Which measures of time preference best predict outcomes: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment
Stephen Burks,
Jeffrey Carpenter,
Lorenz Götte and
Aldo Rustichini
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Lorenz Goette
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2012, vol. 84, issue 1, 308-320
Abstract:
Economists and psychologists have devised numerous instruments to measure time preferences and have generated a rich literature examining the extent to which time preferences predict important outcomes; however, we still do not know which measures work best. With the help of a large sample of non-student participants and administrative data on outcomes, we gather four different time preference measures and test the extent to which they predict both on their own and when they are all forced to compete head-to-head. Our results suggest that the now familiar (β, δ) formulation of present bias and exponential discounting predicts best, especially when both parameters are used.
Keywords: Time preference; Impatience; Discounting; Present bias; Field experiment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C93 D90 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (73)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268112000674
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
Working Paper: Which Measures of Time Preference Best Predict Outcomes? Evidence from a Large-Scale Field Experiment (2011)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:84:y:2012:i:1:p:308-320
DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2012.03.012
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization is currently edited by Houser, D. and Puzzello, D.
More articles in Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().