Talk:snark

If you follow the wiki references, snark --> snide --> "without humor". This is incorrect. As used on the 'net, "good" snark is always witty, or at least cleverly written.

While true that Wikipedia has an article on "snark" (as highlighted in this article), it is a disambig page which points here as far as this meaning of the word is concerned. Seems pointless to me to have the link from here to there; it just tells the reader the same thing over again. Is it policy to have a link whenever Wikipedia has an article? 4.143.242.146 05:04, 30 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

On the usage of "snarking" in the year 1866: https://www.academia.edu/10407335/Scratching_or_Scranching_is_not_quite_like_Snarking_or_Gnashing_1866_ --93.204.119.177 20:10, 13 May 2016 (UTC)Reply