User talk:Sneeuwschaap

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Sneeuwschaap!

Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文（台灣）‎ | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 17:31, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.Here there are hundreds of images about Shadows What is the problem — Preceding unsigned comment added by ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk • contribs)

Hello. Look, please, at Commons:Project scope: the project needs only images with some educational value. And compare the quality of the images which I proposed to delete and the other images in their categories. Stas (talk) 20:00, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо вам, что вы правиль классификацию некоторых моих загруженных фотографий.--Dendrofil (talk) 19:34, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Рад помочь!-) Stas (talk) 19:43, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've requested at COM:AN that your various moon related DRs be rolled up into a Commons:Deletion requests/Mass deletion request. The section is 'Moon DRs'. Ultra7 (talk) 13:39, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the message. Maybe, one single request will be more easy to work with. On the other hand, the images are rather different. Stas (talk) 22:18, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm really sorry for the Langmuir category thing. But thanks for putting up with me and I learned something from you. So thank you. EChastain (talk) 23:47, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No problem at all, colleague, no reason for apology! This categorization thing is not very important at all. Thank you for a constructive dialog! Cheers, Stas (talk) 00:57, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Stas. I revert your image because it's too small, the image needs to be full resolution as original file, keep this image. Thanks. :) --Jcpag2012 (a.k.a. John Carlo) from Wikimedia Commons 00:48, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi Jcpag2012. Look please at my comment there. Why the image needs to have the same resolution as original file? This is a false resolution, it does not correspond to the real detalization. The big image is senselessly stretched, and it does not have more details than the small image. You can take any picture and stretch it 10, 100 or 1000 times, but it would not become better. No new details will appear there. It will become more bulky (=worse), and that's all. And I specially choosed for the diminution the best interpolation algorithm, which reduced the moiré pattern most effectively. Size about several hundred pixels is the most adequate size for this photo. Even with such a small size it looks somewhat blurred.
• What is the sense of turning the north down? Position "north is upward" is definitely the standard one. Any other position will require a special comments for the readers. Stas (talk) 01:29, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Stas000D: keep my image, do not revert it again. Thanks. :) --Jcpag2012 (a.k.a. John Carlo) from Wikimedia Commons 02:17, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jcpag2012: Why? New image is definitely worse. If you still think that it has any sense, you can upload it under an other name. And don't forget about a comment about the orientation, otherwise the picture will be misleading. Stas (talk) 02:36, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Stas000D: Not worse, but it's good, it's the same with high resolution from image link. Do not revert image again, thanks. :) --Jcpag2012 (a.k.a. John Carlo) from Wikimedia Commons 02:43, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why it needs to have the same false "high resolution" as the original? What's the sense of additional megapixels, if they do not give more details? Why we need to keep the image in a half-baked condition? Stas (talk) 13:47, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To both of you, I've reverted to the last good version of this image. I'll be leaving a strongly worded message on Jcpag2012's talk page. — Huntster (t @ c) 15:51, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Elgaria kingii juvenile.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Hop on Bananas (talk) 22:27, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Hop on Bananas (talk) 23:03, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Hop on Bananas: I don't see the necessity to discuss the same file in 2 DRs, but if so, you must link them with each other. Stas (talk) 00:47, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

العربيَّة ∙ Deutsch ∙ español ∙ English ∙ français ∙ português ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（台灣）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hi Stas000D, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

• Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
• Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
• Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

lNeverCry 21:43, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sneeuwschaap, Thank you for your message. Indeed, it can also be another format if desired. There is unfortunately no set template on the Commons as far as I know. Some uses comma, others use brackets, it's all very uneven unfortunately. I thought the format that I chose made most sense, but am open for suggestions how to make it better of course. Gryffindor (talk) _Category:Ostriiky_(Bila_Tserkva_Raion)" class="ext-discussiontools-init-timestamplink">11:57, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't insist on any particular format too. Sneeuwschaap (talk) 02:19, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Sneeuwschaap, that is a Dutch word meaning "Снежный баран" :) Lotje (talk) 13:59, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, they wrote a page about me Sneeuwschaap (talk) 21:32, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb zu WikiDaheim 2018! Von Ende Juli bis Anfang Oktober wurden so insgesamt mehr als 14.000 Bilder hochgeladen und viele Orte in Österreich in der Wikipedia und anderen Projekten mit neuen Bildern versehen, was nur dank der vielen Beiträge wie Deinen möglich war. Aus rund 500 von einer Vorjury ausgewählten Bildern hat nun eine Jury die Preisträger-Fotos dieses Jahres gewählt: Commons:WikiDaheim.

Übrigens: Wikimedia Österreich unterstützt Dich gerne bei Deinen Beiträgen auf Wikimedia Commons, beispielsweise mit Foto-Leihgeräten oder einem Foto-Software-Stipendium. Einen Überblick über die Unterstützungsmöglichkeiten findest Du auf Wikipedia:Förderung.

Mit herzlichem Gruß, für das Team von WikiDaheim, Manfred Werner (WMAT) (talk) 18:14, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

	The Special Barnstar
	This barnstar is awarded you for renaming as suggested by me and replacing it with the related article on English Wikipedia. JogiAsad (talk) 23:56, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I requested the renaming of the file File:Kunsthistorisches_Museum,Helios,Seitenansicht.JPG to File:Naturhistorisches_Museum,Helios,Seitenansicht.jpg. Unfortunately in the meantime I uploaded a different file with this name which should actually be File:Naturhistorisches_Museum,Helios,Vorderansicht.jpg. I requested to rename the false „Seitenansicht“ to „Vorderansicht“ which is not possible because you created a redirection from „Seitenansicht“ to „Vorderansicht“. Please help me out, thank you very much, Manuela (Diskussion) 04:17, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi! For this renaming, you need help from an administrator. Or you can request renaming into some non-occupied name (for example, add spaces after commas), and I will be able to perform it. Sneeuwschaap (talk) 06:10, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Take care when you rename files, please. This one removes information, and gives to the file a more generic name (which would fit File:Tibet-BOOK cover of Lhasa and its mysteries.jpg better). Do not be afraid of declining improper requests! --Ruthven (msg) 08:00, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for making the name more appropriate. I renamed the file bearing in mind Commons:FR#FR1 and an assumption that the uploader wants to adhere to some his proper naming system (remembering that in other cases his requests were correct), but now I see that it was an erroneous request inserted together with the file uploading. Sneeuwschaap (talk) 09:05, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Вітаю! Я намагаюсь категоризувати зображення, що стосуються Миколаївської області. Низка таких фотографій була завантажена User:Ириниан. Очевидно, на них зображено одне село Новоселівка Миколаївської області. Таких сіл в області декілька і, на жаль, незрозуміло, яке саме з них на цих світлинах. Я помітив, що один з цих файлів Ви віднесли до Миколаївського району (Revision #205766332). Ви впевнені, що це Новоселівка Миколаївського району? --Mr.Rosewater (talk) 08:50, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Вітаю, колего! До таких речей я намагаюсь ставитися уважно і, ймовірно, тоді мені здалося, що ідентифікація достатньо надійна — але звідки я це взяв два з половиною роки тому, вже геть не знаю. Якщо ніяких зачіпок не знайдеться, треба буде перенести файл до невизначених. Ну й варто написати завантажувачу — хоч імовірність відповіді й невелика, праці теж небагато. Sneeuwschaap (talk) 09:04, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ви знаєте, я погуглив і, здається, знайшов зачіпочку. Виявилось, в селі є одна незвичайна будівля – Костел cв. Антонія Падуанського. Отут є його якісні зображення. На фотках, що завантажені User:Ириниан, мені здається, ця будівля присутня тут (у правому верхньому куті) і тут (у лівому верхньому куті). Подивіться й Ви, будь ласка, бо якість фоток тут не дуже висока і я не впевнений. --Mr.Rosewater (talk) 13:08, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Здається, розпізнав. Ці корівники зі ставком звідси: Google, Yandex, вид із півдня. Цей колодязь явно ось тут і знятий із південного заходу. Це (воно ж великим планом) знято звідси, розпізнається і розвалюха праворуч, і автобусна зупинка ліворуч, і якийсь яскравий дах за нею, і костел тоді має бути якраз там, де Ви припустили (на гуглокарті він відмічений як кірха). Sneeuwschaap (talk) 20:49, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please, do not add double (redundant) Categories. I deleted your double (redundant) Categories in:

• File:Bike path, Yakutov Park (1).jpg, File:Yakutov Park, 06.08.2019.jpg, File:Bike path, Yakutov Park (3).jpg, File:Bike path, Yakutov Park (2).jpg, File:Bike path, Yakutov Park (2).jpg, File:Bike path, Yakutov Park (1).jpg - only Category:Yakutov Park, Ufa
• File:Russian Revolution and Civil War monument, Ufa.jpg - only Category:Yakutov Park, Ufa and Category:Monuments and memorials in Ufa (questionable)
• File:Lenin Street, Ufa, (06.08.2019).jpg - - only Category:Lenin Street, Ufa

Thank you for understanding & Good time of day!--Ayratayrat (talk) 09:09, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What? Sneeuwschaap (talk) 16:04, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RMaung (WMF) 01:12, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RMaung (WMF) 15:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RMaung (WMF) 20:01, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

День добрый. Рокитных может быть и много, но Церковь Рождества Богородицы есть только в одном Рокитном, поэтому уточнение район/область не нужно. Спасибо. --Mitte27 (talk) 16:53, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Прежде чем устраивать войну правок, задайтесь вопросом: как убедиться, что во всех этих населённых пунктах нет и не будет ни одной другой церкви Рождества Богородицы. Учитывая, что это одно из самых популярных в стране посвящений церквей. Буду очень признателен, если Вы не будете создавать предпосылки для возвращения хаоса, на разгребание которого я потратил не один месяц, и усложнять проверку категоризации файлов и категорий для тех, кто с этим работает. Спасибо. Sneeuwschaap (talk) 17:13, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Убедиться можно легко. Вбить в гугле и понять, что только в одном Рокитном есть Церковь Рождества Богородицы. --Mitte27 (talk) 17:20, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Вы серьёзно? Вы проработали 892 результата выдачи плюс считаете, что чего нет в Гугле, того нет и в реальности? Гуглежом убедиться в вашем утверждении невозможно. Оно с большой вероятностью верное, но проверить его намного труднее, чем поставить в название уточнение, а убедиться, что оно будет оставаться верным хотя бы в обозримом будущем, невозможно вообще. Можете не сомневаться, что как только в очередном Ракитном появится ещё одна церковь с таким названием, её снимки посыплются в эту же категорию и могут лежать там до второго пришествия. Как и значительная часть снимков церквей с любым названием во всех Ракитных. Половина тех, кто грузит свои снимки на Викисклад, имеет очень смутное представление о том, что они наснимали, и половина тех, кто это категоризует, работает не лучше. Чего ради создавать предпосылки для путаницы, когда массу проблем можно предупредить всего-навсего уточнением в названии категории? Sneeuwschaap (talk) 17:44, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Пока не существует второй церкви с таким же названием в любом другом Ракитном вполне очевидно, что уточнение не нужно. --Mitte27 (talk) 18:51, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

«Вполне очевидно» — это аргументация для своего личного сайта, а не для коллегиального проекта. Мне по приведённым мной причинам «вполне очевидно» противоположное. Обсуждайте, пожалуйста, предмет аргументированно, если уж он Вам так важен, что Вы устроили по этому поводу войну правок. Sneeuwschaap (talk) 19:20, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Если вы никак не докажите существование двух одинаковых цервей в разных Ракитных, то смысла в уточнении нет, иначе можно переименовывать все церкви с уточнением район/область, так как где-то, что-то может существовать. --Mitte27 (talk) 21:27, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Вы хотите убрать уточнение — вам и доказывать однозначность остатка. Смысл вам объяснён: и название «Ракитное», и название «церковь Рождества Богородицы» имеют частоту сильно выше средней. Произведение повышенных частот — не просто повышенное, а сильно повышенное. Sneeuwschaap (talk) 23:25, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ссылку на гугл я предоставил. Поиск показал, что в других Ракитных таких церквей нет. Если что-то было упущено, то покажите хоть одну и конец дискуссии. --Mitte27 (talk) 23:32, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Не ходите, пожалуйста, по кругу. Доказывать несуществование чего-либо ссылками на гугл с 9 страницами результатов смехотворно. Кроме того, речь идёт не только о существовании таких церквей в современности, но и о вероятности их существования в будущем и прошлом. Вред от уточнения незначителен, а вероятность предупреждения ошибок здесь вполне реальна, в отличие от большинства случаев. Так чего ради идти войной на это конкретное уточнение? Зачесать всё под одну гребёнку и поудалять уточнения отовсюду всё равно не выйдет. Sneeuwschaap (talk) 00:02, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Другими словами: точной информации (не предположений, домыслов) о существовании сейчас или ранее таких церквей нет. Тогда необходимости в уточнении нет. --Mitte27 (talk) 00:08, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ru:ВП:НЕСЛЫШУ. Соображения, по которым уточнение в подобных случаях желательно, вам изложены яснее некуда. Их опровержения (а не субъективщины типа «тогда необходимости нет») с вашей стороны не последовало. Sneeuwschaap (talk) 08:56, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for renaming my Battlestein's image. --Jim Evans (talk) 02:26, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sneeuwschaap, is there any possibility to delete these redirectionsː [1] [2]? They are no longer useful and it has no sense to keep them. Thanks in advanceǃ--Veinticuatro de Jahén (talk) 22:53, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I do not have such possibility, but administrators do, try to ask them. Sneeuwschaap (talk) 22:56, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Russian shelling of Kharkiv, 28 February 2022.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

SCP-2000 14:42, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chernihiv, 28.02.2022 - State Emergency Service of Ukraine.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

SCP-2000 14:47, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File talk:Bitwa o drzwi.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: CSD G8 (page dependent on deleted or non-existent content) If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Hulged (talk) 07:20, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK, but why do you write me? I did not upload this file. Sneeuwschaap (talk) 07:44, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you didn't uploaded the file but you were the one who created this discussion page. --Hulged (talk) 08:13, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐ File:Shelling of Kharkiv regional state administration, 01 March 2022.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Вітання! Ваша думка: чи доцільно утворити нову гілку категорій щодо російсько-української війни за країнами на кшталт Category:World War I by country, Category:World War II by country? --Микола Василечко (talk) 16:45, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Вітаю, колего! Як на мене, доцільно. Якщо є навіть Category:Korean War by country з 21 підкатегорією. Sneeuwschaap (talk) 17:15, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://mine.dsns.gov.ua/ внизу под картой снаряды и их описание --PBKIHX (talk) 00:19, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Чудесно, только мне-то она зачем? Она должна быть на страницах описания ваших загрузок. В том числе для того, чтобы их не удалили, усомнившись в лицензионной чистоте. Sneeuwschaap (talk) 00:34, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ну если усомняться - тогда и предоставлю. А пока не хочу чтобы сами знаете-кто засирал карту с минами. PBKIHX (talk) 00:42, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐ File:Russian invasion (State Emergency Service of Ukraine, 28 February 2022).webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jakub Jankiewicz.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jakub T. Jankiewicz (talk) 09:50, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have no interest in deletion or keeping of this redirect. The redirect was made during renaming just because the file is 8 year old. Sneeuwschaap (talk) 09:56, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Форсування Сіверського Донця.jpg я забыл пароль от этого аккаунта и теперь могу редактировать только в пределах ВикиКоммонз))))) --PBKIHX (talk) 21:08, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Добавил. Sneeuwschaap (talk) 23:08, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rocket strike on a shopping center in Kremenchuk.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

The Quirky Kitty (talk) 13:49, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

These files had really bad names which polluted a lot of searches. Giving them better names was a major effort involving at least 7 file movers. Together you moved more than a thousand files. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 14:17, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Concrete shelter in Mykolaiv, 2022-11-04.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Concrete shelter in Mykolaiv, 2022-11-04.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 01:05, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(to the bot owner): the bot works incorrectly: it installed "NoLicense" tag half an hour after the license tag was created. Sneeuwschaap (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	The Minor barnstar
	For invaluable help with files and fixing my hurry. Thank you, colleague! Kisnaak (talk) 02:45, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Sneeuwschaap (talk) 03:24, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chaiky, Bucha Raion, 3 March 2022 (3).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

90.181.195.2 12:38, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bilenke (Odessa Oblast), evacuation of residents 3 March 2022 (1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

90.181.195.2 12:39, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bilenke (Odessa Oblast), evacuation of residents 3 March 2022 (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

90.181.195.2 12:39, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bilenke (Odessa Oblast), evacuation of residents 3 March 2022 (3).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

90.181.195.2 12:40, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bilenke (Odessa Oblast), evacuation of residents 3 March 2022 (4).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

90.181.195.2 12:40, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Collecting of Russian bombs in Kharkiv 4 March 2022 (07).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

90.181.195.2 12:41, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Collecting of Russian bombs in Kharkiv 4 March 2022 (10).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

90.181.195.2 12:42, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Explosive ordnance disposal in Mykolaiv, 14 March 2022 (01).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

90.181.195.2 12:42, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Explosive ordnance disposal in Mykolaiv, 14 March 2022 (02).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

90.181.195.2 12:43, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Explosive ordnance disposal in Mykolaiv, 14 March 2022 (03).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

90.181.195.2 12:43, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Storage building in Sumy after shelling during Russian invasion, 19 March 2022 (09).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

90.181.195.2 12:44, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Storage building in Sumy after shelling during Russian invasion, 19 March 2022 (10).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

90.181.195.2 12:44, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Storage building in Sumy after shelling during Russian invasion, 19 March 2022 (11).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

90.181.195.2 12:45, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chaiky, Bucha Raion, 3 March 2022 (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

90.181.195.2 12:45, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chaiky, Bucha Raion, 3 March 2022 (3).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

90.181.195.2 12:45, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐ File:Dnipro after Russian missile attack, 2023-01-14 (001).webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pour le chien de défense ukrainien Wikipédia:Le Bistro/29 janvier 2023 — Wikipédia (wikipedia.org)

Long Live Ukraina ! Mike Coppolano (talk) 09:12, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merci à vous! Sneeuwschaap (talk) 12:16, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pochodzenia po polsku ale nie mowie swietnie. Vivement que le monde soit débarassé de Poutine et de sa clique, Mike Coppolano (talk) 14:52, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I speak neither Polish nor French but superpower of Google Translate enables me to understand everything) Let's hope. Sneeuwschaap (talk) 15:35, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

War in Bakhmut, 2022 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Jnmths (talk) 21:50, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at 18 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:46, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

будь добрий, простеж, аби категорії, як ця, відсилались у основну Ukraine photographs taken on 2022-10-18. Albedo (talk) 18:49, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

В багатьох випадках це буде неправильно. Є взагалі не фотографії, є знімки руйнувань, зроблені через великий час після руйнування (але розкатегоризовані за датою руйнування, а не зйомки, бо значення має перша, а не друга); є фотографії з неясною датою зйомки (ясно лише, що вона відрізняється від дати публікації). Sneeuwschaap (talk) 02:59, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

• File:Monument to Petro Sahaidachny during Russian invasion of Ukraine (02).jpg

And also:

• File:Monument to Petro Sahaidachny during Russian invasion of Ukraine (03).jpg
• File:Monument to Petro Sahaidachny during Russian invasion of Ukraine (04).jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 10:00, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Sorry, are you kidding? The sculpture is not even visible on these images. Sneeuwschaap (talk) 12:40, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

add September 2023 in Donetsk Oblast into category. thank Albedo (talk) 18:15, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But the Category:September 2023 in Donetsk Oblast is non-existent and empty. If we have enough media to make creation of this category meaningful, we can, of course, create it and add it to the category about the Kostiantynivka strike. Sneeuwschaap (talk) 18:23, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

скажу так: зробивши таку категорію, ми більше зробим подану категорію видимою, адже буде прямий перехід від September 2023 in Donetsk Oblast до Attack on Kostiantynivka, 6 September 2023 . Що ж до решти вмісту, він або додається, або додасться. Головне, є вже потреба у категорії, адже вона містить підкатегорію. Albedo (talk) 20:56, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Щодо видимості - навряд чи такі категорії комусь цікаві і хтось їх дивиться. Але можна й створити. Створив. Sneeuwschaap (talk) 21:09, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Вітаю¡ чи не стрічалося тобі (або чи не вантажив файлів) щодо перепоховання жертв аґресії? Any hint? Albedo (talk) 15:34, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Вітаю! Жертви стрічались, ексгумації стрічались, поховань теж трохи було, перепоховань - не пригадую. Sneeuwschaap (talk) 15:56, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

дякую за роботу, все те бачив, цікаві лише (поки) перепоховання Albedo (talk) 08:31, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Kursant504 (talk) 08:40, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−