User talk:Marrovi
- Archivo 2008
- Archivo 2009
- Archivo 2010
- Archivo 2011
- Archivo 2012
- Archivo 2013
- Archivo 2014
- Archivo 2015
- Archivo 2016
Disambiguation of categories
I think about Category:Ex monastery of San Francisco, Pachuca => Category:Ex monastery of San Francisco, Pachuca de Soto, Hidalgo, Mexico move...
We have a rule on Wiki Projects, that we do not add a disambiguation to the names if it is not absolutely necessary. For example: when there is only one Category:Lucrécia on Commons it doesn't need a disambiguation (in brackets or after comma). Only when we have two different Category:Lucrécia, we are adding a disambiguation mark, for example:
The same situation is with the categories you've moved yesterday.
- Hi, in Mexico is necessary to make changes, because we have many old tamples with the same name, other user edited a specific point situation as: temple, (town o city), (state), (country). I use this logical order for new categories about Mexican churches. Thank you very much for the rules in other wikiprojects, see you next time.--Marrovi (talk) 16:36, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
- 1) @Marrovi: until we don't have photos from another place with the same name, WE SHOULDN'T MAKE DISAMBIGUATIONS in advance!!! We do it only at situations, when we have got files from two objects with the same name! Look here Category:Ex monastery of Saint Augustinus, Acolman de Nezahualcóyotl, Acolman, México, Mexico. In Category:Augustinian monasteries in Mexico we don't have any monasteries with the same name... so THERE'S NO NEED TO MAKE DISAMBIGUATIONS. It's better to add a description inside the category, f.e. English: Ex monastery of Saint Augustinus, Acolman de Nezahualcóyotl, Acolman, México state, Mexico countryot something like that...
- 2) Such long names of categories are not useful... we don't need to have all informations about the object in the name of the category. If there aren't two monasteries with the same name in Acolman, the name Category:Ex monastery of Saint Augustinus, Acolman de Nezahualcóyotl is quite enough. A name Category:Ex monastery of Saint Augustinus, Acolman de Nezahualcóyotl, Acolman, México, Mexico, North America, the Earth, Milky Way, Solar System is not necessary ;P Wieralee (talk) 11:13, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Thesupermat (talk) 09:14, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Arreglar redirecciones
Hola Marrovi, ¿podrías arreglar por favor las redirecciones que creaste con los siguientes múltiples traslados? Desde el artículo de Wikipedia Palacio Municipal de Puebla, en enlaces externos se enlaza hacia Commons con Category:Palacio Municipal de Puebla, y desde ahí hay una serie enorme de redirecciones producto de traslados que tú hiciste, solo ve entrando a cada una de las páginas a que redirige y te darás cuenta. Cada una de esas redirecciones debe apuntar la categoría final, la definitiva, sin redirecciones intermedias, y también el artículo en Wikipedia. Te dejo hacerlo en Commons antes de hacer yo el cambio en Wikipedia (sé que estás bloqueado allá), haré la edición después para asegurarme de que busques antes por favor arreglar las redirecciones. Saludos. --UAwiki (talk) 18:08, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
- El reclamo no es por la traducción a inglés, sino porque quedó como residuo una serie de redirecciones mal hechas, debes cambiarlas para que terminen apuntando a la categoría final, el nombre que tenga. --UAwiki (talk) 18:40, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
- Bueno, ya arreglé tu desastre, visto que no me expliqué bien o no quisiste comprenderme y ha pasado un par de días. Porque una cosa es usar el nombre en inglés de una categoría, y otra es trasladar "Palacio Municipal de Puebla" a "Municipal palace of Puebla", 4 minutos después trasladar a "City hall palace of Puebla City", 1 minuto después a "City Hall Palace of Puebla City", 20 minutos después a "Hall Palace of Puebla City", y 6 horas después a "Municipal Hall of Puebla City". Tantos traslados dejaron una serie de redirecciones, he apuntado todas a la categoría que quedó al final. --UAwiki (talk) 23:02, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
- Está bien, no hay problema, saludos y que te vaya bien :) --UAwiki (talk) 17:02, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
- Bueno, ya arreglé tu desastre, visto que no me expliqué bien o no quisiste comprenderme y ha pasado un par de días. Porque una cosa es usar el nombre en inglés de una categoría, y otra es trasladar "Palacio Municipal de Puebla" a "Municipal palace of Puebla", 4 minutos después trasladar a "City hall palace of Puebla City", 1 minuto después a "City Hall Palace of Puebla City", 20 minutos después a "Hall Palace of Puebla City", y 6 horas después a "Municipal Hall of Puebla City". Tantos traslados dejaron una serie de redirecciones, he apuntado todas a la categoría que quedó al final. --UAwiki (talk) 23:02, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chan Chan 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chan Chan (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
File:Enseñanza del ladino (1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
174.17.228.105 19:43, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
File:Enseñanza del ladino (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
174.17.228.105 19:43, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
File:Enseñanza del ladino (3).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
174.17.228.105 19:44, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Tulancingo (80).jpg
This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Tulancingo (80).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Ronhjones (Talk) 20:13, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Re: Mineral del Monte
There is a difference if the Historic centre of Mineral del Monte really exists or is something that the media and the tourist sites say. I couldn't found noting that say that really exist like a law or a decree, that define the poligonal area of the historic center.
I really doubt that there is an actual area designated Historic centre, I mean a protected area. Is maybe somthing that the people say. The only thing that I foun is waht the media and the tourist sites say. Maybe is the center area but is not cataloged Historic centre.
Anther thing is tha now whit these categories like "culture of", one more time is need the diference between city and municipality, becase all of the photos in that new category are from the city, and you are removing photos from the city that belong to the city category, is better to create "culture of the municipality of" and the photos can be in both categories. Or just those categories put them in the city category and if other towns of the municipality, if they had phothos of festivales or cucuisine, put them in the state category.RubeHM (talk) 16:02, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
File:Paris (91).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Poudou99 (talk) 14:36, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!
You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.
Dear Marrovi,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.
In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.
Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
File:Kalmanaltlajtolme Xilitlan, Narraciones de Xilitla, 2016.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
71.223.28.239 03:01, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
File:Kalmanaltlajtolme Xilitlan, Narraciones de Xilitla, 2016 (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
71.223.28.239 03:01, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
File:Diccionario español-náhuatl, Paul P. de Wolf, UNAM, 2003.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
71.223.28.239 03:02, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
File:Diccionario Náhuatl, John Sullivan, Universidad de Varsovia, 2016.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
71.223.28.239 03:03, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
File:Lengua náhuatl para los niños de hoy, Braulio Hernández, Toluca 2010. (1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
71.223.28.239 03:04, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Huasca (13).jpg
This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Huasca (13).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Ronhjones (Talk) 20:33, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
No mark, It's an architectonic motive.--Marrovi (talk) 02:05, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Re:
¡Hola! Está bien la categoría bajo el argumento que me dices, el tema es que la convocatoria (y las categorías por tanto) se basó en las definiciones hechas por la UNESCO y de este modo salió la convocatoria. Respeto y agradezco tu entusiasmo y ganas de cooperar, pero de este modo la convocatoria no tiene concordancia en Commons y con la convocatoria original misma. Podemos platicar el tema para el siguiente año, pero en esta ocasión no es posible que sea de esta manera. Abrazo, --ProtoplasmaKid (talk) 20:35, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
File tagging File:El exilio español en la CD de México (17).JPG
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:El exilio español en la CD de México (17).JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:El exilio español en la CD de México (17).JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Smooth O (talk) 12:50, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
File:El exilio español en la CD de México (17).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JuTa 10:57, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! El Arenal (40).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, bjh21 (talk) 18:46, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
error en descripcion
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_Mexico La foto titulada Mexican Jews of Polish ancestry, no es correcta. Ninguna de la 4 personas nacieron en México. Lo sé pues son familiares míos (yo si soy un judío mexicano de ascendencia polaca). Sentado a la derecha es Rabbi Jacob Avigdor, rabino principal de Mexico, con su esposa nacida en Europa, parado, su hijo Rabi Isaac Avigdor, nacido en Europa, y el niño es nieto de Rabi Jacob, nacido en USA. Quizá quisiera Ud hacer la correccíon a "inmigrantes polacos". También sugiero agregue esa foto en la biografía de Jacob Avigdor; inclsive alli se menciona al hijo Isaac que está en la foto. (ver Jacob Avigdor en Wikipedia English). El año es correcto, 1961. Saludos
Wiki Loves Folklore Postcard
Greetings! Thank you for your contribution in Wiki Loves Folklore 2020 Commons photography contest. The world is richer with your contributions today. Due to COVID-19 Pandemic, we are sharing a digital postcard as a token of appreciation. Please fill this form before 10 July 2020 to recieve your digital postcard from us.
Looking forward to welcome you next year in February 2021.
Wikilove and Gratitude
Wiki Loves Folklore International Team
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:55, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
Mapa de delegaciones del municipio de Ensenada
Hola Marrovi! Quisiera saber si me puedes ayudar a rediseñar tu mapa de las delegaciones del municipio de Ensenada, ya que el actual no está hecho correctamente. Te puedo pasar el archivo .kml con los límites delegacionales que me proporciono el Instituto Metropolitano de Investigación y Planeación de Ensenada. Gracias! --Leo Lc (talk) 19:35, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
OK, Va.--Marrovi (talk) 19:37, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Folklore 2021 is on!
You are humbly invited to participate in the Wiki Loves Folklore 2021 an international photography contest organized on Wikimedia Commons to document folklore and intangible cultural heritage from different regions, including, folk creative activities and many more. It is held every year from the 1st till the 28th of February.
You can help in enriching the folklore documentation on Commons from your region by taking photos, audios, videos, and submitting them in this commons contest.
Kind regards,
Wiki loves Folklore International Team
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:04, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Category:National_costumes_of_the_United_States has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Themightyquill (talk) 07:04, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
File:Flag of Oaxaca (unofficial).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
GPinkerton (talk) 18:07, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Bandera de Baja California Sur.PNG
- File:Bandera de Chiapas.png
- File:Bandera de Chihuahua.png
- File:Bandera de Durango.png
- File:Bandera de Guanajuato.png
- File:Bandera de Jalisco.png
- File:Bandera de Michoacán.png
- File:Bandera de Morelos.png
- File:Bandera de Nayarit.png
- File:Bandera de Oaxaca.png
- File:Bandera de Puebla.png
- File:Bandera de Querétaro.png
- File:Bandera de Quintana Roo.png
- File:Bandera de Sinaloa.png
- File:Bandera de Tamaulipas.png
- File:Bandera de Tequixquiac.jpg
- File:Bandera de Tlalnepantla de Baz.png
- File:Bandera de Veracruz.png
- File:Bandera de Zacatecas.png
- File:Bandera del Estado de México.png
Yours sincerely, GPinkerton (talk) 18:21, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, GPinkerton (talk) 19:03, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, GPinkerton (talk) 19:14, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, GPinkerton (talk) 19:16, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, GPinkerton (talk) 19:16, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, GPinkerton (talk) 19:17, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, GPinkerton (talk) 19:18, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, GPinkerton (talk) 19:20, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, GPinkerton (talk) 19:45, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Bandera de Hidalgo (Virgen de Guadalupe).png
- File:Bandera de Hidalgo.png
- File:Bandera del Estado de Hidalgo.png
Yours sincerely, GPinkerton (talk) 19:46, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, GPinkerton (talk) 19:50, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, GPinkerton (talk) 20:01, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, GPinkerton (talk) 20:05, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, GPinkerton (talk) 20:08, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Bandera de Sonora (Propuesta 1, 2010).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
GPinkerton (talk) 18:35, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Bandera propuesta de Jalisco.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
GPinkerton (talk) 06:44, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Folklore 2022 is on!
You are humbly invited to participate in the Wiki Loves Folklore 2022 an international photography contest organized on Wikimedia Commons to document folklore and intangible cultural heritage from different regions, including, folk creative activities and many more. It is held every year from the 1st till the 28th of February.
You can help in enriching the folklore documentation on Commons from your region by taking photos, audios, videos, and submitting them in this commons contest.
Kind regards,
Wiki loves Folklore International Team
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:15, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Flagvisioner (talk) 03:45, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
File:Bandera del orgullo criollo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
GPinkerton (talk) 14:49, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Folklore 2023 has started, Join us!
Hello Marrovi,
Greetings from Wiki Loves Folklore International Team!
Wiki Loves Folklore is an international photography contest hosted on Wikimedia Commons to document folklore and intangible cultural heritage from around the world, such as folk festivals, folk dances, folk music, folk activities, folk games, folk cuisine, folk wear, folktales, folk games, folk religion, mythology, and many more.
The campaign invites participants to document photographs, videos, and audios linked to folk culture and fit within the contest's theme. Through this campaign, you may become a part of a community dedicated to preserving our intangible culture, which has been brought and passed down for thousands of years.
How to Contribute?
The dates for the submission in the photography contest on Wikimedia Commons are from 1 February to 31 March 2023. Probably you are wondering how you can take part. It’s simple: grab a camera, record an image, video or audio under the folklore theme and start uploading ! To learn more about the rules, check out our Project page on Wikimedia Common. Here are the exciting prizes which you can win internationally.
International Prizes
- 1st prize: 500 USD
- 2nd prize: 400 USD
- 3rd prize: 300 USD
- Top 10 consolation prizes: 40 USD Each
- Best Video prize and best Audio prize: 150 USD & 150 USD
- Top uploader prize for images: First Prize: 100 USD, Second prize: 50 USD
- Wiki Loves Folklore Postcards to top 100 Uploaders
- Certificates and postcards to Local Organizers.
(Disclaimer : The above prizes will only be disbursed in form of gift card or voucher format only)
You can win both International prizes and your local Prizes simultaneously !
If you are interested in participating in the photography campaign, start photographing and collecting media of your local culture and get ready for the photo campaign happening on Wikimedia Commons. For more information about rules and prizes of the contest, refer here. For any questions, email us or join our telegram group
Warm regards,
Rockpeterson
Wiki Loves Folklore International Team.
Category:Chilena has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
186.174.243.114 13:52, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Folklore 2024 has started, Join us!
Hello Marrovi,
Greetings from the Wiki Loves Folklore International Team! Wiki Loves Folklore is an international photography contest hosted on Wikimedia Commons to document folklore and intangible cultural heritage from around the world, such as folk festivals, folk dances, folk music, folk activities, folk games, folk cuisine, folk wear, folktales, folk games, folk religion, mythology, and many more.
The campaign invites participants to document photographs, videos, and audios linked to folk culture and fit within the contest's theme. Through this campaign, you may become a part of a community dedicated to preserving our intangible culture, which has been brought and passed down for thousands of years.
How can I Contribute?
The dates for the submission in the photography contest on Wikimedia Commons are from 1 February 2024 through 31 March 2024. Probably you are wondering how you can take part. It’s simple: grab a camera, record an image, video or audio under the folklore theme and start uploading or Click on Upload Now Icon which is available on right side of Wiki Loves Folklore 2024. To learn more about the rules, check out our Project page on Wikimedia Commons.
Here are the exciting prizes which you can win internationally.
International Prizes
- 1st prize: 400 USD
- 2nd prize: 300 USD
- 3rd prize: 100 USD
- Top 10 consolation prizes: 40 USD (each)
- Best Video prize and best Audio prize: 50 USD (each)
- Top uploader prize for images: First Prize: 300 USD, Second prize: 150 USD
- Wiki Loves Folklore Postcards to top 100 Uploaders
- Certificates and postcards to Local Organizers.
(Disclaimer : The above prizes will only be disbursed in the form of gift card or voucher format only) You can win both International prizes and your local Prizes simultaneously !
If you are interested in participating in the photography campaign, start photographing and collecting media of your local culture and get ready for the photo campaign happening on Wikimedia Commons. For more information about rules and prizes of the contest, refer here. For any questions, email us or join our telegram group here
Warm regards,
Gaurav and Issac
#WeTogether
Wiki Loves Folklore International Team.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:02, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Commons. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block. See the block log for the reason that you have been blocked and the name of the administrator who blocked you.
|
--Bedivere (talk) 23:15, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
File:Ixtapa (13).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:50, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
File:La Défense Esplanade Le Bassin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
File:La Défense Grande Arche 20070316 Nuage.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |