User talk:SKas

Archive here

Это была красивая победа! JukoFF (talk) 21:45, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@JukoFF. Спасибо! Да, это был поистине марафон. И только случайно, на последних метрах (или километрах), мне удалось вырваться вперед! Вас с серебряной медалью! SKas

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Dormition of the Theotokos in Vysokoye.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Please provide EXIF data. --Basotxerri 13:22, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maclura tricuspidata fruit..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 18:05, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Мне не понятно ваше нежелание добавлять нужные категории в ваши фотографии. Делать это надо не только для номинации в качественные (там уж и вовсе сам бог велел), но и вообще. Только что я делал замечание по другой вашей номинации, вы исправили, а теперь та же история File:Лесная беседка в горах.jpg. Где было сделано фото? Picnic tables должна быть внутри Picnic places, а Picnic places in Russia требует чего-либо из древа "...in Russia". как иначе обеспечивать связность? Смотрим, что у нас над Picnic places - parks, visitor attractions. Соответственно, Parks in Russia / Visitor atractions in Russia - это минимум. --A.Savin 23:00, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Добрый день, Александр! Не совсем понял смысл Ваших претензий. Picnic tables у меня и есть внутри Picnic places. А вот куда вставить Picnic places еще, кроме как ... by country, я пока даже и не думал. Надеюсь найдётся какой-нибудь другой опытный редактор, который вставит её в другую ветку. Главное, что я категорию создал и она не висит в воздухе. Что касается места лесной беседки в горах, то я указал Краснодарский край. Привязывать его к населённому пункту? Там ближе 20 км ничего нет. Указывать координаты? Не вижу смысла. Так что нежелания добавлять нужные категории, я вроде бы за собой не наблюдаю. Наоборот, стараюсь откатегоризировать по максимуму. Правда, не всегда хватает времени и опыта. Ну так уж извиняйте, если, что не так. Учту замечание. Спасибо. --KSK (talk) 05:26, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Чёрный лебедь.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Might be worth reducing highlights a little, however. --Crisco 1492 06:51, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Domesticated turkey.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very poor categories. What kind of turkeys? Of which country? Where taken? Nothing there. --A.Savin 02:12, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]  Done enough? --SKas 07:11, 20 October 2016 (UTC) OK --A.Savin 12:51, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Telekia speciosa in Caucasus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK for me, although DOF could be better. --C messier 07:12, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Горки в Сочи парк.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1. I like the purple colour however I think it is manual done. Perspective and sharpness good enough. --Michielverbeek 06:19, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cordon of forest guard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok now, IMO --Hubertl 03:50, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Birthday of the Witch Baba Yaga or Halloween in Russian.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 15:03, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Bogatyr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 14:11, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SKas, i have seen some of your past edits and hope you can help. i created Category:Lena Delta resource reserve for ru:Лена-Дельта. Because i did not find a precise map for the area, i don't know if all or only a few (and which) of the New Siberian Islands (or maybe other islands too?) can be added as subcategories to "Lena Delta resource reserve". Maybe you can have a look? Holger1959 (talk) 12:34, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

now found the map at oopt.aari.ru and added subcategories to Category:Lena Delta resource reserve. please feel free to check, correct or add information. Holger1959 (talk) 14:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Holger1959. Your additions of subcategories in category Lena Delta resource are justified and correct IMO. --KSK (talk) 17:22, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Датолит-кальцит.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 19:16, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Агат.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 19:14, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Кварц.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 19:14, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Клинохлор.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 19:14, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Кристаллы кварца на датолите и гранатовая щётка.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 19:16, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ;o) Yann (talk) 09:45, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks a lot, Yann. I did not decide to nominate myself. For some reason was overmodest. --KSK (talk) 09:57, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Вход в Сочи парк накануне Хэллоуина.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Funny, and the quality is good enough, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 05:12, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Срез.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 23:30, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dendrit Russia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 23:30, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Цветущая мушмула.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:13, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:35, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 3S Cableway in Krasnaya Polyana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:08, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Heracleum sosnowskyi Inflorescence..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 20:01, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 3S Cableway in Krasnaya Polyana 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 14:18, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cableway in Esto Sadok +.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 10:34, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Уважаемый коллега, возник вопрос по файлу File:LetavetAA.jpg взятому из http://www.alpklubspb.ru/mem/120121_01.htm. По имеющейся на сайте питерского альклуба информации http://www.alpklubspb.ru/mem/120121_01.htm этот человек - не А. Летавет, а Леонид Гутман. Может быть его лучше переименовать и переоформить? Заранее спасибо за ответ. С уважением, MarchHare1977 (talk) 17:40, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Весьма вероятно, что это так. Думаю, что Alpclub SPb более авторитетен в этом вопросе, чем сайт Silk Road Adventure, откуда был взят снимок. --KSK (talk) 07:13, 10 November 2017 (UTC)дклать[reply]

Спасибо вам большое, коллега! Хочу вас опять попросить: не подскажете ли каких-либо фотографий для иллюстрирования статьи в википедии об Отдельных горнострелковых отрядах РККА? Не могу понять, почему у меня не получается дать здесь ссылку на эту статью напрямую. Заранее вам спасибо. --MarchHare1977 (talk) 00:17, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Навскидку, например, здесь:http://war-only.com/uniforma-gornostrelkovyx-otryadov-rkka.html. При этом надо следить за соблюдением авторских прав. Иногда помогает с поиском фото Google, Yandex. Если хотите сделать ссылку из Коммонз на статью в Википедии надо впереди добавлять :w:ru:. Например: Отдельный горнострелковый отряд. Удачи! --KSK (talk) 08:46, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Škoda Rapid Sport front three-quarter view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:50, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:26, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Volkswagen Cross Blue - front..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and unique in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 07:26, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose quarter view lacks, people --Mile (talk) 09:23, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support I don't like photographs of cars taken with very short lens. But here we have a rare image and visitors in an exhibition are usual. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 11:36, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 11 November 2017 (UTC).[reply]
•  Support Per others. --Palauenc05 (talk) 10:42, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

-- -- DeFacto (talk). 19:19, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:С Султаном Государства Бруней-Даруссалам Хассаналом Болкиахом.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:С Султаном Государства Бруней-Даруссалам Хассаналом Болкиахом.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Pitpisit (talk) 13:09, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Pitpisit. Source is OK. Be more attentive, please.--KSK (talk) 07:11, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Posolstvoub.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Posolstvoub.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Smooth O (talk) 12:02, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

На основании чего была переименована категория? Откуда такая транскрипция и почему ссылка на Викиданных не была исправлена? Теперь из статьи читатель попадает на «прекрасную» блямбду со стрёмной фразой о доступности вместо галереи: ru:Паляваам. Мастер теней (talk) 16:55, 11 January 2018 (UTC)вам[reply]

Уважаемый Мастер теней. Категория переименована в связи с Правилами: Commons:Language policy, Commons:Категории. Советую вам их изучить. Хотелось бы также рекомендовать вам не писать в таком хамски-развязном тоне. Wikipedia и Commons это не блог, где часто, к сожалению, преобладает подобный стиль общения.--KSK (talk) 17:35, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Комментарий "more correct" тоже довольно хамский. А так мне разрешили, если что) "excepting some of proper names" — вполне себе имя собственное. Мастер теней (talk) 14:46, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anemone caucasica flower..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. I see there's only one photo in the category, and I hope it's safe to assume that this is the only photo of this flower on Commons. Is this a rare flower? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:25, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:19th WFYS logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

2A02:2168:1237:FF00:F9FB:C583:D83C:DA5 05:43, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

• File:1894-1895. Baron de Baye. 19 phot. de Crimée (10) (26301337625).jpg

And also:

• File:1894-1895. Baron de Baye. 19 phot. de Crimée (12) (25698597173).jpg
• File:1894-1895. Baron de Baye. 19 phot. de Crimée (14) (25698597093).jpg
• File:1894-1895. Baron de Baye. 19 phot. de Crimée (16) (26275388336).jpg
• File:1894-1895. Baron de Baye. 19 phot. de Crimée (2) (25696473724).jpg
• File:1894-1895. Baron de Baye. 19 phot. de Crimée (20) (26275388066).jpg
• File:1894-1895. Baron de Baye. 19 phot. de Crimée (22) (25696472554).jpg
• File:1894-1895. Baron de Baye. 19 phot. de Crimée (24) (26275387866).jpg
• File:1894-1895. Baron de Baye. 19 phot. de Crimée (38) (26235077361).jpg
• File:1894-1895. Baron de Baye. 19 phot. de Crimée (4) (26275388816).jpg
• File:1894-1895. Baron de Baye. 19 phot. de Crimée (40) (25696471504).jpg
• File:1894-1895. Baron de Baye. 19 phot. de Crimée (42) (25698595143).jpg
• File:1894-1895. Baron de Baye. 19 phot. de Crimée (44) (26208919202).jpg
• File:1894-1895. Baron de Baye. 19 phot. de Crimée (46) (25698595023).jpg
• File:1894-1895. Baron de Baye. 19 phot. de Crimée (48) (25696471184).jpg
• File:1894-1895. Baron de Baye. 19 phot. de Crimée (6) (25698597493).jpg
• File:1894-1895. Baron de Baye. 19 phot. de Crimée (8) (26275388686).jpg

Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 09:17, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Strix uralensis (juvenile) (Ural Owl).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Great shot, but this doesn't show the chest feathers as well as the image on the Wikipedia article. Charles (talk) 16:49, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment Look at the changes to the format of the scope. It's a juvenile; if you add this informtion in the scope it is a good image for VI --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  Scope changed. --KSK (talk) 16:50, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:51, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Морозный закат.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:55, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Предрассветное.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:55, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Вид с мыса Шунтэ.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:55, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Рассвет над Хужиром.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:35, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rock climbing in Sochi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:44, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sochi Sky Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:24, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ваши массовые правки продолжают удивлять своей непрофессиональностью, хотя вы воде бы уже давно здесь. Когда категории создаёте -- почти всегда не хватает логически связанных материнских категорий. Мемориальная доска, названная в честь Немцова -- это вообще уж предел глупости. Попахивает откровенным вредительством. Мне вас на время заблокировать, чтобы вы наконец прислушались к более опытным коллегам и перестали создавать им лишнюю работу, делая всё подряд через одно определённое место? --A.Savin 20:51, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Категории надо оформлять как-то так. Если вы не можете сами додуматься -- к вашим услугам Category:Audrey Hepburn by year, смотрите, как там оформлены аналогичные категории, делайте по тому же шаблону. Не благодарите. Последний раз прошу вас прислушаться. В следующий раз будет блокировка. --A.Savin 13:50, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• @A.Savin. Прекратите меня преследовать[[1]], [[2]], [[3]] и оскорблять („через одно место“, „предел глупости“, „не можете додуматься“ и т.д.). Вместо того, чтобы придираться ко мне по мелочам, займитесь чем-нибудь полезным для проекта.--SKas

а) Я никого не преследую и не оскорбляю. б) Категоризация отнюдь не является мелочами, особенно если делается вроде опытным участником, массово и в течение длительного времени. в) Я и занимаюсь полезным для проекта -- спросите любого вменяемого коллегу, он вам охотно подтвердит. --A.Savin 12:15, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Здравствуйте. Так как вы предпочитаете игнорировать многочисленные просьбы и делаете большую часть ваших категоризационных правок заведомо неверно, заставляя меня и других участников всё переделывать, а то и откатывать вас (Category:Rock climbing in Italy без связности с категориями Италии; нарушение COM:OVERCAT вот здесь, и т.д.), я вас заблокировал на 3 дня. --A.Savin 01:08, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Стадо серн на cклонах горы Аибга.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:12, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View to Caucasian Biosphere Reserve from Aibga ridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:12, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ледяные парусники.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ледяные парусники.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Родовые столбы сэргэ.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Родовые столбы сэргэ.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Нерпичий взгляд.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Нерпичий взгляд.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:06, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Добрый день! Подскажите, на этом вашем фото First snow in Krasnaya Polyana.JPG случайно не гора ru:Каменный Столб?--RosssW (talk) 07:27, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Да, она самая.--KSK (talk) 07:41, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо! Уже поставил в статью.--RosssW (talk) 07:52, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 3 days for the following reason: see above. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock|(enter your reason here) ~~~~}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. See also the block log. For more information, see Appealing a block. العربية ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ Gaeilge ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ Simple English ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ suomi ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ বাংলা ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Что тут за вздор? Блокировка учётной записи закончилась 15 июня 2018 г. The block of the account expired June 15, 2018. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 09:42, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Отмена неправильной на мой взгляд блокировки может быть произведена в любое время, а не только в период действия блокировки.--KSK (talk) 10:08, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Не надо сюда тащить руВикипедию с её обычаями. The user requests expunging A.Savin’s block from the server logs – it’s a long-standing (and IMHO harmful) custom in ru.Wikipedia. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 10:15, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The request is made according to the rules of Commons. RuWikipedia has no relation here.--KSK (talk) 10:25, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Skas, you know very well that no block may be lifted after it has expired, so your "unblock" request is pretty useless and no sysop in the world will ever process it. You also know very well, that the block as of July'18 was because of real issues with wrong categorizaion, COM:OVERCAT and similar things despite the fact that you previously have been requested several times not to do so. For example, here OVERCATegorization, here I added the missing categories for you. It was definitely NOT for reasons you are trying to allege me. So stop the bullshit please and do proper categorization, or let it be completely. The best way to avoid block is not to violate project rules. For my part, I sincerely wish I didn't need monitoring your very numerous category edits anymore. Thanks. --A.Savin 12:10, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Мыс Столбчатый. После заката.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Мыс Столбчатый. После заката.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kamanin and Schmidt in 1934.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Materialscientist (talk) 07:29, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Вы опять нарушаете правила категоризации. Вы уже достаточно давно здесь, чтобы простейший иерархический принцип, держащийся на логической связности категорий по темам, уже наконец понять. Вот здесь я вас исправил. Чем тратить ваше время на обвинении меня в коррупции и всех бедах человечества, прочитайте уже внимательно COM:Categories. В противном случае, ваша повторная блокировка не за горами. --A.Savin 10:10, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Никак нет, господин Савин. Это вы, а не я нарушаете правила категоризации. Своей непродуманной правкой (Вот здесь я вас исправил) вы создали OVERcat, за что, судя по вашим представлениям о прекрасном, вас же и следует заблокировать на три дня. Разъясняю, поскольку вам видимо некогда разбираться с этим: Все природные парки Якутии из категории Nature parks in the Sakha Republic через категорию Protected areas of ХХХ District уже попали в категорию Protected areas of the Sakha Republic. Впрочем для меня нет ничего удивительного. В своём стремлении хоть как-то "ущучить" меня, вы уже неднократно нарушаете правила категоризации, за что мне приходится отменять ваши правки (см., например, здесь --KSK (talk) 10:51, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Protected areas of the Sakha Republic от аСавина — никакой не Overcat, т.к. указанная категория не является ни над- ни подкатегорией от имевшейся Nature parks in Russia by region. Не могу взять в толк, с чего SKas заедается на пустом месте. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 12:36, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Даже не знаю, что тут и думать. Можете вы доказать на конкретных правилах и руководствах, что я добавляю лишние категории? Пока налицо лишь тот факт, что ВАША правка неверна, а не моя. Вы создали категорию, относящуюся к Якутии (в данном случае -- по природным паркам) и не добавили её ни в одну из категорий, связанных с собственно Якутией. Таким образом, если кто-либо заходит в Category:Sakha и пытается оттуда найти вашу категорию, используя иерархическую структуру (география -> природа -> природоохранные зоны -> природные парки), у него это не выйдет. И для вас является нарушением, если я этот недодел исправляю? Вы серьёзно? Я не знаю, с какого проекта вы пришли на Викисклад, но вам определённо следует вспомнить старую русскую пословицу "В чужой монастырь со своим уставом не ходят". И нет, никого "ущучить" я не желаю. Я с уважением отношусь к вашей работе по спискам ОПТ России и не хочу, чтобы вы слились. Но относитесь и вы с уважением к работе ваших коллег. --A.Savin 18:23, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Einsatzgruppen or their auxiliaries - Kovno 1942.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Buidhe (talk) 23:30, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:УкреплениеСвятогоДуха.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

VLu (talk) 14:15, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Saudações. Você está recebendo esta mensagem porque, em outro ano, participou da competição fotográfica Wiki Loves Monuments. Escrevo em nome do grupo organizador do Wiki Loves Monuments deste ano para convidá-lo/convidá-la a participar de novo!

O Wiki Loves Monuments é o maior concurso fotográfico do mundo. Permite ampliar o conhecimento global sobre o Brasil, mostrando a riqueza cultural e histórica do país. Neste ano, ampliamos enormemente as listas de monumentos a serem registrados e isso ajuda na difusão da diversidade brasileira.

Participe do Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 - Brasil e ganhe prêmios! Serão premiadas as melhores fotografias e também aqueles e aquelas que mais contribuirem com registros fotográficos diversos do patrimônio cultural e histórico brasileiro. Leia as instruções com cuidado!

De novo, obrigado por participar do Wiki Loves Monuments e melhorar o conhecimento livre disponível na internet! Se tiver dúvidas, não hesite em entrar em contato!—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲»22:00, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Urbanistička cjelina Makarske.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:39, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:AANovikov.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 19:22, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 

العربية | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | English | español | فارسی | français | עברית | हिन्दी | italiano | magyar | македонски | 日本語 | Nederlands | português do Brasil | română | سنڌي | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | українська | +/−

---

Dear SKas,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:09, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2019 has started in the whole world. It is now completed in Russia (active in May), Ukraine and France (active during November), but it's still open in all the other countries.

If you want to take part where WSC2019 is still open, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, please consider that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

Please keep in mind that there is a new category this year, i.e. "nature and wildlife".

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase, please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2020.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsuscribe from this list

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2019 #WikiScience #WikiScience2019

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--01:11, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 

العربية | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | English | español | فارسی | français | עברית | हिन्दी | italiano | magyar | македонски | 日本語 | Nederlands | português do Brasil | română | سنڌي | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | українська | +/−

---

Dear SKas,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:20, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:German soldiers in Prague 1939.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Buidhe (talk) 20:37, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Expedition North Pole 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 20:28, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Спирин Иван Тимофеевич.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 20:29, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

• File:Ernst Krenkel 1938.jpg

And also:

• File:Fedorov at the North Pole.jpg
• File:Fedorov in 1937.jpg
• File:North Pole station.jpg
• File:North Pole-1 station.jpg
• File:NorthPole1.jpg
• File:Petr Shirshov.JPG
• File:Soviet airplane at the North Pole in 1937.jpg
• File:Soviet airplanes at the North Pole in 1937.jpg
• File:Папанинцы 2.jpg
• File:Папанинцы на Северном полюсе.jpg
• File:Папанинцы.jpg

Yours sincerely, PlanespotterA320 (talk) 20:37, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop categorization in traditionnal climbing such as this edit. That is not correct. Read the wikipedia articles about trad climbing and w:Sport climbing, to understand the difference.

If there are permanent anchor point (bolt) on the rock, the discipline is called "sport climbing". Traditional climbers carry a lot of equipment on their harness ; if the climbers carry only quickdraws, it's sport climbing. --Irønie (talk) 21:28, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Hello Irønie. Sports climbing is an Olympic sport, competitions are held according to special rules and as a rule on artificial walls. Redpoint (climbing), in my opinion it is more a form of traditional rock climbing on a natural rock relief. If anything, it 's a matter of discussion. It is not by chance that the article Sports climbing requires verification. But if you think I 'm wrong, you can fix it. I do not object. --KSK (talk) 13:08, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:NNVoronov1940.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 19:48, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:1941kuznetsov.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:38, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Мыс Столбчатый. После заката.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 10:09, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Leypunskiy-with-wife.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 17:10, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:NNVoronov1932.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 02:43, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Islamische-Entwicklungsbank.gif. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Islamische-Entwicklungsbank.gif]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Yours sincerely, Jonteemil (talk) 11:50, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stalin's Dacha (9) (14645235282).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 04:47, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Groz-120.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Dogad75 (talk) 22:22, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Demonstration1905Novorossysk.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Stolbovsky (talk) 23:12, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mikhail Blinov.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−