User talk:Ryulong

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}} For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

– Gurch 07:53, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

--ShadowHalo 05:49, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 04:14, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You tagged it as a copyvio - why? I'm suspicious of it myself, but I can't quite run it back to a source... Tabercil (talk) 02:13, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I don't know the "this is a fair use image so delete this now" tag.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 02:48, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Different blue/red, different curve, smaller dots, thinner line? All you have to do is ask. sonia 23:47, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will say this here so that I am sure you read it:

Personal attacks on other contributors will not be tolerated.

You are not in a position to know the motivations of others, and you should certainly not make sexual assumptions about them. Keep your comments on the facts, not on innuendo. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:26, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would email you but I do not know your email I think. this thread may be of interest to you. -- とある白い猫 ^ちぃ？ 17:39, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Ryulong. Recently you notified me that I made a copyright violation of file:Wikipedia 12.jpg and File:Special Newpages.jpg. Both of them are my works.

• I used 'PrtScnSysRq' button on the top right corner of a Microsoft keyboard.It captured the screenshot of Special:Newpages.Then I pasted the screenshot on to MS Paint, then saved it to .jpeg format.Then I uploaded the file.What's wrong in this???
• For File:Wikipedia 12.jpg, I created the image using Magic Photo Editor, a nice photo editing software.I placed many cartoons, and clip art.Thus, it's my OWN Work.How could you call this a copyright violation.I'm surprised in this.Reply soon.Dipankan001 (talk) 16:14, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The clip art was the issue. Because you did not create the clip art (presumably the creators of Magic Photo Editor do), you do not own anything about the image and that is why it was a copyright violation.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 10:58, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Special Newpages.jpg was deleted as being a derivative work of Windows GUI elements. Actually the Wikipedia logo is unfree too. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:24, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All I remember was bad clipart everywhere.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 11:25, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Legoland_Billund_-_Pirate_Carousel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

84.61.131.15 18:25, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, could you please convert the maps of seasons 1-18 of The Amazing Race (U.S.) from PNG to SVG (scale vector graphics) format?

Here's the files of TAR maps in 18 seasons (will include black dots in leg stops):

• File:Amazing race 1 map.PNG
• File:Amazing race 2 map.PNG
• File:Amazing race 3 map.PNG
• File:Amazing race 4 map.PNG
• File:Amazing race 5 map.PNG
• File:Amazing race 6 map.PNG
• File:Amazing race 7 map.PNG
• File:Amazing race 8 map.PNG
• File:Amazing race 9 map.PNG
• File:Amazing race 10 map.png
• File:Amazing race 11 map.png
• File:Amazing race 12 map.png
• File:The Amazing Race 13 Map.png
• File:The Amazing Race 14 Map.png
• File:The Amazing Race 15 Map.png
• File:The Amazing Race 16 Map.png
• File:Amazing race 17 map.png
• File:Amazing race 18 map.png

ApprenticeFan ^work 04:03, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't do it myself. Someone has said they'd do it.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 06:16, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi there!!! Could you get an update for TAR20 map includes the destination from Baku (AZ) to Kilimanjaro (TZ)? --ApprenticeFan ^work 01:43, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Contact me on en.wiki next time. My friend just gave me the new map.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 04:11, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Legoland Billund - Pirate Carousel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 18:19, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Computer Atomium.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

84.61.167.120 08:27, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. As I noticed in el.wp, you have removed from articles files that you believe that are copyright violating. As a matter of fact, you may be right for some of them, but not for all of them. Some are user's own works, some others, as "File:Thessaloniki Alexander the Great statue.png" come from flickr and have been verified about their license. Thank you. --Ttzavaras (talk) 14:16, 26 October 2013 (UTC) (sorry, I'd been disconnected without noticing it).[reply]

Anything that Nikostrd posted needs to be deleted. That's all I was working on.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 14:34, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

You are absolutely right about the files he has uploaded. What I am suggesting is not to remove pictures the specific user has added in articles but have not been uploaded by him. Thanks. --Ttzavaras (talk) 17:13, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I may have removed more than was necessary and I apologize. I was only going off of what had "File:" instead of the Greek language form.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 19:48, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

No problem. In any case thanks for your contribution in removing files violating copyright. Any minor "damage" has already been repaired! Thanks again. --Ttzavaras (talk) 10:16, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Ryulong: I thought you might like to see the magnitude of the problem of a particular Sock about whom you have previously commented. I am about to update the chart with several more found this morning. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:17, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Ellin Beltz: Why is it deleted already?—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 12:36, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Because another user made a big fuss about it and it seemed easier to remove it from Commons than to continue any problems. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:00, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Ellin Beltz: That other user just seems to want to keep the drama of banned users off of the Commons.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 14:24, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

When they themselves linked to my internal user page and demanded I remove it, I think they were making more drama than I had made by making the list in the first place. List is on my home computer as they suggested, it shows over 3 years of disruption to the project and an accelerating rate of uploads. Both of those factoids were of interest as were the dozens of names involved in all this. That other user apparently has jealousy issues with me, hence their comments about (paraphrase) "more uploads and longer time here". Also they've made public comments questioning my ability to be an admin after I asked Jim a question and we had a nice healthy debate about the fine points on his talk page. If I'm not allowed to ask questions, and now not allowed to put things on my own user space to work on, I kinda wonder who appointed anyone "boss" of the rest of us? It's beginning to look like harassment, bullying or something equally unpleasant. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:45, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I found two more on en:wiki[1] & [2] plust one more on Commons [3] uploader of File:25_tolowadunes.jpg and File:Davenportcalifornia.jpg. Plus the 59 en:wiki and/or commons accounts I found before this takes it up to 62. I suspect we're still missing a few and of course the activity is ongoing. If you would like a copy of the chart please let me know how to provide it to you. Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:01, 26 July 2014 (UTC) PS most useful reference [ http://rhizome.org/editorial/2011/feb/18/something-fishy-pelican-state-beach/ ]. Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:03, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may find this website of interest for finding more photos. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:56, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah that was one of the ones I was crossreferencing yesterday.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 20:41, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

		The Original Barnstar
		Thanks Ryulong for sticking with stuff, going the extra mile, showing grace under pressure, and being a rock against which mere waves have no effect. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:52, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fyi, some more uploads of Beach Buem series found this morning. The lower one was only uploaded recently:

1.) Enofromubu

File:Westonbeach.jpg

File:Sunsetpoint17miledrive.jpg

2.) Theskullsofsealionscoveringawall

File:Clam_Beach_County_Park.JPG

Sigh. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:05, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Ellin Beltz: Russavia undeleted the Whale Beach photo(s) again when I went on IRC to ask for help in reporting these accounts to COM:Requests for checkuser.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 00:09, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Double sigh... This image captures my dream for Wiki Commons and all our community of admins... Someday, maybe, but let's all work to make it so. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:45, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've had a look in the archive regarding the Horvitz incident and you seem to have been active in it. Does File:MooddisorderMooddisorder.jpg looks familiar? I haven't seen the original, but suddenly a couple of new accounts showed up on dawiki, pushing the picture and it reminded me of this case. Regards Knud Winckelmann (talk) 15:31, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. It's Horvitz again.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 01:21, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

@Knud Winckelmann & Ryūlóng I have no idea how you caught this, but please don't hesitate to bring actions of this sort to light, thank you so much for this good catch and fast action! Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:26, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

<Sigh...>File:Mooddisordermood.jpg. Knud Winckelmann (talk) 14:48, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll ping @Ellin Beltz: just in case, as I can see that it's been a while since you've been here. Regards Knud Winckelmann (talk) 14:53, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done See here and here. Thank you for sharp eyes and fast correspondence. Please feel free to write me anytime on my talk page, although I'm pretty sure Ryulong is still active!! Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:33, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah sorry I don't check the commons that often Knid Winckelmann. There has to be some way to see if he's done this again, like some tool that checks the commons for duplicate files or maybe someone to run a fucking check user at this point.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 15:01, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

File:205-3100 m2.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

 

Yours sincerely, 1989 16:53, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:205-3100 m2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

1989 18:51, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Ryulong's blind reverts (permanent link to current version). I would have used the notice of the AN/U filing to cover the above link, but you reverted it without comment.[4] Obviously, you have the right to do that. However, superior: Thank the user for the notice. I know that runs against your massive Wikipedia experience (which is truly awesome), but ... there is a much better way. w:WP:AGF was deprecated on en.wiki, because Wikipedia gave up in despair, most users never understood what AGF really meant. Not surprising. Most human beings don't understand. Good luck, and my condolences for your en.wiki ban. If I can be of any assistance, let me know. Sometimes I can pull a rabbit out of a hat and agreement out of a battle. Maybe the users only agree to get me to shut up. Hey, whatever it takes. --Abd (talk) 21:34, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nanshu's level of disruption is more important to deal with TBH.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 22:53, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Also my caps lock messages is meant to show confusion as to how Nanshu is capable of saying "This is fake" while also at the same time giving sources that show something exists.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 00:53, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

The caps lock is intended to show emotion. It worked.

RYULONG! YOU ARE NOT GETTING IT!

How was that? Does it improve communication?

If Nanshu continues what he was doing, he won't last long, I predict. But let's assume he won't.

This is what you are missing: you were warned for your behavior. You will not be harmed by his behavior, and neither will his misbehavior protect you from the consequences of your own.

You are a valuable user. I warn you so we won't lose you, as en.wiki lost you. You are more important to the projects than Nanshu, if we have to make a choice. I'd rather not. Your user name was familiar to me, and the associations were positive.

Your response to this situation is tarnishing that. Learn when to shut up, learn when to say, "Sorry, I won't do that again." It's a valuable skill.

Your responses lead me to think that you are likely to do it again. All it will take is something so "important" that you start revert warring instead of doing what you promised to do on en.wiki. Or did you promise? I looked more carefully at your enwiki user talk page. Very interesting. [5]. Unblocking you, CBW's reason was (User will report stuff rather than edit war) I assumed you had promised that. I was wrong. This is what you had actually written:

I promise I will try to be more diligent in reporting this stuff more widely next time.

It's obvious to me that CBW was looking for an excuse to unblock you. That comment did not even promise to "more widely" report. Hey, I promised to "try to be more diligent." I tried! I didn't promise to reduce edit warring! Where did I say that? I tried, but my internet connection was bad. I was using a phone. And besides, don't you get it? This was a Really Bad User! And nobody responded for hours to my request!

Ryulong, here you made no request at all. You just insulted the user and reverted. You did not seek a reasonable compromise, which was possible. You essentially set it up for the user to go to AN/U.

As was pointed out on your enwiki talk page, you are trivial to troll. If uou are poked, you have a predictable response. If that doesn't change, your wiki history will continue to go downhill.

You have no obligation respond to this. You may archive your talk page at any time. You may remove this, of course, but I very much do not recommend that. One of the things I can read in your enwiki history was you were facing a likely ban and you were still uncivil on your talk page, with no necessity at all. I'm not claiming that this caused the ban, I have not researched your ban. Those things take a lot of time, and it's not that relevant here. You know the history.

What I'm telling you is that you are repeating at least some of the behavior that got you banned on en.wiki. With your contribution history there, that took a lot. It is easier to be blocked here, in fact, though it's not reliable, it's quirky.

There are possible positive responses and a harmless one: you can say, "Wow, yes, thanks for reminding me," or something like that. I've done that when blocked for incivility. It doesn't matter if I was right or wrong, a response like that engages the community and builds support. The harmless response is to do nothing. Let it sit, let it go into a talk page archive. And then there are responses that show a continuing problem. Your choice. I'm not your judge, I'm not an admin, at least not now, and I'm not likely to take you to a noticeboard, I prefer to sit a user down for a little chat. With respect. Unless absolutely pushed into a corner, where others are being harmed.

Good luck. --Abd (talk) 02:08, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What happened at enwp is of no real importance here as that was all political tbh.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 23:47, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

• All wikis are political. That is, they are communities of people, the polis.
• "Wherever you go, there you are." (Buckaroo Banzai). --Abd (talk) 01:45, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ryulong, do you read Japanese well? --Abd (talk) 19:03, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I can read enough.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 23:46, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Perhaps you may be able to assist at File talk:Procession of Joseon mission.jpg. Thanks. --Abd (talk) 01:31, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:ChipCoffey.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 14:36, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:NortonFighterV2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Darklanlan (talk) 10:16, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]