Wikibooks talk:Be bold
Add topic Archives |
|---|
| : January 2007 |
Be Bold
[edit source]This guideline proposal is static now, in recent times it only got tweaked a bit and I think to the best and to make it clearer. I archived previous post threads about making it a policy or a guideline (and they are important as some users may still have problems making a distinction on the two), I think the argument to make it a guideline won and is stated as much on the draft any one has any other point we should consider before we make a decission on this ?
I have suggested that User:Robert Horning puts it through the motions he proposed on the [Wikibooks:Staff lounge/Chat #Moving on policies] as a test run sense no other way is defined as standard. --Panic 18:43, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
- I have created a basic voting page for this to become a formal guideline here: Wikibooks:Policies and guidelines/Vote/Be Bold
- I think this is rather non-controvercial, and certainly need to get some sort of formal acceptance. --Rob Horning 20:12, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
- Does Wikipedia itself have the be bold ( or similiar) guideline? ChessCreator (talk) 14:29, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
- Yes they do; see here. Νεοπτόλεμος 14:32, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks ChessCreator (talk) 15:35, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
- Yes they do; see here. Νεοπτόλεμος 14:32, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Shortcut
[edit source]The shortcut to this page is WB:BOLD, but WP:BB is used for the same policy on Wikipedia. Since WB:BB goes to the Bulletin Board, I'm going to put a link on the Bulletin Board so that Wikipedibookians looking for this page might more easily find it. Νεοπτόλεμος 15:47, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
- As long as we don't have a hyperactive deletionist kill the redirects, that shouldn't be a problem. And yes, there has been massive deletion of redirects in the past that I won't go into. Since many wikipedians are more familiar with the "WP:" psuedoprefix, I think this is a good idea. --Rob Horning (talk) 16:01, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Wikijunior
[edit source]Shouldn't there be a Wikijunior version, considering that there is a link to this page on the main Wikijunior page? That way, it would be easier to understand. This is mainly easy to understand, but it could be simplified some more to be easier for them. (Check my Wikipedia user page.) B-a-b (talk) 00:34, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Solo uso mi libre criterio
[edit source]Gracias por su apoyo 201.175.242.242 (discuss) 23:22, 20 August 2022 (UTC)