User talk:Duesentrieb

Hi and Happy New Year!

An anom series of edits looks pretty wide of being useful or desirable to me, so I thought maybe you should take a look at it yourself, and perhaps have a checkuser run to see if it can identify an en.wikipedia editor behind http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/82.159.137.19 them.

I left an request on the IP talk page {82.159.137.19) asking for a discussion. This, for ecample links via {{Meta|Categorical index}} to a non-existant page on Meta.
   This, links to a duplicate page ( [[w:Wikipedia:Commons categories|Wikipedia:Commons categories]] on en.wp w:Wikipedia:Commons categories to Commons:categories here, which provides information to wikipedians there about the system here.
   Checking the history on that wikipedia page indicates this is the handywork of Mac... I'll close the below, and make inquiries thereon. IIRC, he's an newcomer as well. I'll make sure this gets cleaned up.

Working bottom upwards in succession...
   The first I reverted. It linked to non-existant Wiktionary pages.
   This introduces a redlink category name that has some sensibility to it's meaning, save it is in the ROOT Category!!!
   This is similar, but to a Category:Category, suggesting to me, this is someone experimentally playing around.
   Here, GeorgHH cured a bad link but appears not to have further investigated this anom's contribs.
   Best regards // FrankB 05:29, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think a handful of edits like these in any way constitutes a vandal; I think you are way over-reacting. If they're not helpful edits, then revert them. I also don't know that Duesentrieb and myself need personal updates on this kind of thing. We have an Administrators' noticeboard. --pfctdayelise (说什么?) 06:40, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tone. Turns out this is the work of a probable 'young' editor, and I posted to WP:AN/I to keep a tighter watch on him. I had some dealings with him before, so I've asked him to fix up by reverting himself. If he doesn't, I will deal with it. But when I started writing the above, many of those pieces were missing or conjecture. // FrankB 07:01, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Duesentrieb,

Could you check the following link please ? http://tools.wikimedia.de/~daniel/WikiSense/CheckUsage.php?i=RER-B_MassyT1.jpg&uselang=fr

The page remains in English on my screen, although I saw you wrote "add uselang=xx to wiki-links;" on m:User:Duesentrieb/CheckUsage.

I can help with French and other languages' translations if you need. Teofilo 12:38, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CheckUsage does not support any internationalization yet. That's what the entry you mentioned is about: adding that support. it's under the "To Do" heading... -- Duesentrieb^(?!) 11:55, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, sorry for the misreading. Teofilo 12:11, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, Duesentrieb, entschuldige, dass ich einen kleinen Test in der 'template:de' vorgenommen habe. Hintergrund ist ein Versuch von User:Alno, der auf meinen Wunsch hin austestet, ob man die Landes - templates mit einem 'inline' keyword auch nebeneinander schreiben kann, wie es bei den alten Landes-templates möglich war. Es ist die Suche nach der Möglichkeit, die commons names z.B. bei Pflanzen und Tieren nebeneinander zu schreiben und nicht nur als Liste untereinander (Wenn Du Zeit hast, siehst Du vielleicht mal auf meiner Disk Seite nach). Wenn das klappt, soll das natürlich keine Veränderung der bisherigen template Funktion sein, sondern eine kleine (optische) Ergänzung. Ich hoffe, Du bist nicht gram über dieses kleine Experiment. Viele Grüße Orchi 01:34, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Naja, es ist ein grundsätzliches Problem, dass den meisten Menschen nicht klar ist, was technisch passiert, wenn sie ein Template bearbeiten. Die Server müssen dann nämlich alle Seite, die das Template benutzen, neu rendern. Und wenn du fünf mal editierst, eben jede fünf mal. Da geht auch schonmal die ganze Site in die Knie.

Ich nehm dir das bestimmt nicht persönlich übel, rate aber dringend dazu, für solche Experimente eine Kopie des Templates anzulegan und damit rumzuspielen. Erst wenn alles passt und es keine Einwände gibt sollte das "echte" Template bearbeitet werden.

Ich glaube ich werde das Problem mal auf der Village Pump ansprechen -- Duesentrieb^(?!) 11:51, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vielen Dank für Deine verständnisvolle Antwort. Ich werd' mich beim Testen in Zukunft bei weitreichenden Problemen zurückhalten oder direkt zu Fachmann kommen. Wenn das hier erläuterte Thema generell besprochen werden soll, zur Verdeutlichung nochmals einige Beispiele:

1. Luscinia megarhynchos offizielle lang template Version (hier noch einmal als Beispiel aufbereitet)
2. Sitta europaea von mir und vielen anderen usern bevorzugte, aber nicht offizielle compact Version, die mit der Seitendarstellung der alten lang templates identisch ist.
3. Ciconia nigra offizielle lang templates in Tabellenform. Optisch eine gute Lösung, aber schwierig zu handhaben bei Ergänzungen und Veränderungen.
4. Ciconia ciconia template lan: Eine gute Lösung. (Ideal, wenn sie im Nebeneinander-Format wäre) Problem: beim Monitor ab 1280x1054 gute Positionierung. Bei verschiedenen Browsern unter 1280x1054 isolierte Darstellung (wie unter 1)

In's Gespräch mit Alno bin ich gekommen, da er in enormer Fleißarbeit die alten lang templates in neue umwandelt. Und noch eine kleine persönliche Anmerkung: ich bin froh, dass ich meine Argumente hier in deutsch anführen kann.(Die Formulierung in englisch ist für mich recht zeitaufwändig) Viele Grüße. Orchi 20:40, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, Duesentrieb, kannst Du bitte einmal schauen, ob die neuste Veränderung bei "template:en und es" sinnvoll ist. Grüße Orchi 17:10, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the information! I have done it. --Nino Barbieri 13:31, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thought I'd let you know this page exists. :)--Orgullomoore 16:44, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The "commons.commons.org" bug is fixed. Also, some of the namespaces were coming up wrong. That's fixed too now. Anything else for the moment (besides the edit success/failure field...working on that right now)?--Orgullomoore 06:53, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I'm not quite sure how to do that, so I'll just wait on you. :P--Orgullomoore 07:01, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There's talk on my talk--Orgullomoore 06:23, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for looking at the Friedrich Kellner gallery page, and thank you also for your kind comment about it. I like the way Wikimedia and Wikipedia work. Scott--Rskellner 16:30, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from BryanBot. 14:35, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is incredibly cool. I take it you could somehow set up your desktop wallpaper to be the POTD, and it would update itself each day? Is there any way to do that for Linux, or is it only a Windows thing? If you point me to some info about it, I'll write up a Commons page for it and we can promote the hell out of it. :) --pfctdayelise (说什么?) 05:17, 19 February 2007 (UTC) Also, what exactly is the copy/pastable code in the last column supposed to be for? pfctdayelise (说什么?) 05:18, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have put up some instructions at meta:User:Duesentrieb/POTD - using this as an automatically updated desktop background was of course the idea. I have been doing that for some months now :)

The copy/pastable code is pretty useless right now, expect it to change or removed. -- Duesentrieb ⇌ 22:25, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I changed this from a marker template to a problem tag. URGH I can't believe this wasn't done before, since most {{Superseded}} are nominated for deletion on Commons:Deletion requests/Superseded, and CommonsTicker only puts +VfD for problem tags, right? So up til now, people were never notified about this... arghhhhhhh.... --pfctdayelise (说什么?) 13:57, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hm... yes, indeed. thank you :) -- Duesentrieb ⇌ 21:34, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I don't know whether you are the right person to bug, if not please tell me who should. We have been creating an archive of the featured pictures of 2006, which we plan to release at the same time as the announcement of the winner of the COM:POTY/2006. As I am really afraid of slashdotting the toolserver, we would like to have it on downloads.wikimedia.org. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:25, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have shell access on the wmf servers, sorry. -- Duesentrieb ⇌ 01:19, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'll ask somebody else. Thanks, -- Bryan (talk to me) 15:06, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Duesentrieb,
ich habe eine Frage, da ich mich nicht besonders gut mit den Commons auskenne. Es ist Zufall, dass ich dich Frage (abgesehen davon, dass ich nach einem deutschen User gesucht habe). Also meine Frage:
Ich suche für die de Wikipedia Bilder aus dem Bereich "Rechtsextremismus" für ein Portal. Leider weiss ich nicht, nach was für einer Kategorie ich da suchen könnte. Es wäre nett, wenn du mir das sagen könntest.
Schon mal Danke, --80.228.66.142 17:08, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, für Rechtsextremismus spuckt FindImages nur Image:Mlodziez_wszechpolska.jpg aus - für Neonazi ist es schon deutlich mehr. Von diesen Bildern ausgehen scheinen Category:Nationalism und vor allem Category:Neo-Nazism vielversprechend. Aber Vorsicht: auf den ersten Blick zumindest scheinen einige der Bilder dort nicht frei zu sein, besonders die Grafiken. Muss mir den Bereich wohl mal genauer anschauen. -- Duesentrieb ⇌ 21:15, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dankeschön, werde ich mir angucken! Gruß, --80.228.67.32 15:19, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Duesentrieb. I have a question about Image:PD-icon.png. Is this your work? That is, did you invent the design? Since this image is very widely used, even out of Wikimedia projects, I like to know the inventor. Maybe, I will note the fact in Wikipedia article. Thanks.--fryed-peach 14:12, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I didn't counciously copy the design, so you could say I invented it. But simply striking an already well-established symbol is hardly original - the design is so obvious, it has probably been invented 100 times over. That's one of the reasons I marked the item itself as PD-ineligible. -- Duesentrieb ⇌ 17:44, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see. It is purely public domain. Thank you for a kind reply. --fryed-peach 23:31, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Daniel, kannst du eventuell diese Vorlage beim Commons-Ticker berücksichtigen, wenn der Uploader sie auf seiner Disk/Benutzerseite hat? Gruß, --Flominator 19:47, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

eventuell, vielleicht, falls die Vorlage auf ein wiki zeigt, in dem der ticker 'nen accout hat. Und für alte Versionen des Bildes wirds wohl auch nicht gehen. Bevor ich mich darum kümmere, muss ich aber erstmal den aktuellen rewrite fertigmachen (integration von CommonsDelinker, vor allem).

Schreib'S mir doch auf meta:User_talk:Duesentrieb/CommonsTicker, damit ich's nicht vergesse -- Duesentrieb ⇌ 20:21, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Flominator 20:37, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Düsen! I have proposed myself for adminship; please go to the nomination page and support me with your vote. Thank you! – Tintazul ^talk 11:28, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Duesentrieb,

Haven't seen you around for a while, so I presume you are busy with real life business. Hope all is well.

If/when you get a chance, would I be able to get some usage stats on the POTD feed? (I recall you showed me a page with stats once, but I didn't bookmark the URL.) The mailing list will soon have 500 subscribers so I thought it could be another good promotional opportunity.

Also, an anon user asked why there was no atom feed. Would one be hard to set up?

thanks, pfctdayelise (说什么?) 14:00, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Yea, real life has got me busy right now.

Usage stats are at http://tools.wikimedia.de/~daniel/potd/stats/ - though i'm not sure how useful they are: there appears to be an increase in usage this month, but it dropped off steeply after a couple of days, and > 60% of the requests in June is reported to have come from an "Microsoft URL Control" which I have never seen before; my guess is that is was simply a single automatic-wallpaper script gone wrong, sending requests every few seconds... So, stats are there, but have to be taken with a lump of salt.

Looking just at the condensed feeds, I see only 776 loads for the last 9 days, that's about 3 per hour. Looking at the feeds and forwards for the Commons POTD last month, i see about 40k requests, that's 55 per hour. Note however that many people watch the POTD via a syndicated feed, like http://open.wikiblogplanet.com/ or a reader like http://www.google.com/reader, and will thus not show up. Anyway, when the feed was broken, one of the people who notified me of it was a KDE developer writing a widget to show the POTD - so that's pretty cool :)

Adding Atom feeds is sure possible, but not high on my list: it would clutter the interface even more, and pretty much anything that supports atom also supports RSS. Atom is the "better" format in principle, IMHO, but not necessarily in practice. Anyway, it's open source, the template that generate the RSS are pretty straight forward, see [2] and [3]. So if anyone feels like providing atom templates... so much the better :) -- Duesentrieb ⇌ 22:17, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo!

Kannst Du mir vielleicht hierbei helfen?:

Template talk:Duplicate#Link to CommonsDelinker

Danke! --ALE! ¿…? 21:12, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

HI Duesentrieb. If I add a deletion template on a template that is transcluded on an image, such as I did on Template:sxc-warning, does it show up in the CommonsTicker? And if not, is there a way to notify the communities of the pending deletion. -- Bryan (talk to me) 13:21, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The template "Template:Lang" is protected and I can't edit it. Please categorize it correctly with the parameter as follows.

<noinclude>[[Category:Internationalization templates|{{PAGENAME}}]]</noinclude>

--SantaClaus 19:15, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Düsentrieb, könntest Du bitte die erste Version von Image:PelletTruckOnBoardScale.jpg löschen? Ich hab' in der neueren Version das Kennzeichen übermalt, dass es da keine Probleme gibt. Danke! --Vesta 16:12, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Just wondering if the image in the top right corner of you're toolserver page exists here on Commons as well. Many thanks /Lokal_Profil 05:49, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The actual code is on the meta page Cary Bass ^demandez 19:01, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dein Check-Usage-Tool funktioniert irgendwie nicht mehr:

A database error has occurred Query: INSERT INTO log ( `status`, `timestamp`, `script`, `params`, `client` ) VALUES ( 'started', '20070927152728', '/~daniel/WikiSense/CheckUsage.php', '{}', '89.15.123.168' ) Function: wsfScriptLogInsert Error: 1290 The MySQL server is running with the --read-only option so it cannot execute this statement (sql)

- script start not logged! logging end anyway.

Ist das normal? Oder ist da was schief gegangen? --AndreR 15:28, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the database refused to be written to. This has been fixed some days ago i suppose. -- Duesentrieb ⇌ 21:30, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have suggested a translation to Catalan at MediaWiki talk:Extra-tabs.js/ca. Please, add the MediaWiki, thanks. --Vriullop 19:01, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't maintain the javascript tabs stuff... I don't know much about it, actually. -- Duesentrieb ⇌ 21:29, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Siebrand tells me that you are the one to talk to about CommonSense categorisation.

User:SieBot has placed an awful lot of images in Category:Music by country and Category:Musicians by country. These catgories are not intended to contain images directly. I've spent several hours cleaning up most of the former and am making headway on the latter.

I gather that the theory is that "any category is better than no categories at all." I half agree, but when images are placed in categories that should contain only categories, not images, it encourages other people also to place images there. I'd much rather we had something like "music images needing classification" for the bot to use. Is this at all possible? (We certainly have categories like Category:Unidentified plants.) - Jmabel | talk 17:13, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CommonSense makes suggestions - they are not intended to be applied unquestioningly, or even automatically. The interface clearly states that. It does a lot of guessing, and it often guesses wrong. -- Duesentrieb ⇌ 21:28, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Then is there some chance that you and Siebrand could discuss this, because his tool is applying these automatically. - Jmabel | talk 18:26, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More than two years on this is still happening with some categories. I've been cleaning up a bunch of pictures that wound up in Category:Schools in South Dakota that were from places like Indiana and Illinois. They also got placed in Category:Schools in North Dakota as well. Not a huge deal. I cleared up the ones I found with out too much work. I don't know what if anything you can do about it. I just thought you should know it is still happening. --Sdgjake (talk) 17:32, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Rosetta2.jpeg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. CO₂ 21:46, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Duesentrieb,

auf die commons habe ich Niederschlagsdiagramme hochgeladen. Leider ist mir ein Fehler unterlaufen; bei einigen stimmt der kumulierte Jahresniederschlag nicht. Jetzt bin ich auf der Suche nach einer Möglichkeit einer Massenlöschung der unten angegebenen Dateien; bis ich die fehlerhaften Dateien korrigiert habe. Hast du die entsprechenden Rechte? Falls nicht, an wen könnte ich mich wenden. --LoKiLeCh 21:15, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ABENBERG_nieder.svg, ADELBERG_nieder.svg, AFFING_nieder.svg, AKEN_ELBE_nieder.svg, ALBACHING_nieder.svg, ALBSTADT_BURGFELDEN_nieder.svg, ALDERSBACH_nieder.svg, ALLENDORF_EDER_OSTERFELD_nieder.svg, ALPERSTEDT_nieder.svg, ALTDOEBERN_nieder.svg, ALTENTHANN_nieder.svg, ALTUSRIED_KRUGZELL_nieder.svg, ALVESLOHE_nieder.svg, AMBERG_UNTERAMMERSRICHT_nieder.svg, ANNATURM_nieder.svg, ATHENSTEDT_nieder.svg, AUGSBURG_HOCHABLASS_nieder.svg, AULENDORF_SPIEGLER_nieder.svg, BAHNSDORFNL_nieder.svg, BAIERSBRONN_RUHESTEIN_nieder.svg, BALDERSCHWANG_nieder.svg, BALGSTAEDT_nieder.svg, BAMBERG_ATAENNIG_nieder.svg, BAMBERG_WEWA_nieder.svg, BARSSEL_LOHER_OSTMARK_nieder.svg, BARTH_AWST_nieder.svg, BASSUM_A_nieder.svg, BAUMGARTEN_nieder.svg, BEBRA_IBA_nieder.svg, BECHHOFEN_MFR_VOGGENDF_nieder.svg, BEILNGRIES_nieder.svg, BENDORF_nieder.svg, BERCHING_nieder.svg, BERGE_NDS_nieder.svg, BERGISCH_GLADB_REFRATH_nieder.svg, BERLIN_ROSENTHAL_nieder.svg, BERLIN_FROHNAU_nieder.svg, BERLIN_JOHANNISTHAL_nieder.svg, BERLIN_LICHTERFELDE_OST_nieder.svg, BERLIN_SCHOEN_FLUGWEWA_nieder.svg, BERNKASTEL_nieder.svg, BERTHELSDORF_nieder.svg, BERUS_AWST_nieder.svg, BIBRABAD_nieder.svg, BIELEFELD_BRACKWEDE_nieder.svg, BINZ_nieder.svg, BISCHHAGEN_nieder.svg, BISPINGEN_HUETZEL_nieder.svg, BLANKENHAIN_DROESSNITZ_nieder.svg, BLECKEDE_nieder.svg, BLIESKASTEL_BRENSCHELB_nieder.svg, BODENFELDE_FOWINNEFELD_nieder.svg, BODENTEICH_BAD_nieder.svg, BOEBING_nieder.svg, BOLLERSDORF_nieder.svg, BRACHSTEDT_HOHEN_nieder.svg, BRACHTTAL_SPIELBERG_nieder.svg, BREDDENBERG_nieder.svg, BRETTEN_DUERRENBUECHIG_nieder.svg, BROMBACHTAL_KIRCH_BROMB_nieder.svg, BRUCKBERG_NDB_POERNDORF_nieder.svg, BUCHHOLZ_IDNORDHEIDE_nieder.svg, BUCHLOE_nieder.svg, BUEDINGEN_nieder.svg, BUERCHAU_nieder.svg, BURBACH_WUERGENDORF_nieder.svg, BURG_SPREEWALD_nieder.svg, BURGSTAEDT_nieder.svg, BURGWALD_WIESENFELD_nieder.svg, CARLSFELD_TS_WEITERW_nieder.svg, CASTELL_nieder.svg, CLAUSTHAL_ZELLERFELD_nieder.svg, COESFELD_nieder.svg, COTTBUS_WEWA_nieder.svg, CREGLINGEN_nieder.svg, DAMMHAUS_nieder.svg, DANNENBERG_NDS_nieder.svg, DASBURG_nieder.svg, DETTELBACH_EFFELDORF_nieder.svg, DEUSELBACH_AWST_nieder.svg, DIELHEIM_HORRENBERG_nieder.svg, DIESDORF_nieder.svg, DIETERSKIRCHEN_nieder.svg, DILLENBURG_nieder.svg, DOBRA_nieder.svg, DORMAGEN_ZONS_nieder.svg, DORNSTETTEN_AACH_nieder.svg, DORTMUND_KRUCKEL_nieder.svg, DRANSFELD_OSSENFELD_nieder.svg, DROLSHAGEN_BLECHE_nieder.svg, DUERRENHOFE_nieder.svg, ECKERSDORF_BUSBACH_nieder.svg, EGLING_ISAR_THANNING_nieder.svg, EILENBURG_nieder.svg, EISFELD_WAFFENROD_HINTER_nieder.svg, ELTVILLE_nieder.svg, EMSDETTEN_nieder.svg, ENGER_nieder.svg, ENNEPETAL_MILSPE_nieder.svg, ENNIGERLOH_OSTENFELDE_nieder.svg, EPPINGEN_ELSENZ_nieder.svg, ERFURT_MITTELHAUSEN_nieder.svg, ESCHAU_WILDENSEE_nieder.svg, ESCHENLOHE_nieder.svg, ESLOHE_nieder.svg, ESSENBAD_nieder.svg, ETTAL_nieder.svg, ETZLEBEN_nieder.svg, FINSING_nieder.svg, FLOERSBACHTAL_MOSBORN_nieder.svg, FLOSS_nieder.svg, FLOSSENBUERG_nieder.svg, FOERITZ_OERLSDORF_nieder.svg, FORCHTENBERG_SINDRINGEN_nieder.svg, FORSTINNING_nieder.svg, FRANKENSTEIN_nieder.svg, FRANKFURT_M_PRAUNHEIM_nieder.svg, FRAUENSEE_nieder.svg, FREIBERG_nieder.svg, FREIBURG_IBR_SCHLIERBG_nieder.svg, FREIENSTEINAU_nieder.svg, FREILASSING_nieder.svg, FREISEN_SAAR_OBERKIRCHEN_nieder.svg, FREUDENBERG_OPF_nieder.svg, FREYUNG_KREUZBERG_nieder.svg, FRONHAUSEN_nieder.svg, FUERTH_ADSAAR_nieder.svg, FURTWANGEN_nieder.svg, GARMISCH_P_ECKBAUER_nieder.svg, GEISA_A_nieder.svg, GEISENHAUSEN_nieder.svg, GILCHING_nieder.svg, GLOTTERTAL_nieder.svg, GLUECKSTADT_nieder.svg, GNUTZ_nieder.svg, GOERWIHL_SEGETEN_nieder.svg, GOETTIN_nieder.svg, GOTTLEUBABAD_nieder.svg, GRAEFENRODA_nieder.svg, GRAFLING_MUEHLEN_nieder.svg, GRAINAU_nieder.svg, GRAMBEK_nieder.svg, GRANSEE_nieder.svg, GRANZIN_nieder.svg, GRASSAU_nieder.svg, GRAUSTEIN_nieder.svg, GREBENAU_REIMENROD_nieder.svg, GREDING_OESTERBERG_nieder.svg, GREIFSWALD_WEWA_nieder.svg, GREIZ_DOELAU_nieder.svg, GRIMMEN_nieder.svg, GROEBEN_JUETCHENDORF_nieder.svg, GROEDITZ_nieder.svg, GROSS_LUESEWITZ_nieder.svg, GROSS_WITTENSEE_nieder.svg, GROSSGOERSCHEN_nieder.svg, GROSSGRIMMA_DEUMEN_nieder.svg, GROSSKORBETHA_nieder.svg, GROSSLEHNA_ALTRANSTAEDT_nieder.svg, GRUENBACH_nieder.svg, GRUIBINGEN_nieder.svg, GUENTERSBERGE_GUT_BAERE_nieder.svg, GUETZKOW_nieder.svg, GUTACH_IBR_BLEIBACH_nieder.svg, HALDENSLEBEN_nieder.svg, HAMBURG_HAHNOEFERSAND_nieder.svg, HAMMELBURG_nieder.svg, HARTMANNSDORF_KRSSAALE_nieder.svg, HASLACH_IM_KINZIGTAL_nieder.svg, HASTE_nieder.svg, HASTEDT_nieder.svg, HEILIGENSTADT_nieder.svg, HEILIGENSTADT_KALTENEBER_nieder.svg, HEILIGENSTADT__EICHSFELD_nieder.svg, HELLENTHAL_HOLLERATH_nieder.svg, HELMSTEDT_nieder.svg, HELSA_nieder.svg, HENNEF_nieder.svg, HENNEF_STADT_BLANKENBERG_nieder.svg, HEPSTEDT_nieder.svg, HERRENALBBAD_nieder.svg, HERRENHOF_nieder.svg, HERSBRUCK_nieder.svg, HILDERS_DIETGES_nieder.svg, HILLSCHEID_nieder.svg, HINDELANG_OBERJOCH_nieder.svg, HINDFELD_nieder.svg, HIRSCHAU_nieder.svg, HOECHENSCHWAND_AKKST_nieder.svg, HOERSTEL_nieder.svg, HOF_HOHENSAAS_WEWA_nieder.svg, HOFBIEBER_ELTERS_nieder.svg, HOFGEISMAR_BEBERBECK_nieder.svg, HOFHEIM_TS_nieder.svg, HOHENBURG_MENDORFERBUCH_nieder.svg, HOHENFELS_nieder.svg, HOHENWARTE_nieder.svg, HOHWACHT_nieder.svg, HOLTHUSEN_nieder.svg, HOLZDORF_SEEHOLZ_nieder.svg, HOMBURGBAD_SAALBURG_nieder.svg, HOPPENRADE_GARZ_nieder.svg, HORB_BETRA_nieder.svg, HORGENZELL_HAPPENWEILER_nieder.svg, HUDE_OL_nieder.svg, HUELL_nieder.svg, HUNGEN_VILLINGEN_nieder.svg, HUSUM_nieder.svg, IDSTEIN_nieder.svg, IMMENSTADT_WAERTERHAUS_nieder.svg, INGOLSTADT_nieder.svg, ISERLOHN_nieder.svg, ISSERODA_nieder.svg, JESTEBURG_nieder.svg, JORK_MOORENDE_nieder.svg, JUEHNSDORF_nieder.svg, KAARSSEN_LAAVE_nieder.svg, KAHL_MAIN_nieder.svg, KAISHEIM_NEUHOF_nieder.svg, KASSEL_HARLESHAUSEN_nieder.svg, KAUFBEUREN_nieder.svg, KELHEIM_nieder.svg, KINHEIM_nieder.svg, KIRCHDORFKRDIEPHOLZ_nieder.svg, KISSINGENBAD_WEWA_nieder.svg, KLEINMACHNOW_nieder.svg, KNAU_nieder.svg, KOELN_WAHN_FLUGWEWA_nieder.svg, KOENIGSHUETTE_HARZ_UE_nieder.svg, KOENIGSMOOR_nieder.svg, KOERPERICH_nieder.svg, KOESENBAD_nieder.svg, KONSTANZ_WEWA_nieder.svg, KOSEROW_nieder.svg, KRAILLING_nieder.svg, KRONACH_nieder.svg, KUEHNDORF_nieder.svg, KUESTRIN_KIETZ_nieder.svg, LANDSBERG_nieder.svg, LANDSTUHL_nieder.svg, LANGELSHEIM_ASTFELD_nieder.svg, LANGENHAGEN_nieder.svg, LANGFOERDEN_nieder.svg, LANGGOENS_NIEDERKLEEN_nieder.svg, LAUDA_KOEN_GERLACHSHEIM_nieder.svg, LEHBECK_nieder.svg, LEHESTEN_THUERWALD_nieder.svg, LEIPZIG_SCHK_FLUGWEWA_nieder.svg, LENGEFELD_nieder.svg, LEUTKIRCH_nieder.svg, LIBEHNA_nieder.svg, LICHTENHORST_nieder.svg, LIEBENAU_LAMERDEN_nieder.svg, LINDENBERG_OBS_nieder.svg, LINDENFELS_nieder.svg, LINDOW_MARK_nieder.svg, LINGERHAHN_nieder.svg, LINTHE_nieder.svg, LIPPENDORF_KIERITZSCH_nieder.svg, LOENINGEN_MEERDORF_nieder.svg, LONSEE_ETTLENSCHIESS_nieder.svg, LOOPE_nieder.svg, MAEHRING_nieder.svg, MAGDEBURG_WEWA_nieder.svg, MAINHAUSEN_ZELLHAUSEN_nieder.svg, MALCHOW_nieder.svg, MALSBURG_M_FRIEDRICHSH_nieder.svg, MARBURG_DILSCHHAUSEN_nieder.svg, MARIENHEIDE_MUELLENBACH_nieder.svg, MARQUARDT_A_nieder.svg, MECHTERSEN_nieder.svg, MEERSBURG_nieder.svg, MEINERZHAGEN_nieder.svg, MEINERZHAGEN_A_nieder.svg, MEMMINGEN_nieder.svg, MESPELBRUNN_nieder.svg, MITTELPOELLNITZ_nieder.svg, MOCHAU_nieder.svg, MOEMBRIS_NIEDERSTEINBACH_nieder.svg, MOERNSHEIM_nieder.svg, MOSBACH_DIEDESHEIM_nieder.svg, MUDAU_SCHLOSSAU_nieder.svg, MUENCHEBERG_nieder.svg, MUENDEN_HEDEMUENDEN_nieder.svg, MUENSINGEN_APFELSTETTEN_nieder.svg, MUENSTERHAUSEN_nieder.svg, MUNDERKINGEN_nieder.svg, NEU_POSERIN_nieder.svg, NEUGATTERSLEBEN_nieder.svg, NEUHARDENBERG_nieder.svg, NEUKIRCHEN_SEIGERTSHAUSN_nieder.svg, NEUKIRCHEN_OPF_HAID_nieder.svg, NEUREICHENAU_DUSCHLBERG_nieder.svg, NEUREICHENAU_KLAFFERSTR_nieder.svg, NEUSAESS_nieder.svg, NEUWIED_nieder.svg, NEUWIED_A_nieder.svg, NIDDA_OBER_LAIS_nieder.svg, NIEDERWIESA_nieder.svg, NIEGRIPP_nieder.svg, NIEMEGK_nieder.svg, NORDGEORGSFEHN_nieder.svg, NORDHACKSTEDT_nieder.svg, NUERNBERG_REICHELKELLER_nieder.svg, OBERAU_nieder.svg, OBERKOTZAU_nieder.svg, OBERLICHTENAU_NIEDERL_nieder.svg, OBEROEWISHEIM_nieder.svg, OBERPIERSCHEID_PHILIPPS_nieder.svg, OBERREICHENBACH_nieder.svg, OBERRIED_ZASTLER_nieder.svg, OBERSCHEINFELD_APPENFEL_nieder.svg, OBERSTAUFEN_STEIBIS_nieder.svg, OBERSTEINA_nieder.svg, OBERURSEL_nieder.svg, OBERWEISSBACH_nieder.svg, OCHSENBACH_nieder.svg, OCHSENKOPF_nieder.svg, OERLINGHAUSEN_nieder.svg, OFFLEBEN_nieder.svg, OHLENSTEDT_nieder.svg, OHLSBACH_nieder.svg, OPFENBACH_nieder.svg, OPPENHEIM_nieder.svg, ORANIENBURG_nieder.svg, OSNABRUECK_AWST_nieder.svg, OSTERBURG_ALTMARK_nieder.svg, OSTERFELD_AWST_nieder.svg, OSTERHOFEN_nieder.svg, OTTENSTEIN_nieder.svg, OTTERNDORF_nieder.svg, OTTERSBERG_OTTERSTEDT_nieder.svg, OWINGEN_nieder.svg, PASSAU_MAIERHOF_nieder.svg, PECHBRUNN_nieder.svg, PEITZ_nieder.svg, PELZERHAKEN_nieder.svg, PENNEWITZ_nieder.svg, PERLESREUT_nieder.svg, PETERSAURACH_WICKLESGR_nieder.svg, PETERSBERG_DREHLITZ_nieder.svg, PINNOW_KRPRIGNITZ_nieder.svg, PLETTENBERG_nieder.svg, PLOCHINGEN_nieder.svg, POCKAU_FORCHHEIM_nieder.svg, POLENZ_nieder.svg, POLSTERBERG_nieder.svg, POSTERSTEIN_nieder.svg, POTZLOW_nieder.svg, PRENZLAU_EWALDSHOF_nieder.svg, QUICKBORN_nieder.svg, RAESFELD_ERLE_nieder.svg, RAHDEN_VARL_nieder.svg, RANSTADT_OBER_MOCKSTADT_nieder.svg, RECHLIN_nieder.svg, REHAU_nieder.svg, REINSDORF_KRTELTOW_FL_nieder.svg, REINSTEDT_nieder.svg, REINSTORF_HOLZEN_nieder.svg, RENGSDORF_NST_nieder.svg, RHEINBERG_nieder.svg, RHINOW_nieder.svg, RIENECK_nieder.svg, RIETZ_B_BRANDENBURG_nieder.svg, RIMPAR_nieder.svg, RINGGAU_RENDA_nieder.svg, ROCHLITZ_nieder.svg, RODING_NEUBAEU_nieder.svg, ROHR_nieder.svg, RONNEBURG_nieder.svg, RONNEBURG_HUETTENGESAESS_nieder.svg, RONSHAUSEN_nieder.svg, ROSTOCK_WARNEM_WEWA_nieder.svg, ROTTHALMUENSTER_nieder.svg, RUDERTING_nieder.svg, RUHLA_nieder.svg, RUNKEL_ESCHENAU_nieder.svg, RUTESHEIM_nieder.svg, SALZFURTKAPELLE_nieder.svg, SANGERHAUSEN_nieder.svg, SATERLAND_RAMSLOH_nieder.svg, SATERLAND_SEDELSBERG_nieder.svg, SCHALLSTADT_MENGEN_nieder.svg, SCHENKLENGSFELD_ERDMANNR_nieder.svg, SCHIELO_nieder.svg, SCHILLINGSFUERST_nieder.svg, SCHILTACH_nieder.svg, SCHLEIDEN_SCHOENESEIFFEN_nieder.svg, SCHLESWIG_STADTFELD_nieder.svg, SCHLEUSINGEN_nieder.svg, SCHLOSSVIPPACH_nieder.svg, SCHMALKALDEN_nieder.svg, SCHMERGOW_nieder.svg, SCHMIEDEFELD_ARSTG_nieder.svg, SCHMIEDEFELD_KRSSAALF_nieder.svg, SCHNEIZLREUTH_WEISSBACH_nieder.svg, SCHOENBERG_IN_HOLSTEIN_nieder.svg, SCHOENBRUNN_OBERNEUBRUNN_nieder.svg, SCHOENINGEN_nieder.svg, SCHOENSEE_DIETERSDORF_nieder.svg, SCHOPFHEIM_EICHEN_nieder.svg, SCHOPFHEIM_SCHWEIGMATT_nieder.svg, SCHOTTEN_nieder.svg, SCHUETTORF_nieder.svg, SCHWAAN_nieder.svg, SCHWANEWEDE_nieder.svg, SEEHAUSEN_WEWA_nieder.svg, SEELBACH_nieder.svg, SEEWALD_BESENFELD_nieder.svg, SEIFARTSDORF_nieder.svg, SIETOW_nieder.svg, SIGGELKOW_OT_REDLIN_nieder.svg, SKASKA_nieder.svg, SONDERSHAUSEN_nieder.svg, SONTHEIM_nieder.svg, SPEYER_nieder.svg, STADERSAND_nieder.svg, STADLAND_SEEFELD_nieder.svg, STADTRODA_nieder.svg, STAHNSDORF_nieder.svg, STECKLENBERG_nieder.svg, STEIMBKE_nieder.svg, STEINAU_MARJOSS_nieder.svg, STEINGADEN_nieder.svg, STEINRODE_WERNINGERODE_nieder.svg, STERUP_nieder.svg, STOECKEY_nieder.svg, STRAELEN_nieder.svg, STRAUSBERG_nieder.svg, STUTTGART_WA_nieder.svg, STUTTGART_HOHENHEIM_nieder.svg, SULZBACH_MAIN_DORNAU_nieder.svg, SUNDERN_LANGSCHEID_nieder.svg, TALHEIM_nieder.svg, TAUNUSSTEIN_HAMBACH_nieder.svg, TETEROW_AWST_nieder.svg, TETTNANG_TANNAU_nieder.svg, TEUPITZ_nieder.svg, TEUTSCHENTHAL_nieder.svg, TIRSCHENREUTH_nieder.svg, TRAUNREUT_FRUEHLING_nieder.svg, TRENDELBURG_LANGENTHAL_nieder.svg, TRIBERG_NUSSBACH_nieder.svg, TWIST_HEBELERMEER_nieder.svg, UETZE_nieder.svg, ULRICHSTEIN_nieder.svg, UMMANZ_LIESCHOW_nieder.svg, UPLENGEN_STAPELERMOOR_nieder.svg, UTERSUM_FOEHR_nieder.svg, UTTING_ACHSELSCHWANG_nieder.svg, VELBURG_ALBERTSHOFEN_nieder.svg, WACKERSLEBEN_nieder.svg, WAGING_AM_SEE_nieder.svg, WALDFEUCHT_HAAREN_nieder.svg, WALDKIRCHEN_nieder.svg, WALDSEEBAD_MITTELURBACH_nieder.svg, WALLDUERN_ALTHEIM_nieder.svg, WALLERFING_NEUSLING_nieder.svg, WALLGAU_OBERNACH_nieder.svg, WALTENHOFEN_MARTINSZELL_nieder.svg, WALTROP_nieder.svg, WASSERLOSEN_nieder.svg, WEBERSTEDT_nieder.svg, WECHINGEN_nieder.svg, WEIDA_nieder.svg, WEIL_DER_STADT_nieder.svg, WEILHEIM_TECK_nieder.svg, WEILROD_GEMUENDEN_TS_nieder.svg, WEILROD_NEUWEILNAU_nieder.svg, WEINBACH_nieder.svg, WEISSACH_nieder.svg, WEISSENBURG_BAY_WEWA_nieder.svg, WEISSENBURG_BAY_ROTHEN_nieder.svg, WEISSENFELS_nieder.svg, WEISSKEISSEL_nieder.svg, WERDA_TALSPGEIGENBACH_nieder.svg, WESELBERG_nieder.svg, WESTERBURG_nieder.svg, WESTEREGELN_nieder.svg, WESTERTIMKE_nieder.svg, WETTELRODE_nieder.svg, WEYHE_MELCHIORSHAUSEN_nieder.svg, WIEDERHOFEN_nieder.svg, WIESEN_nieder.svg, WIETZENDORF_nieder.svg, WILLEBADESSEN_BORLINGHS_nieder.svg, WINKELSETT_RECKUM_nieder.svg, WINKLARN_nieder.svg, WIPPERFUERTH_GARDEWEG_nieder.svg, WIPPRA_TALSP_nieder.svg, WISCHRODA_nieder.svg, WITTENBURG_nieder.svg, WITTIBREUT_nieder.svg, WOERNITZ_nieder.svg, WOERRSTADT_nieder.svg, WOERTH_RHEIN_MAXIMILIAN_nieder.svg, WOHLDE_nieder.svg, WOLFENBUETTEL_nieder.svg, WOLFSBURG_SUELFELD_nieder.svg, WOLFSCHLUGEN_nieder.svg, WULFSEN_nieder.svg, ZAPPENDORF_MUELLERDORF_nieder.svg, ZECHLINERHUETTE_nieder.svg, ZELLKRHOF_nieder.svg, ZEULENRODA_TALSP_nieder.svg, ZIELITZ_nieder.svg, ZIRNDORF_nieder.svg, ZWIESEL_RABENSTEIN_nieder.svg, ZWISCHENAHNBAD_WESTERH_nieder.svg,

Tools are down for weeks now (including some of yours like the "tool server mediasearch", also things like the "check usage" tab tool). Do you know any reason, or have an estimate when they will be up again? Ingolfson 08:53, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I get 500 server errors, by the way. Since sometime in middle January, I think. Always tended to work before. Ingolfson 08:56, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There are certain problems with the toolserver databases. It will be hopefully fixed at the end of the week, unless other problems appear. -- Bryan (talk to me) 09:44, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MediaSearch reads "disabled". Will it be back? I'd like to try it. --Subfader (talk) 17:19, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Patrícia ^msg 14:08, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 07:00, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I ping'd the owner of this message of this image and they agreed with your concern about possible copyvio. Only problem is that the image is in use: he.wp, en.wp, zh.wp & sr.wp . Not sure if you want to continue with this. Also according to the captions on the wp articles the image was taken at "Museum of Man, San Diego, California." --ShakataGaNai ^Talk 06:14, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I saw yesterday that you've listed yourself as a Bot or script originator, and I need some advice on the right tool/tools, especially any existing here which already do the given features I listed. If I can piggy back, see this question and your advice on what I can do to maximize my time cleaning things up a bit. Spent a lot of time manually making fix ups this past week, and its wearing! Thanks. Answer where you like, but at least ping one of my talks with a null edit or a back link, when answered. Thanks. // FrankB 19:43, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Grüssle Mutter Erde (talk) 20:19, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deutsch

Dear Duesentrieb. I am writing to you to inform you that because of inactivity, you may lose your adminship on Commons.

Commons has a new policy on admin activity, Commons:Administrators/De-adminship, taken into use on June 13, 2007 (after a two-week poll on the proposed policy's talk page).

If you want to keep your adminship, you have to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days. Note that if you don't make 5 admin actions in the following 5 months, you will then lose the adminship anyways.

Thank you,
abf /talk to me/ 11:18, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Duesentrieb, I write to you because I believe that you are the Whizz behind the Checkusage tool. Perhaps you want to know that the tool failed to locate this image: Image:Levy 1848 De nyeste forsog i Fodselsstiftelsen i Wien etc.pdf, reporting

691 wikis searched. Levy_1848_De_nyeste_forsog_i_Fodselsstiftelsen_i_Wien_etc.pdf is not used anywhere!

Well, in fact it is used. It is referenced in a footnote at en:Contemporary reaction to Ignaz Semmelweis and in the Danish wikisource wikisource:da:De nyeste Forsög i Födselsstiftelsen i Wien til Oplysning om Barselfeberens Ætiologie.

Thanks for the otherwise fantastic tool, Power.corrupts (talk) 22:11, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In both places, the file was linked to wrongly. At en-WP, the link used "[[Commons:Image:...]]", which should have been simply "[[:Image:...]]" or "[[Media:...]]", and at da-WS, the link used "{{Billede:...}}", which was converted to a plain link by the MediaWiki software because there is no s:da:Template:Billede. It should have been "[[:Billede:...]]". I've corrected both instances. Lupo 06:39, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarification and the tech tips. I always test links to ensure they are functional; if they are, I just assume everything is fine. There are quite a number of weird tweaks in the wiki software. Power.corrupts (talk) 07:41, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Duesentrieb,
I actually thought that it was on Special:Statistics before that special page has changed its look, but a link to http://wikistics.falsikon.de/latest/wikimedia/commons/ is missing on Special:Statistics. I think this could be useful. I was just looking/wondering because of that discussion ;-) --- Best regards, Melancholie (talk) 19:16, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thanks -- Duesentrieb ⇌ 20:54, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Although the status reads SNAFU, none of my pcitures recently uploaded (about a week) are visible. Or am I missing essential information? Paul Hermans (talk) 13:19, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for noticing. The copy of the commons database is only up to date on one server, and outdated on the other. -- Duesentrieb ⇌ 13:38, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Duesentrieb! Erst einmal vielen Dank für CommonSense! (Und ja, das meine ich so, denn das Ding war bestimmt einige Arbeit!!) Dann aber... Kann man irgendetwas tun, um CommonSense zu verbessern? Bereits, seit manche Benutzer blind CommonSense-Kategorien benutzen, entsteht sehr viel Mehrarbeit für diejenigen, die die Kategorien instandhalten. Nun aber benutzt auch noch Multichills Bot (und vielleicht auch andere?) CommonSense, und es wird einfach vom Arbeitsaufwand und von der, äh, "nervlichen Belastung" zu viel - viele der Kategorien sind doppelt und damit redundant (ließe sich das nicht herausfiltern?), manche selbst nach Recherche einfach nicht nachvollziehbar. Ich bin leider kein Programmierer, ansonsten würde ich mich gern selbst daransetzen. So bleibt mir nur, inständig um Verbesserungen zu bitten. Herzlichen Dank, Ibn Battuta (talk) 19:27, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Duesentrieb, diese Bilder sind m. E. sämtlich URV, "own work by uploader" kann so kaum hinhauen. Leider weiß ich nicht, wie der Schnelllöschantrag hier funktioniert :-(, deshalb an Dich die Meldung, mit herzlichem Gruß von --Felistoria (talk) 19:36, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bitte kein speedy delete in diesem Falle. Offenbar ist der Künstler der Vater des Hochladers. Ich bin gerade dabei, ihm zu helfen, wie die Angaben zu den Bildern zu korrigieren sind bzw. wie man sich an unser OTRS-Team wenden kann. Die Korrespondenz befindet dazu befindet sich hier. Viele Grüße, AFBorchert (talk) 23:11, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't think this image are part of the deal, are they? Multichill (talk) 17:13, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Duesentrieb, i've been playing around with a template, see {{BArch category header}}. Could you supply me with a list of locations and a list of batches? With those lists i can automaticly create the categories. Multichill (talk) 21:27, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Moin Duesentrieb,

bislang baust Du mit dem BArchBot die Lizenzvorlage wie folgt ein:

{{BArch-License|
|signature=…

Da ist ein unnötiges „|“ drin, es wäre daher schön, wenn Du künftig stattdessen

{{BArch-License
|signature=…

verwenden könntest. Ich weiß, diese Miniänderung wirkt sich nicht auf das Erscheinungsbild aus … ich frag nur deshalb so explizit, weil es sich bei dieser Menge an Uploads dann schon bemerkbar macht und sowas zudem die Eigenart hat, sich ungewollt fortzupflanzen (C&P durch Nutzer) ;-)

done. blöder typo. -- Duesentrieb ⇌ 10:02, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Daneben wäre es m.E. sinnvoll, wenn Du statt == Summary == das flexible == {{int:filedesc}} == und statt ==[[Commons:Copyright tags|Licensing]]:== dann == {{int:license}} == verwenden würdest. Zumindest ist mir nicht bekannt, dass etwas gegen einen weiteren Einsatz spräche (eher im Gegenteil).

ok done. -- Duesentrieb ⇌ 10:02, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ach ja, und dann ist da noch

{{BArch-description|1=…

Dieses sich hier seit den neuen Uploadformularen immer weiter verbreitende „1=“ kann doch genauso gut weg gelassen werden.

Nein, kann man nicht. Wenn die Beschreibung ein = enthält, tut's sonst nämlich nicht richtig. -- Duesentrieb ⇌ 10:02, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, das war's, stimmt :-) --:bdk: 11:07, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dank Dir! Grüßle --:bdk: 02:05, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für die Anregungen! -- Duesentrieb ⇌ 10:02, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hiho, da du ja anscheinend für den Bot verantwortlich zeichnest, würde ich dich bitten, dir vor weiteren Uploads die Diskussionsseite des Projekts mal anzusehen. Da sind schon ein paar Verbesserungsvorschläge/Fehlermeldungen eingetrudelt, die man imho nicht einfach übergehen sollte. (Mir gehts dabei speziell um Commons talk:Bundesarchiv#location auch bei topic und Commons talk:Bundesarchiv#Nazi-Propaganda im Bildbeschreibungstext.) Vielen Dank und Grüße, --Tolanor 04:47, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, ich guck's mir an. -- Duesentrieb ⇌ 10:02, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Duesentrieb. Keine Ahnung, woher nun das neue Template zu den Bundesarchiv-Bildern stammt. Auf Wikimedia Commons kenn ich mich bislang noch überhaupt nicht aus. Jedenfalls habe ich das Gefühl, das (auch?) diese Diskussion nun ignoriert wird. Deshalb hier mein Verbesserungsvorschlag (in Fettdruck die Verbesserungen):

"Das Bundesarchiv hat oftmals historische Originalbeschreibungen aus dokumentarischen Gründen übernommen. Sie Diese können allerdings mitunter fehlerhaft, überholt und / oder politisch extremistisch sein. Sachkorrekturen und alternative Beschreibungen sind von der Originalbeschreibung getrennt erwünscht vorzunehmen."

Vor allem das "oder" ist falsch. Denn die Beschreibung kann z.B. sowohl überholt als auch extremistisch sein! Kannst du hier weiterhelfen? --T.M.L.-KuTV (talk) 21:27, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ich hab das größtenteils eingearbeitet. --~/w ^/Talk 11:33, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Danke Wuzur

@T.M.L: "oder" ist weder in der deutschen Sprache noch in der Logik exklusiv, es schließt ein "und" nicht aus. Sonst wäre das ein "entweder... oder". Ein "und/oder" schadet aber auch nichts.

Ansonsten... ich würde vorschlagen, den Text auf Commons talk:Bundesarchiv zu besprechen. Ich habe die Templates als technische Infrastruktur erstellt und versucht, sie mit vorläufig brauchbarem Inhalt zu füllen. Ich sehe mich nicht als Autorität für den Inhalt. -- Duesentrieb ⇌ 11:53, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ach ja, wenn du meinst, dass die Diskussion ignoriert wird, schreib was auf COM:VP -- Duesentrieb ⇌ 11:56, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für deine Tipps, Duesentrieb. --T.M.L.-KuTV (talk) 12:42, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, Duesentrieb, es geht mir ebenfalls um die Bilder aus dem Bundesarchiv. Grast dein Bot alle verfügbaren Bilder ab und lädt sie hoch oder geschieht das auch auf Anfrage? Ich hätte da nämlich folgendes Bild, was ich für zwei, drei Artikel in der deutschen WP (wahrscheinlich wird das dann auch bei den anderssprachigen Ausgaben eingesetzt) bräuchte: [4] Der Bildpfad ist rechts angegeben (183-C0201-0002-001). -- Platte (talk) 13:26, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Duesentrieb - und wie ist es mit den Bildern aus Kassel: 145 ff ?) Gruß --Delorian (talk) 16:00, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alle verfügbaren Bilder werden hochgeladen. Im moment ist etwa ein drittel (30tuasend) oben, der rest folgt vermutlich nächste Woche.

Wir erhalten allerdings nur solche Bilder aus dem Bundesarchiv, zu dem die ausreichend Rechte haben, sie lizensieren zu können. Das gilt z.B. leider nicht für Bilder vom Pressedienst. -- Duesentrieb ⇌ 18:30, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bei Image:Bundesarchiv Bild 116-121-007, Mitglieder des Deutschen Reichstag.jpg steht 1889. Im Bundesarchiv "1889 ca." Bei Image:Bundesarchiv Bild 137-005516, China, Tsingtau, ehem. Deutsch-asiatische Bank.jpg steht 1867, im Bundesarchiv heißt es 1867/1914. In beiden Fallen sollte die Zeitangabe vollständig übernommen werden, da sonst Verfälschungen entstehen. (vgl. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Bundesarchiv/Error_reports#7._Dezember Eintrag Category:Images from the German Federal Archive, year 1867) --Ephraim33 (talk) 09:40, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fehler in den Angaben vom Bundesarchiv im allgemeinen bitte auf Commons:Bundesarchiv/Error reports melden. Ich schau mir nochmal an, was da genau an Metadaten in den betreffenden Bildern steht. Es könnte sein, dass wir die vollen Angaben garnicht bekommen. -- Duesentrieb ⇌ 12:29, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ich hab mir die Metadaten zu den Bildern nochmal angeguckt (die sind da mit IPCT reinkodiert) -- die Daten stehen da on drin, daran kann ich nichts machen. Das Datumsfeld kann halt kein "ca" und auch kein "zwischen". Das müsste deren Export-Skript irgendwie tricksen.

Wäre toll wenn du dafür sorgen könntest das Bilder mit diesem Fehler gesondert gesammelt würden. -- Duesentrieb ⇌ 15:37, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ich hab mal angefangen Probleme zu sammeln: Commons:Bundesarchiv/problems -- Duesentrieb ⇌ 20:27, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I saw your bot work done for the German archive stuff and I have a query. I've written a script in Perl to batch upload images: User:Nichalp/Upload script. Well, I'm not exactly a programmer, but wrote this script in sheer frustration as there was a lack of similar tools offering such an advanced functionality. What I would like to know is if there is anyway I could use FTP instead of HTTP to upload images to Mediawiki? Thanks in advance. Nichalp (talk) 05:45, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No. what advantage would it have anyway?

For massive uploads (like, several thousand images), the best method is probably to bundle the images into a tar, load that on the servers, and then import the images server-side. which is what was done for the images from the Bundesarchiv. -- Duesentrieb ⇌ 14:18, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't FTP a faster way of file transfer? Nichalp (talk) 07:27, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No. FTP supports multi-file uploads more "natively", uploading by HTTP manually is annoying, if you use HTML's "choos file" thingy. But if it's done by a script, it really doesn't matter much if you use HTTP or FTP or whatever. Actually, i'm not sure if FTP supports implicit compression the way HTTP does, so in some cases, HTTP may even be faster. -- Duesentrieb ⇌ 12:14, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I find you at BArchBot. I need a help. How I can upload fotos from Bundesarchiv? I find some good fotos, and will upload this. Thenks.--Jaro.p (talk) 13:42, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You can only do it manually. But there's no point: not all pictures they have are free enough for us -- many are still owned by third parites. We automatically get all really free pictures for upload by BarchBot. -- Duesentrieb ⇌ 21:41, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think will be great to incorporate image view statistics into gallery tool (like Flickr, Panoramio, etc). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:29, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That kind of statistics isn't easy to get... Maybe we'll have that kind of info available on the toolserver one day. But don't hold your breath. -- Duesentrieb ⇌ 19:48, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für die neuen Fußballdateinamen. sугсго 21:05, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gern geschehen. Leider müssen nun die ganzen alten Seiten durchgegangen und gelöscht werden, siehe Commons:Bundesarchiv/bad names. Aber evtl fällt mir noch was dazu ein, wei man das zumindest teilweise automatisieren kann. -- Duesentrieb ⇌ 10:45, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

---

Hello, Duesentrieb!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:47, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Image:अंग्रेज़ी.png is uncategorized since 12 March 2009. BotMultichillT 05:47, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Image:Glider.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Wau Holland.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Bodenwellen.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Brand Cargolifter Halle.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:US map - states and capitals.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:CircleN.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:US map - rivers and lakes.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.

I sent you a message on http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Duesentrieb/Tools#fetching_descriptions_for_images . I don't know where this should be added, so I put it in the tools section. Hope you can help. --Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 14:45, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Terrorism has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--Liftarn (talk) 18:59, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe u would be interested in this project http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Village_pump#Commons:Batch_uploading --Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 17:48, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, ich habe dich über das Verzeichnis der Administratoren rein zufällig ausgesucht, da ich noch nicht herausgefunden habe, ob es eine zentrale Anlaufstelle für Anfragen an Administratoren gibt. Ich habe vorhin File:Sir Richard Phillips.jpg hochgeladen, allerdings leider zuerst das falsch Bild erwischt. Gibt es, nachdem ich nun das Bild ersetzt habe, eine Möglichkeit die erste Version zu entfernen? Ich denke nämlich, dass das Vorhandensein zweier völlig unterschiedlicher Bilder eventuell zu Verwirrung führen könnte.

Hallo. Ich hab die erste Version des Bildes gelöscht. Die zentrale Anlaufstelle für sowas ist das Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard, der Link steht auch auf Commons:Administrators, fehlte aber auf der deutschen Version, Commons:Administratoren. Ich hab das dort mal hinzugefügt. -- Duesentrieb ⇌ 07:59, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Danke sowohl fürs Löschen als auch für den Hinweis. Viele Grüße

~~ Phoe _talk ~~ 21:01, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, Duesentrieb,

ich habe vor langer Zeit eine Anfrage zum updaten mancher Logos gestellt (siehe [5] & [6]), irgendwie scheint es jedoch, als hätte keiner den Mum die Dateien für ein Update freizuschalten. Deshalb wende ich mich an dich, ich weiß, dass du bei Wikimedia angestellt bist und dass du Deutsch kannst, deshalb du (hrhrhr). Es geht um folgende Dateien:

• File:Commons-logo.svg
• File:Wikimedia-logo.svg

Die neuen Files könntest du dir auch bereits ansehen - damit es keine böse Überraschung gibt:

• http://www.nervenhammer.com/images/Commons-logo.svg (Valide => http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nervenhammer.com%2Fimages%2FCommons-logo.svg )
• http://www.nervenhammer.com/images/Wikimedia-logo.svg (Valide => http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nervenhammer.com%2Fimages%2FWikimedia-logo.svg )

Ich mein's ja nur gut und hoffe, dass zumindest du Interesse an der Verbesserung/Vereinfachung der Logos zum Guten hast.

Liebe Grüße, --Fleshgrinder (talk) 20:36, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The OTRS system is looking for trusted volunteers to help staff our German-language image submission queue. I would like to invite you to look over what OTRS involves and consider signing up at the volunteering page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 00:16, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Duesentrieb. I'm in the process of downloading a collection of 65000 PNGs of high-resolution scans of public domain works from the New York Public Library Digital Collection. They total about 800 GB. I'd like to upload these to Commons in the most efficient manner possible. I've generated image descriptions and filenames for all of them. Could you provide advice on how to go about this? You were recommended in IRC. Thanks! Dcoetzee (talk) 01:44, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I am trying to use Commonsense to suggest suitable supercategories for yet unexisting, "red link" categories on Commons. I found a problem :

• Category:Goomalling, Western Australia is a red link category. When I click this URL, using kw=Goomalling,_Western_Australia, the result is "Nothing found, sorry. Try adding more wikis or entering some keywords".

Why didn't Commonsense find Category:Towns in Western Australia (exactly the same wording as the English Wikipedia's en:Category:Towns in Western Australia ?

I wish we could have in the future a Commonsense/Find supercategories tab on the top of category pages.

Teofilo (talk) 08:54, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See here or here. Probably has something to do with the recent db migration. Multichill (talk) 22:25, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

should be fixed now. thanks for telling. -- Duesentrieb ⇌ 12:37, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Duesentrieb. Keine Ahnung, ob das hier der richtige Platz für derartige Anfragen ist: Kannst du mir bitte mitteilen, warum bei dieser Datei unter "Dateiverwendungen" steht: "Keine Seite benutzt diese Datei"? Dies obwohl sie hier in einem Artikel eingebunden ist? Ratlos bin... Grüße, --T.M.L.-KuTV (talk) 22:55, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hat sich anscheinend erledigt. Wie ich gerade festgestellt habe, beziehen sich dort gelistete Links wohl nur auf Wikimedia Commons, nicht auf die Wikipedia-Enzyklopädie. Das finde ich allerdings auf dem ersten Blick etwas irreführend ... --T.M.L.-KuTV (talk) 23:14, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Daniel, I'm not sure if you still want to hear about this tool, one I like using. These days I'm using it frequently for images. When doing intersections between two categories, for images, it would be nice if one could select an image view as output (similar to the one being used when just scanning subcategories for images). The title view is great for Wikipedia, but file names are somewhat random. Maybe this isn't too time-consuming to change or it could go into the re-write of the tool. -- User:Docu at 17:13, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please create list of Bundesarchiv images made in Charkow for further categorization? You deleted Category:Images from the German Federal Archive, location Charkow, so it's hard to find related image now. Thank you. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 23:55, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm not able to do that. Maybe User:Duesentrieb has this information. Multichill (talk) 15:19, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo. Ich bin noch zu versuchen, einige Dornier do 217 Bilder geladen aus dem Bundesarchiv, der englische Wikipedia. kann man helfen? Dapi89 (talk) 17:37, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

i don't understand, sorry. plase try again in english. use wikimail if i don't respond. -- Duesentrieb ⇌ 15:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if you've already noticed this thread — I wrote a quick replacement for your CheckUsage tool that's more tolerant of little issues like missing Commons databases. ;) Anyway, I just noticed something funny: as of about 15 minutes ago or so, my tool has started correctly reporting file usage on Commons again, but yours seems still broken. I'm not sure what we're doing differently, just thought you might find it interesting. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 16:54, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You should forward permission for this and similar files to Commons:OTRS (permissions-de-at-wikimedia.org). Multichill (talk) 13:41, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Duesentrieb - I gather these are your creation ;-) I've noticed that when one does an "Upload a new version of this file" even just for a minor edit like removing a watermark (which I've been doing several of recently), the file appears on my gallery, and more importantly, disappears from the gallery of the original uploader. On principle, I don't think this is right; the file should stay on on the gallery of the original uploader, so that they can e.g. keep track of what they've posted. I'm also uneasy about images appearing on my gallery when I don't deserve any credit for them. Can the gallery software be changed so that the file remains on the original uploader's gallery, rather than the editor's? Thanks! - MPF (talk) 13:25, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Duesentrieb - I noticed that the subject pages now display "The WikiSense tools could not be migrated seamlessly from the Toolserver environment to ToolLabs. I'm working on fixing the most important tools, but this may take a few days or even weeks. Sorry for the inconveniance." at https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikisense/Gallery.php. I rather liked the WikiSense Gallery DuesenTool script. I hope it may be fixed. Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ 19:35, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be aware of http://incompetech.com/ 's collection of music tracks in various styles and genres.

It's also under a 'free' license compatible with Commons.

I was thinking these could be hosted as OGG versions on Commons in a suitable category, with a view to them being used by various projects including podcasts, Wikiversity and others..

Would you be willing to approach the creator of the tracks concerned, with a view to getting official approval from them for them to be hosted on Commons, in addition to the 'free' license they are already under?

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:39, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello my friend,
I just saw that modification done by User:Multichill's bot that adds Category:IUCN Near Threatened species to images using CommonSense.
My problem is that I am trying to avoir IUCN cat on images:

• species categories should be in the correct IUCN cat (here Category:Neochen jubata should be in Category:IUCN Near Threatened species)
  • but only through the {{IUCN}} template (Reason: allow us to run a bot to update IUCN id/threatLevel when IUCN changes its mind)
• the images should only be in the species cat, not in the IUCN cat (Category:Neochen jubata here)
  (Reason1: the specimen is not threatened when its species (described by the species cat) is threatened)
  (Reason2: an image should not be in 2 cats (species cat & IUCN cat) if one cat (species cat) is in the other (IUCN cat))

Is there a way to avoid having Category:IUCN XXXXX species in CommonSense?
Cheers Liné1 (talk) 19:33, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See here. Thank you. --Foroa (talk) 07:40, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are two dates on File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-1982-0927-503, Bei El Agheila, Rommel bei italienischer Division.jpg, and I want to be confirmed which one is right?! 1 dicembre 1942, or 12 January 1942. Ironically, Rommel was possibly at El Aghelia at both dates!!--Maher27777 (talk) 21:23, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deutsch | Español | Italian

Dear Duesentrieb. I am writing to you to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you – Kwj2772 (msg) 02:46, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Gallery list much shorter than contribution list. User:Docu said "That does look like a bug". Thanks, Wouter (talk) 09:43, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Another example: Compare contribution list and gallery list. The gallery list contains not any image. Does it has to do with the special characters as in File:ЦачоН.JPG ‎? Regards, Wouter (talk) 12:47, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Duesentrieb, warum werden die von mir hochgeladenen Daeien bis auf 4 Ausnahmen nicht in meiner Galerie angezeigt? Was kann ich tun, damit meine Beiträge wieder in von einem toolserver angezeigt werden? - und warum werde ich ständig ausgeloggt? Gruß und Dank für evtl. Antworten --Kalima (talk) 20:15, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mit der Gallery scheint es ein Problem zu geben:

"A database error has occurred Query: SELECT cl_to as cat FROM categorylinks LEFT JOIN u_daniel_cache.commonswiki_nontopics ON namespace = 14 AND title = cl_to where cl_from = 10041195 AND id IS NULL Function: getCategories Error: 1146 Table 'u_daniel_cache.commonswiki_nontopics' doesn't exist (sql-s4) "

mfg --Mbdortmund (talk) 04:36, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Der Eintrag auf der Mailing Liste: http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/toolserver-l/2010-April/003094.html dürfte deine Frage beantworten. Mit dem städigen Ausloggen hat das aber nix zu tuen, das läuft übers Produktivsystem und über deine Cockies. --Kolossos (talk) 10:47, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, wir hatten das Thema in Berlin, du kannst ja mal schauen: MediaWiki_talk:Gadget-ZoomViewer.js. Ich finds toll! --Kolossos (talk) 10:54, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Daniel. Any ideas why [7] isn't working? I can't help getting the feeling I'm doing it wrong somehow... Always so reliable :) Jarry1250 (talk) 16:44, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I use List compare tool of AWB for make my list of interest. I often use the provider "Category (recursive)" on Commons, that return all pages (also "File:" and "Category:") and that filter this result for obtain only "Content" (i.e. gallery) and "Category:". This execution is very expensive and long because the result list contains more "File:". So I wuold use your tool CatScan for this operation, so:

• I want the result in "Wiki-Text" format for use it in AWB, but now this format, in the search "for all pages", append the category for each single item. E.g., I would this format result, as the search "for all categories":

* [[Dénes_Szekeres]]

and not

* [[Dénes_Szekeres]]: [[:Category:Film_producers|Film_producers]]

Otherwise, add a new search (at least for commons): "for all gallery" for obtain only the page (unless "File:" and "Category:")

Also, maybe is most useful (for count) use the character "#" as first character, instead "*".

• Is possible insert a check box for define the recursive search in "search in category". Is the "recursive" check box is selected, the "depth" will be disable. I have noted that the real max depth is 5, it is correct?

Thanks.--B3t (talk) 09:05, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to try CatScan2 (a link can be added to categories through a gadget in Special:Preferences).  Docu  at 10:40, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, this I search!--B3t (talk) 10:29, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Today it outputs

• Citrus paradisi (Grapefruit, pink) white bg.jpg from commons.wikimedia.org, provided by Raeky
• Calder3.jpg from commons.wikimedia.org, provided by Gerardus
• Superb lyrbird in scrub.jpg from en.wikipedia.org, provided by MPUploadBot

none is particularly fortunate in terms of credits. Maybe the new Commons feature can be used to provide the credits.  Docu  at 10:40, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Duesentrieb! Wäre es möglich ein kleines Helferlein-Programm (Bot oder Ähnliches) zu schreiben, um

1. nach Bildern zu suchen, die eine korrekte Datumsangabe entsprechend der vorgeschlagenen Norm haben

2. die Location-Angabe bei diesen Bildern bei den verlinkten Kategorien zu ermitteln

3. in so gefundene Bilder automatisch einen Kategorien-Link entsprechend dieser Struktur einzubauen (z.B. "2008 in Duisburg").

Falls ein so geschriebenes Programm bei dieser Arbeit auf Probleme stößt (z.B. keine korrekte Datumsangabe, fehlende oder falsche Struktur bei den historischen Angaben), so wäre es ferner sicherlich sinnvoll, dann entsprechende Hinweise in diese Dateien zu schreiben. Ich denke, dass ein solcher Bot sehr sinnvoll wäre. Denn man kommt nunmehr ja fast schon nicht mehr nach mit der versäumten Arbeit bei der Datierung der Fotos (siehe [8]). Und nicht zuletzt jeder historisch Interessierte wird dir sehr dankbar für ein solches Programm sein. Viele Grüße, --BlackIceNRW (talk) 22:15, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Falls du lange keine Antwort kriegst, kannst du dich auch an COM:BWR wenden. --Leyo 10:27, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Duesentrieb. Recently my colleague and I requested a batch upload for our organization Africa Centre. So far no one has responded at the batch upload page as well as Mutlichill on his talk page by myself and my colleague. Could you please take a look at it if you have the time or give us any direction on how to adjust our request. Thank you in advance! Riannedac (talk) 07:49, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stasi_2.0.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ralf Roletschek (talk) 18:49, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User_talk:Timobourdon has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this user page ⧼pageinfo-talkpage⧽, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Timobourdon (talk) 20:28, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How did you do this so quickly: [9]. It took forever for my code to go through each subcategory. Magog the Ogre (talk) 05:32, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Nightfall europe-and-afrika 20050507-184500.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

George Miquilena · talk 14:10, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Construction sites has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

ghouston (talk) 05:42, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for leaving your input. I've responded to your question. --Esemono (talk) 15:38, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Duesentrieb, könntest Du eventuell dieses Bild ohne Wasserzeichen aus dem Bundesarchiv, Bild 183-58610-0003 in Wikimedia Commons hochladen? Oder wenigstens mir erklären, wie man das macht, ich bin da nicht angemeldet, oder darf ich das Bild von dieser Seite hochladen und als Quelle Bundesarchiv angeben, viele Grüße,--PjotrMahh1 (talk) 16:38, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• • Dieses Bild inzwischen gefunden , danke,--PjotrMahh1 (talk) 13:08, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'm currently engaged as a Wikipedian in Residence at the Norwegian Directorate for Cultural Heritage, which has a rather large collection of free licensed images. I noticed that you have been running BArchBot for the Bundesarchive and I was wondering if it would be possible for BArchBot to assist with uploading our pictures on to commons. Profoss (talk) 12:49, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, there is a de-flag proposal at Commons:Bots/Requests/de-flag which affects your bot. Regards --Steinsplitter (talk) 22:33, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Homeless has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Skeezix1000 (talk) 13:26, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! If am not mistaken, you are a toolserver user. Maybe you can help us in a problem related to Cropbot. Please check the discussion at User_talk:Luxo#Cropbot_problem. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 18:00, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	Happy Holidays! Vera (talk) 13:50, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply] Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ Nederlands ∙ +/−

Hi Duesentrieb, I'm writing to you because your bot BArchBot (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information) (assign permissions) is about to be de-flagged as a result of inactivity. If you'd like to keep that account flagged as a bot, please speak up at Commons:Bots/Requests/de-flag#Discussion; otherwise, I'll remove the bot flag from that account in a week from now (20 February 2014). Thanks for your understanding, odder (talk) 22:25, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kannst du Fotos von Boris Jelzin hochladen?

Hi Duesentrieb, I understand that you are the creator of this template and thus may wish to participate in its DR discussion. Эlcobbola _talk 17:07, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

could you please tell me, if it is possible to run SQL on English wikipedia database to find out the user names of the accounts that made the last edit on a specific date? Thanks. 188.132.226.2 00:37, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Esoteric templates has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Rillke^(q?) 01:09, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Motopark, i'm new in wikimedia commons, and i would like to ask you how to put the copyright once you've already downloaded the photo. i expect an answer :)--Giubbotto non ortodosso (talk) 10:26, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Badges_of_rank has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

W like wiki (talk) 14:16, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Smilies has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

↔ User: Perhelion 11:37, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Train stations has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

--Gürbetaler (talk) 19:49, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Duesentrieb, I was wondering if it would make sense to add this file to the Category:Bad Bergzabern. Thank you for your time. :) Lotje (talk) 11:56, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Textiles has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 10:26, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Displays has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 15:32, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Seals has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 12:21, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kites has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 13:53, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons maintenance has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Estopedist1 (talk) 07:48, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Duesentrieb, du wurdest mir als Ansprechpartner für eine kleine Frage empfohlen:

Mir ist gerade bei File:Open Knowledge Foundation Deutschland Logo.svg aufgefallen, dass die Dateiverwendung bei Ansicht über de-wp korrekt angegeben ist, wird bei Ansicht über commons bei der Dateiverwendung unten die gelöschte BNR-Seite de:Benutzer:Knuthuehne/Open Knowledge Foundation Deutschland aufgeführt, dafür der eigentliche Artikel de:Open Knowledge Foundation Deutschland nicht. Kannst du dir erklären, woran das liegen könnte? Viele Grüße --Johannnes89 (talk) 06:04, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sculptures has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Auntof6 (talk) 07:41, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I just discovered your File:Git_operations.svg. It's amazing, thank you for creating it! Netjeff (talk) 19:06, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Toller Bot! Mr. Schnellerklärt (talk) 15:29, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:No license own work has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 15:31, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fantasy_Art has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Estopedist1 (talk) 08:32, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:No_license_own_work has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:15, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decoration has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

JopkeB (talk) 05:20, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Spoken Wikipedia has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Josh (talk) 03:06, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]