मेष
Hindi
Etymology
From (deprecated template usage) [etyl] Sanskrit मेष.
Noun
मेष • (meṣ) m (Urdu spelling میش)
Sanskrit
Etymology
From (deprecated template usage) [etyl] Proto-Indo-European Template:term/t. Cognates include Persian (deprecated template usage) میش (meš), Old Irish (deprecated template usage) meiss and Old Prussian (deprecated template usage) moasis.
Noun
मेष • (meṣá) stem, m
- ram, sheep (in the older language applied also to a fleece or anything woollen)
- RV 1.52.1a
- तयं सु मेषं महया सवर्विदं शतं यस्य सुभ्वः साकमीरते |
- अत्यं न वाजं हवनस्यदं रथमेन्द्रं वव्र्त्यामवसे सुव्र्क्तिभिः ||
- Template:unicode |
- Template:unicode ||
- I GLORIFY that Ram who finds the light of heaven, whose hundred nobly-natured ones go forth with him.
- With hymns may I turn hither Indra to mine aid,—the Car which like a strong steed hasteth to the call.
- RV 1.52.1a
- the sign of the zodiac Aries or the first arc of 30 degrees in a circle
- (deprecated template usage) (botany) a species of plant
- name of a particular demon
Declension
| Masculine a-stem declension of मेष | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Nom. sg. | मेषः (meṣaḥ) | ||
| Gen. sg. | मेषस्य (meṣasya) | ||
| Singular | Dual | Plural | |
| Nominative | मेषः (meṣaḥ) | मेषौ (meṣau) | मेषाः (meṣāḥ) |
| Vocative | मेष (meṣa) | मेषौ (meṣau) | मेषाः (meṣāḥ) |
| Accusative | मेषम् (meṣam) | मेषौ (meṣau) | मेषान् (meṣān) |
| Instrumental | मेषेण (meṣeṇa) | मेषाभ्याम् (meṣābhyām) | मेषैः (meṣaiḥ) |
| Dative | मेषाय (meṣāya) | मेषाभ्याम् (meṣābhyām) | मेषेभ्यः (meṣebhyaḥ) |
| Ablative | मेषात् (meṣāt) | मेषाभ्याम् (meṣābhyām) | मेषेभ्यः (meṣebhyaḥ) |
| Genitive | मेषस्य (meṣasya) | मेषयोः (meṣayoḥ) | मेषाणाम् (meṣāṇām) |
| Locative | मेषे (meṣe) | मेषयोः (meṣayoḥ) | मेषेषु (meṣeṣu) |
References
- Monier Williams (1899) “मेष”, in A Sanskrit–English Dictionary, […], new edition, Oxford: At the Clarendon Press, →OCLC, page 0833.
- Arthur Anthony Macdonell (1893) “मेष”, in A practical Sanskrit dictionary with transliteration, accentuation, and etymological analysis throughout, London: Oxford University Press, page 235