User talk:Jebulon

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Revision as of 09:09, 23 August 2013 by France64160 (talk | contribs) (Amélioration photo: Réponse)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Archivage!

Wow merci çà c'est de l'efficacité! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:20, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Archivage

Moi aussi j'ai archivé...--Jebulon (talk) 08:57, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Chalvet de Rochemonteix

Bizarre quand je consulte son article dans Wiki il apparaît "en long" dans le format de la première image que tu as chargé... Très beau travail de restauration...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:35, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Madame Arthur!

Maintenant que tu me l'a rappelé je vais la fredonner toute la matinée plus peu être... c'est mon côté autiste. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

C'est aussi pour ça qu'on t'aime. Et je l'ai fait un peu exprès !--Jebulon (talk) 09:10, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Le coucou

Cher Jébulon,

J'aimerais avoir ton opinion. Tout comme toi j'ai choisi de donner la licence CC0 à mes photos. Je me réjouis à l'idée qu'elles peuvent être utilisées par tous. L'aspect éventuellement commercial de l'utilisation ne me gêne pas plus que ça. Mais là je dois dire que je n'apprécie pas vraiment : un certain TPS Dave - David Mark a un compte sur Pixabay où il importe des photos qui sont pour une grande part des photos avec la licence CC0 prises dans Wikimedia. J'ai eu la surprise d'y retrouver des dizaines de mes photos. J'ai également repéré plusieurs des tiennes. Et donc j'ai comme le sentiment que ce Dave Mark tout en ne le disant pas expréssement, se fait passer pour l'auteur des photos. J'ai eu une petite conversation avec un responsable de Pixabay qui m'a assuré qu'il n'était dit nulle part que TPS Dave était l'auteur… mais qu'il y aurait une discussion interne sur cette question. Juridiquement il n'y a rien à dire, mais cette usurpation me laisse mal à l'aise. Qu'en penses-tu ? Cordialement. Dinkum (talk) 15:01, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Réponse à la réponse sur le coucou

Cher Jebulon,

Ta réponse m'a fait bien plaisir. J'y ai retrouvé ce qui fait que je trouve Wikimedia tellement extraordinaire et enthousiasmant. Un grand merci. Oui, ce genre de désagrément doit être mis sous la liste : "Risques du métier" et basta.

Il y a longtemps que je pensais te dire un mot, car je suis tes photos depuis que je suis inscrite à Wikimedia. Je vis à Paris également et parfois, en regardant l'heure de prise de vue, je m'aperçois que nous nous sommes pratiquement croisés. De même tu as été en Andalousie où j'ai aussi fait un voyage l'année dernière.

Je regarde tes photos avec beaucoup de plaisir, elles ont, en dehors de leurs qualités techniques, un "je ne sais quoi" en plus qui les rendent uniques.

Bon courage pour ton travail sur les images anciennes !

Très bonne soirée. Cordialement. Dinkum (talk) 16:22, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Aurier

Le portrait dans les Wiki est allongé. On peut le corriger en mettant "upright 1" dans la formule. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:54, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merci, j'ai même réussi à le faire en japonais !!!--Jebulon (talk) 15:44, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jean Levaillant

Je signale à ta sagacité le cas du Général fr:Jean Levaillant qui est un des rares généraux à avoir décrit des espèces d’oiseau. Hélas il n’a pas de photographie. Quelle injustice! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done--Jebulon (talk) 13:55, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

wonderful!

Hello! I just wanted to personally thank you for your contributions to Commons! Your photographs are beautiful. Thank you for uploading them for everyone to use and view freely. Boomur (talk) 01:10, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Some water ballons for you

Sea of water balloons.

Hi Jebulon,

I noticed this and it reminded me of a picture of mine, as you can see. And I also have a questions: What does Rue des Tripiers mean (if anything)? Does it mean Street of dealers of tripe? It was pretty close to Rue des Tanneurs, so it appears that the roads there relate to lines of business.... --Slaunger (talk) 20:22, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Amélioration photo

Bonsoir,

J'ai amélioré une photo suivant vos remarques (War monument of Lesponne, France) sur cette page http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Quality_images_candidates/candidate_list#August_18.2C_2013 En espérant quelle réponde à vos attentes en terme de qualité, --France64160 (talk) 20:15, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merci --France64160 (talk) 09:09, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapel château Beynac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent shot. Great composition and detail. --Frank Schulenburg 18:36, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Window chapel château Beynac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Hi Jebulon ! -- Good quality. --JLPC 17:28, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boulet mur Beynac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:23, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oursons gélatine marché Rouffignac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Oversaturated (with sugar). Welcome back. --Kadellar 15:43, 18 August 2013 (UTC) Thx. I was not very far (interested by old pics and VI page)... Nothing has really changed here, as I can see...--Jebulon 16:54, 18 August 2013 (UTC) -- Except that you became a sweet tooth during the vacancies! -- Alvesgaspar 20:29, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Incendie hôtel Lambert dédoubleur tuyaux pompiers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:37, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Incendie hôtel Lambert dévidoir tuyaux pompiers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --A.Savin 21:48, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Incendie hôtel Lambert Paris 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:17, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bobines fil Rouffignac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Greater DOF would be nice, but ok. Mattbuck 15:27, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Orange bell-peppers Rouffignac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very noisy at the shady areas of the peppers, isn't it? --A.Savin 21:45, 19 August 2013 (UTC)Really ? I don't see very noisy areas. Could you please annotate them in order to help me for correction ? Thanks in advance.--Jebulon 23:58, 19 August 2013 (UTC)OK, I've seen and understood now. Uploaded a new denoised version. Better ?--Jebulon 00:33, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Imo yes, enough for QI.  Support --A.Savin 09:15, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
[reply]