User talk:Elkawe

Diskussionen für die Jahre 2007 - 2010 befinden sich im User:Elkawe/Diskussion-Achiv Elkawe (talk) 20:26, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Elkawi, ist das LKW-Bild auf diesem Schild ursprünglich auch von dir aufgenommen worden? Falls nicht, wo und für wie lange war das Schild angebracht? --Túrelio (talk) 19:38, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gut beobachtet Túrelio. Ja das habe ich am 16.11.2010 aufgenommen. Die Reklame wird etwa in den letzten 5 Jahren mehr oder weniger von der Firma Ulrich als Reklame benutzt. Je nach dem wie viel der Auflieger gewaschen wird, muss die Reklame erneuert werden. Gruß v. Elkawe (talk) 19:53, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Elkawi, was soll diese Lizenzänderung bedeuten? Das geht nicht. Du kannst nicht Jahre nach dem Upload die Lienz von PD auf CC-BY-SA ändern. --Túrelio (talk) 19:35, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

hallo Túrelio. Das habe ich deswegen gemacht, weil wenn man das Bearbeitungsfenster öffnet, sind unten die Hinweise mit „Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike“-Lizenz 3.0 usw. Das habe ich nun bestimmt gut gemeint und ich bin deswegen dabei gewesen, weil ich die kat und das Urheber usw,"Selbst" gegen "Elkawe" ausgetauscht habe. Ich danke dir fürs Aufpassen und ich werde es sein lassen. Natürlich dann nur noch bei neuen Bildern. Gruß vom Elkawe (talk) 19:46, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nein, ich habe nicht aufgepasst, sondern das war jemand anders aufgefallen und er hatte sogar auf :de gefragt, ob das denn gehe. Am besten wäre, wenn du das selbst rückgängig machst. Wenn dir viel daran liegt, kannst du gerne mal auf Commons talk:Licensing nachfragen, ob die Umwandlung von PD-self in die neue CC-0 oder wie die heißt akzeptabel wäre. --Túrelio (talk) 20:05, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Du kannst natürlich auch einfach beide Lizenzen angeben, das ist möglich. Chaddy (talk) 21:13, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für die Hinweise. Welche beiden meinst du denn Chaddy, die ich nun einfügen sollte? Diese Commons:Lizenzvorlagen Angelegenheiten sind ja total wirre. Gruß vom Elkawe (talk) 22:22, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Naja, du hast inzwischen zwei Lizenzen für das Bild erteilt: PD-self (streng genommen ist das allerdings gar keine "Lizenz") und CC. Du kannst natürlich beide stehen lassen, dann kann sich der Nachnutzer heraussuchen, unter welcher Lizenz er das Bild nutzen will (in diesem speziellen Fall ist das aber eher wenig sinnvoll, da wohl kaum jemand das Bild unter der CC-Lizenz nutzen will, wenn es dank PD-self auch viel einfacher geht).

Ich hab übrigens bereits die alte Lizenz nachgetragen. Chaddy (talk) 22:57, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vielen dank Chaddy, das ist sehr schwierig um da richtig durchzublicken. Nun werde ich die bisherigen Änderungen alle nach deinen Beispiel berichtigen. Gruß vom Elkawe (talk) 23:26, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:EuGH_(hinter_Eingang).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

84.62.204.7 13:39, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:EuGH_Verwaltungs-_+_Saalgebäude.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

84.62.204.7 21:32, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Altiero Spinelli Briefmarke.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ww2censor (talk) 22:30, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Abschrift Nr.1 einer EWG-Lizenz von 1994 als sog. EU-Lizenz (1999).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Abschrift Nr.1 einer EWG-Lizenz von 1994 als sog. EU-Lizenz (1999).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Basvb (talk) 11:36, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Basvb, danke das du in Commons aufpasst. Bei der EU-Lizenz handelt es sich um Eigentum des deutschen Staates. Die Lizenz wird nur vorübergehend verliehen. Die Lizenz ist übrigens auch schon abgelaufen und hat in keiner Weise eine Rechtsgültigkeit oder dergleichen. Solltest du trotzdem anderer Meinung sein, so lass es mich bitte wissen. Also es gibt keinen Rechtsinhaber, da die Lizenz erloschen ist. Die Lizenz hat natürlich einen historischen hohen Wert, da es den Anfang des Harmonisierten Transportmarktes in der EU sehr gut darstellt. Eine noch gültige EU-Lizenz wäre natürlich ein Löschgrund. MfG vom Elkawe (talk) 10:38, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:19a Transport- Genehmigung.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:19a Transport- Genehmigung.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:36, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ellin Beltz, die 19a Genehmigung hatte hatte dem deutschen Staat gehört. Die wurde bei der Wiedervereinigung als Transport-Genehmigung zusätzlich vom Staat heraus gegeben und ab ca. 1994 ungültig. Hier gibt es kein unklaren Urheberrechtsstatus. Der dazugehörige Benutzer war der Transport-Unternehmer Heile, der mir übrigens bei allen Firmen-Unterlagen die ich hochgeladen habe, eine Erlaubnis gegeben hatte. Diese befindet sich bei Commons, denn diese wurde extra per e-mail zugesendet. siehe:heile-spedition@t-online.de Gueterverkehr - Fr 19 Dez 2008 18:51:16 CET

mfg vom Elkawe (talk) 18:43, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

• File:Hutablage.jpg

Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 12:01, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Verkehrsausschuss Vorsitzender Udo Schiefner mit Andreas Kernke und Gregor Ter Heide in Berlin 2023.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Verkehrsausschuss Vorsitzender Udo Schiefner mit Andreas Kernke und Gregor Ter Heide in Berlin 2023.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Übergabe der BKF Petition Berlin 2023.jpg
• File:Aktenordner für BKF Petition.jpg
• File:Gespräch wegen der BKF Petition 2023.jpg

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:08, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Guten Tag

Die Bilder sind mit meinem Smartphone mit Einverständnis der anwesenden Personen als Politiker und Privat Person Andreas Kernke aufgenommen worden

Frage: Was ist daran falsch das ich für das Bild die Überschrift gewählt hatte oder muss ich irgend etwas ändern ?

Danke für das Aufpassen Elkawe (talk) 16:43, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hinweis:

Habe nun die

I, the copyright holder of this work, release this work into the public domain. This applies worldwide. In some countries this may not be legally possible; if so: I grant anyone the right to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law.

eingefügt und hoffe das es nun ok ist. MfG vom Elkawe (talk) 17:40, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]