-importance Women's History articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women's History articles