User talk:Bjoertvedt

Archive 2007-2011

Please notice many of your bandy photographies are placed in the wrong orientation. J 1982 (talk) 01:20, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes thanks, I know. It is not my fault, it's a problem with Commons after the upload of the newest MediaWiki. There's supposed to be a template to turn them round. And it's supposed to be turned around automatically after a few days by a specific Bot. Bjoertvedt (talk) 01:32, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krsand MAB Batterie Vara 060420091224.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality (I have denoised the image) --Taxiarchos228 22:12, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you uploaded File:Geranium bohemicum 01.jpg and File:Geranium bohemicum 02.jpg as the rare species Geranium bohemicum. In my opinion, both is Geranium sylvaticum which is a common species in Northern Europe. Please, compare with photos in the following pages: [1], [2]. Differences are in the shape (and size) of petals and in the contrasting color of nerves on the petals. Regards --Franz Xaver (talk) 14:37, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

based on geographic distribution data, I agree. I remember the field trip, and I remember certainly that I checked size, leaves etc carefully and found it not to resemble G sylvaticum. But it could have been individual modifications or variances that played me a trick. I am not against renaming. Kind regards, Bjoertvedt (talk) 16:25, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your answer. Now I changed description and categories. I also removed the first photo from several wikipedia articles on Geranium bohemicum. I did not rename files, as File:Geranium sylvaticum 01.jpg and File:Geranium sylvaticum 02.jpg already exist. Regards --Franz Xaver (talk) 15:24, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I dealt with the remaining incorrect Wikipedia and Wikidata use of one of the images and made rename requests for both of them. --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 10:24, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great image! Thanks! --Gampe (talk) 07:20, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, yes I believe this to be me best shot ever. It is taken at 400 meters distance on free hand, so it was an instance of great luck. Thank you very much!! Bjoertvedt (talk) 16:26, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hei Erlend! Kan du legge bildene fra Svalbard i riktig kategori når du laster dem opp? Alle kulturminnekategoriene for Norge (Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Norway) har egne underkategorier for hver kommune, men når det gjelder Svalbard skal bildene i Category:Cultural heritage monuments at Svalbard. Mange fine bilder du har lastet opp! Mvh.--Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 10:52, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oi, det visste jeg ikke! Skal gå igjennom ved anledning1 Bjoertvedt (talk) 12

30, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

This user contributed to the "WLM 2012 - Serbia" photo contest

Hei Erlend! Du har bl.a. lastet opp flere bilder av Lavetthuset i forbindelse med WLM og satt på lok.id. med nummer 115850, slik som f.eks. på dette bildet http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Oslo_Hoved%C3%B6ya_lavett_IMG_8776_rk_115850.JPG Men det id.nummeret går til et skipsvrak som ikke kan sees over vann. Jeg har gjort utvidet søk i kulturminnebasen og kan ikke finne Lavetthuset oppført der. Vet du noe mer om dette? Mvh.--Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 15:28, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hei! Nei, jeg vet ikke mer om det - jeg har bare brukt kart og ikke liste, og da får man ikke med seg at det er f.eks "skipsvrak". De har helt sikkert rett og i så fall bør det stå uten ID-nummer fra RAK. Men huset er fra 16-1700-tallet, så det er vel en del av den høye terskelen vår at ingen av byggene på Hovedøya er kulturminne. Kanskje vi skal utvide begrepet litt neste gang, tror det virker begrensende på mange at så "få" objekter faktisk er med på lista. Mvh, Bjoertvedt (talk) 15:38, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I saw that you uploaded some images twice, with different names: for example File:Ny Aalesund IMG 6490.JPG and File:Ny-Aalesund IMG 6490.JPG, or File:Ny-Aalesund Amundsen villa IMG 6478.JPG and File:Ny Aalesund Roald Amundsen villa IMG 6478.JPG. Could check all your photos in Ny-Alesund and mark for deletion the wrong ones? Thanks :-) bye. --Superchilum^{(talk to me!)} 13:03, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi1 I do not have the total overview, but I can assure that if there are double sets then they will be totally similar, and there is no "right" or "wrong" ones. So if you come over doubles, it is just to delete instantly one of them without any objection from my side. 83.109.105.183 15:42, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

please, choose :-)

• 1a
  1a
• 
  1b KEEP
• 2a
  2a
• 
  2b KEEP
• 3a
  3a
• 
  3b KEEP
• 4a
  4a
• 
  4b KEEP
• 5a
  5a
• 
  5b KEEP
• 5c
  5c
• 
  6a
• 
  6b KEEP
• 6c
  6c
• 7a
  7a
• 
  7b KEEP
• 8a
  8a
• 
  8b KEEP
• 9a
  9a
• 
  9b KEEP

--Superchilum^{(talk to me!)} 08:25, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! It seems that the b's are of somewhat higher light quallity, and they have a common denomination as "Ny Ålesund". Is it possible to keep them and delete the rest? Thx, Bjoertvedt (talk) 18:18, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Done -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 11:12, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ русский ∙ slovenčina ∙ српски (ћирилица) ∙ srpski (latinica) ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ українська ∙ +/− Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012! Dear Bjoertvedt, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 21:59, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I am strongly assuming that you mixed up the text of two uploaded pictures, File:Morse key n jacobsen mek verksted 1935 IMG 3776 telenor bergen.JPG and File:Vibroplex morse key 1940-50s IMG 3774 telenor bergen.JPG. The key with the grey metal base is the Vibroplex. --Cqdx (talk) 17:35, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

might be. I am 100% sure that the explanation cards were thus placed, but they might have been switched around. The name "Vibrople" is certainly visible at the plate of the grey one! Is it possible to have the names changed, aswell? BR, Bjoertvedt (talk) 18:58, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Then the exhibition confused the cards. Jacobsen was a Norwegian manufacturer of telegraph keys ([3]), Vibroplex is American, famous for the pendulum, which generates dots automatically, and still in buiness ([4]). For renaming in Commons, I suggest to use Template:Rename --Cqdx (talk) 19:56, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, My name is Duane Hurst and I recently made a free (non-commercial) English web site to share information with people. I added links to your Wikipedia/Wikimedia freeware picture (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Muuga.jpg). I also gave credit to you on my web pages for your work. Thank you for sharing with the public. My website is:

http://www.freeenglishsite.com/

I add pictures such as yours to one of the following major sections of my site: 1. World section - contains information and over 10,000 images of every world country and territory. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/world/index.htm

2. USA section - contains information and images of every USA state and territory. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/world/usa/index.htm

3. English section - "Mel and Wes" lessons in conversation format. Stories are located in various USA states and world countries such as China, England, Germany, Japan, Mexico and Thailand. Each lesson has many slang terms and idioms, which I link to my Slang Dictionary. This eventually will have over 5,000 terms. Currently, it has about 3,000 slang and idioms. I regularly add new lessons and slang terms. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/english/lessons/index.htm Slang Dictionary link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/english/slang/Eslang_a.htm

Prior to retirement, I taught English at several private and public universities in the United States.

Please share this free site with your friends. I hope all will enjoy the pictures and find the English information useful. Sincerely,  Duane Hurst in Utah, USA

Email address: duanerhurst@freeenglishsite.com --75.162.209.2 07:24, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your email and the credit! My photos are all free to be used by everyone! Good luck in your further work... Bjoertvedt (talk) 09:43, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Bjoertvedt,

I changed the ID of the following images from Category:Succisa pratensis to Category:Knautia arvensis, because Succisa pratensis has blue, rather symmetrical flowers that are not so much different in size (see e.g. File:SuccisaPratensis2.jpg). Apparently there is no other species of Knautia in Norway, at least according to the rather old Flora Europaea. So this should be Knautia arvensis:

Thanks, you've been quite right about this one! Is is a bit strange that I have confused these ones since I have myself used one of them in the norwegian article on Knautia arvensis.... Kind regards, Bjoertvedt (talk) 17:14, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

These three images show Kalmia procumbens (sometimes called Loiseleuria procumbens), not Saxifraga oppositifolia:

• File:Saxifraga oppositifolia rodsildre IMG 3424 norefjell.jpg
• 
• File:Saxifraga oppositifolia rodsildre IMG 3436 norefjell.jpg

I corrected the categories, but I have not attempted to have these images renamed.

Thankls alot, these ones are also misplaced by me. They are what we call "greplyng". Kind regards, Bjoertvedt (talk) 17:20, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I also found a few photographs, which were supposed to show Saxifraga aizoides, which is obviously not the case; I suggest that they show some plant from the Brassicaceae family (with 4 petals instead of the usual 5 for Saxifraga aizoides, just for example!), possibly a Draba species. Unfortunately there seems to be quite a number of species from this genus in the area - and I do not even know whether the genus is right. These are the misidentified flower pictures:

• File:Saxifraga aizoides IMG 4148 puterublom longyearbyen.jpg
• 
• File:Saxifraga aizoides IMG 4122 gullrublom longyearbyen.jpg
• File:Saxifraga aizoides IMG 4116 gullrublom longyearbyen.jpg

It might be best to move these to Category:Unidentified Brassicaceae and correct the descriptions accordingly. Best regards --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 23:59, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

These are another two plant photographs with a wrong ID:

These cannot be Rhodiola rosea, because they have got 5 petals per flower instead of 4 for Rhodiola rosea. This might be Phedimus kamtschaticus or a related similar species. --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 11:41, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, they are Phedimus hybridus. Bjoertvedt (talk) 03:05, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Tools/Commonist

I don't know if you have seen , but this tools enables fast upload of huge number of images.Quahadi Añtó 17:17, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I am aware of Commonist. Bjoertvedt (talk) 18:40, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 08:53, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year[reply]

Hei Erlend! Kan du ta en titt på to bilder du lastet opp til WLM? Det gjelder http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ringebu_IMG_3048.JPG og http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ringebu_IMG_3049.JPG Bildene heter Ringebu og under står det: Nybyen vannforsyningsanlegg, Nybyen, Longyearbyen, Svalbard. Om man klikker på bildet for å få det i større format kan man se at det står Kaupanger på skiltet og Landsbyen Ringebu på flaggene, så det er sikkert i Ringebu. Vet du hvilken bygning det er? Mvh.--Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 10:13, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Uff, her har det blitt litt "klipp og lim". Har retta opp teksten nå. Men det rare er at dette er den største, mest staselige bygningen i hele Ringebu - men det framgår ikke på bygningen hva den har vært brukt til. Den står liksom bare der... Bjoertvedt (talk) 19:00, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hei! Hver kommune har egen kategori, bilder fra Oslo skal derfor i kategorien Cultural heritage monuments in Oslo og ikke Cultural heritage monuments in Norway. ;-) Så mange fine bilder det har kommet allerede! Gøy! Ha en fin søndag! Mvh.--Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 13:21, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Uff ja, det glemmer jeg visst for hver gang.... Fin solrik søndag - og takk for tipset... ;-) Bjoertvedt (talk) 13:24, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hei. Ser du har satt inn Cultural heritage monuments in Oslo igjen på filer jeg har fjernet det og hvor det er føyet til i kategorien. Vær så snill å ikke gjør det; jeg har fjernet hundrevis på bildene dine de siste dagene. Altså; når f.eks. Ørakerbråten har egen kategori skal Cultural heritage monuments in Oslo bare stå på kategorien og ikke under hvert enkelt bilde. Mvh.--Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 21:05, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Aha - skjønner! Da skal jeg fjerne dem, og passé på. Takk for all god hjelp! Bjoertvedt (talk) 22:24, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hei! Takk for hyggelig fotosafari i dag! Du, filen mangler her: File:Gr%C3%B6nland_Nordbygt_48_rk_164503_IMG_8331.JPG Du kan enten laste den opp på nytt eller jeg kan be om hurtigsletting. Mvh.--Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 20:42, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tusen takk - jeg fikk beskjed om at den var lastet opp fra før av, da tror jeg det er Commons som bug'er og ser på selve opplastingen som en "tidligere"... Skal ta den opp igjen! Gleder meg til å se fangsten av helleristninger!! ;.-) Bjoertvedt (talk) 20:49, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ikke mulig å laste den opp. Får beskjed om at den fins, men det gjør den vel ikke... ;.) Bjoertvedt (talk) 20:51, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jeg ser du har kategorisert dine bilder fra Oslo bispegård/Oslo gamle bispegård i Category:Bispegaarden. Denne kategorier gjelder bispegården i Kalundborg. Jeg går ut i fra at noen av bildene hører hjemme i Category:Oslo Ladegård, men jeg er usikker på om det gjelder alle (det er flere katalognumre i Riksantikvarens kulturminnebase ute og går her). Kan du ta en titt på det? - mvh 4ing (talk) 08:01, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Da trenger vi ny kategori. Oslo Ladegård er et annet bygg på et annet sted. Bjoertvedt (talk) 19:56, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Anne Sophie har ordnet opp, se Category:Bispegården, Oslo :-) 4ing (talk) 20:31, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Anne Sophie er en helt!  ;-) Bjoertvedt (talk) 20:41, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bjoertvedt. Could you please clean up your uploads as I did here? --Leyo 16:35, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry but I do not understand your question. I have used the Wizard and any lack of such vital tags is quite surprising to me. How many files is this applying to, I do not know, When you say "clean up your uploads", there is a difficulty when I have well above 12.000 "uploads". Though I have never seen on any of them that such important data like "source" and "author" are missing. Could you explain how this might have come about? 84.208.189.220 17:11, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You successfully fixed one. In the above category, there are more. Their file name starts with “Dovre” or “Hjerkinn”. --Leyo 21:58, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm. That one only had the same tag twice. I went through 10-15 files and none had any tags missing, and all had the source and author tags. Would be better if you could point to some of them , it is hard to look for the needle in the hay stack... ;-) Bjoertvedt (talk) 22:52, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just search for the keywords “Dovre” and “Hjerkinn” in the category mentioned above. --Leyo 10:20, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ català ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ română ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ українська ∙ +/− Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey. Dear Bjoertvedt, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

العربية | català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | magyar | Nederlands | polski | svenska | ไทย | +/− Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey! Dear Bjoertvedt, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strömstad Massleberg Skee 614-1 IMG 8921 ID 10159506140001.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:01, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Munkedal Kviström 1-14 tingshuset ID 21400000697019 IMG 0296.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Blue channel satured --The Photographer 14:16, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply] OK to me. Mattbuck 22:45, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tanum Bottna 136 ID 10160401360001 IMG 8823.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tanum 405 kalleby-laangemyr musicians IMG 8893 ID 10160604050001.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

You have uploaded this image from Tower, Minnesota. It sure does look like the John and Helen Stefanich family home to me--though I have not seen it in years and could well be wrong. Do you have any connection to the photo? Thanks.

216.21.205.118 14:57, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi and thanks for your question. I don't know the owners, just wanted to shoot this photo as a representative of the typical building style and livelihood of these small towns of MN. It is a nice house and a typical Tower home! BR, Bjoertvedt (talk) 15:45, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hej Erlend

Ditt foto C J Carlsons handelshus uppladdat till årets Wiki Loves Monuments i Sverige saknar id-nummer från Riksantikvarieämbetets bebyggelseregister - BeBR.

Jag kan inte hitta C J Carlsons handelshus i bebyggelseregistret - har du något ID-nummer? För att fotot skall kunna delta i tävlingen krävs då det gäller byggnadsminnen att det avbildade objektet finns i Riksantikvarieämbetets bebyggelseregister.

Med vänlig hälsning

Stefan Elfving (WMSE) (talk) 12:10, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Sverige

Neeeej, det har det inte. I Norge gör vi så där att man kan lasta upp också dom inte-registrerade kulturminnerna under WLM, men dom deltar inte i juryns bedömning. På det sättet får man inn också bilder af kulturminnen som för tilfellet inte står i Riksantikvariens databas, men som fortfarande kan betecknas som ett kulturminne. Men dom bilderna kan altså inte premieras. Hur ni gör det i Sverige bedömmar ni själve, och jag vill fölge dom reglarna ni har.

Bästa hälsningar

Bjoertvedt (talk) 12:30, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I enlighet med våra regler har jag då tagit bort fotot som deltagare i den svenska deltävlingen i WLM. Hälsningar Stefan Elfving (WMSE) (talk) 11:29, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Bjoertvedt,

vor zehn Tagen endete der vierte Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments. Du hast daran aktiv teilgenommen und wir möchten Dir dafür herzlich danken.

Mit mehr als 35 Tausend Fotos hat Deutschland wie in den Vorjahren ein gutes Ergebnis erreicht und einen Anteil von 14 % an diesem internationalen Projekt erbracht, an dem sich 40 Länder beteiligten. Sehr erfreulich ist die hohe Zahl an 651 Teilnehmern allein in Deutschland. Schon zum Abschluss des Wettbewerbs waren rund 6000 Fotos (=17 %) in Listen und Artikel eingebunden. Einen detaillierten Überblick zu den Fotos, den Bundesländern und Teilnehmern findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite.

Die deutsche Jury hat nun die eingereichten Beiträge übernommen und ist gegenwärtig dabei, diesen wertvollen Fotobestand zu den Kulturdenkmalen zu sichten. Am nächsten Wochenende wird in Hamburg die entscheidende Jury-Sitzung stattfinden. Wir wünschen auch Dir mit Deinem Foto-Beitrag dabei viel Glück und Erfolg. Du darfst gespannt sein und all Deine Freunde bitten, Dir die Daumen zu drücken.

Die preisgekrönten 100 Gewinner-Fotos werden in der Woche ab dem 20. Oktober veröffentlicht. Auf dieser Grundlage wird auch in diesem Jahr ein Kalender-Poster für 2015 gedruckt werden.

Auf zwei Möglichkeiten einer weiteren aktiven Mitwirkung an unserem Denkmal-Projekt möchten wir bei dieser Gelegenheit hinweisen bzw. Dich dazu einladen:

• Unsere Freunde in Österreich haben mit einem gerade gestarteten Denkmal-Cup das Editieren von Denkmallisten und Denkmalartikeln in den Focus gerückt. Bis Ende des Jahres kannst Du Punkte sammeln und Preise gewinnen. Dabei geht es mit diesem Wettbewerb nicht nur um Kulturdenkmale in AT oder D, sondern generell um Denkmale in der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia, als offen für alle Länder.

• Vom 6.-8. November findet erneut die Europäische Denkmalmesse in Leipzig statt. Mit Unterstützung von Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. werden wir zum zweiten Mal die Ergebnisse von Wiki Loves Monuments im Rahmen eines Standes sowie eines Workshops vorstellen.

WLM-Aktivisten sind herzlich eingeladen, bei der Betreuung des Messestandes sowie in den Gesprächen über Möglichkeiten einer partnerschaftlichen Zusammenarbeit mit den Denkmalbehörden mitzuwirken. Die Reisekosten übernimmt für 8-10 registrierte Standbetreuer WMDE. Es muss nicht der gesamte Messezeitraum sein, auch eine Mitwirkung an 2 Tagen hilft uns, den Beitrag der Wikipedia für die Denkmaltopographie sichtbar zu machen.

Und schließlich gilt: Nach dem Wettbewerb ist vor dem Wettbewerb. Bereits jetzt kann jeder mit der Planung von Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 beginnen. Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß dabei wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross), 11.10.2014

Hei Erlend! Kan du ta en titt på disse tre bildene og evt. endre beskrivelsen. De ligger i kategorien Ringebu, men i beskrivelsen står det: Nybyen vannforsyningsanlegg, Nybyen, Longyearbyen, Svalbard.

Takk for sist, forresten! Mvh.--Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 13:20, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed!. Og fortsatt strålende god jul! Bjoertvedt (talk) 01:20, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Bjoertvedt,

hast du das Bild aus dem Flugzeug aufgenommen?--Kopiersperre (talk) 23:21, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes! BR, Bjoertvedt (talk) 03:38, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Takk for så mange bilder av Norge - hilsen Sjokolade (talk) 09:10, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Herzlichen Dank', Chokolade! Kommt mehr... Bjoertvedt (talk) 18:13, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Would be useful to have a coordinate for this picture, and some explanation as to what "hatta" means. JMK (talk) 11:40, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think that is said in the text - Dadna is a municipality, Hatta is a mountain ridge (and a city). Bjoertvedt (talk) 20:40, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Bjoertvedt,

nun ist es wieder soweit. Vom 1. bis zum 30. September findet zum fünften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Im Mittelpunkt steht bekanntlich das Fotografieren von Kulturdenkmalen. Du hast an einem der letzten Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen und wir freuen uns auf weitere Bildbeiträge von Dir.

Viele interessante Motive, nicht nur Burgen und Schlösser, sondern auch Fachwerkhäuser, Brücken und Brunnen, technische und Industriedenkmale und vieles mehr gibt es noch zu fotografieren, damit sie in der Wikipedia dokumentiert werden können. Nützliche Tipps findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite. Du kannst gerne individuell Fototouren durchführen oder aber Dich auch Gruppentouren anschließen. Besonders freuen wir uns auf Fotos, die Lücken in den Denkmallisten der Wikipedia ausfüllen.

Darüber hinaus kannst Du auch an der Arbeit der Jury teilnehmen, die Mitte Oktober die Fotos bewerten und die Gewinner ermitteln wird. Bis zum 15. August kannst du hier Deine Bewerbung einreichen.

Viel Erfolg und Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia in den bevorstehenden Wettbewerbswochen wünscht Dir das Orga-Team. Wir freuen uns auf Deine Fotos.

( Bernd Gross, 6. August 2015)

- Prima! Grüssen, Bjoertvedt (talk) 15:45, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, your photo File:Kiel IMG 3753 nikolaikirche.JPG is used here against the creative commons license terms. Attribution is done, but the YouTube license allows YouTube itself and its advertising partners to use material without restrictions or any conditions. This is against the share-alike condition, and possibily against your concerns, too. --87.155.92.46 12:22, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi and thanks for notifying me on this one! I have usually pursued such abuses from rich media channels and newspapers, while this seems to be some civil society force behind the YouTube snut (right?) which I would normally not pursue. However, they may risk sanctions from others, so they should clearly be told about the rules. If I read you correctly, I would then assume that virtually no Commons material can appear on YouTube, since they use other licenses than CCBY-compatible ones? BR, Bjoertvedt (talk) 20:02, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hej Bjoertved. Du har lagt fire fine billeder ind under Category:Carl Frederik Sørensen, og tak for det. Har du mulighed for at vælge et af dem som det blivende og så lægge de tre andre over i din egen userspace? For fire billeder af samme motiv er måske lige i overkanten. Venlig hilsen --Rsteen (talk) 18:15, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Er det en policy, eller har vi kun ondt om plads? Mvh, Bjoertvedt (talk) 20:45, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ingen beder dig om at slette noget. Måske kunne du bare vurdere, om alle fire fotos bidrager til oplevelsen af C.F.Sørensens billede. Hvis din holdning er, at det gør de, så fred med det, og undskyld ulejligheden. Venlig hilsen --Rsteen (talk) 06:34, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jeg ser at du har skrevet Vest-Telemark Teknologipark i filnavnene på File:Seljord aarhusmoen IMG 2685 Vest-Telemark Teknologipark.JPG og File:Seljord E134 aarhusmoen IMG 2686 Vest-Telemark Teknologipark.JPG. Det er riktig at Vest-Telemark Teknologipark skal bygges i området der, men det er på nabotomta utenfor venstre bildekant, på en stor åpen tomt inntil veien. Byggingen er ikke påbegynt ennå, og det er ikke ventet ferdig før tidligst 2018/2019, i forbindelse med åpningen av Mælefjelltunnelen. Men siden det er ment å rettes mot offshoreindustrien og vi nå tilsynelatende har en krise der, så blir jeg ikke overrasket om prosjektet drøyer litt. Bygget som er i bildene er den tidligere pallefabrikken til Brødrene Aarbakk AS som gikk konkurs i september 2010. Akkurat hva som var der da du tok bildene vet jeg ikke, men jeg tror det er flyttet inn noen andre treforedlingsbedrifter der. Uansett er kanskje Århus industriområde eller Århusmoen industriområde (jeg tror førstnevnte er det korrekte, mens Århusmoen er adressa) greit å ha i filnavnene. Bergenga (talk) 20:16, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Bjoertvedt!

Du erhältst diese Nachricht, weil du bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 teilgenommen hast.

Auch in diesem Jahr beteiligt sich Deutschland wieder am internationalen Fotowettbewerb rund um Bau- und Kulturdenkmale. Bisher wurden bereits mehr als 18.000 Bilder hochgeladen – und wir würden uns sehr über weitere Bilder von Dir freuen. Noch bis zum 30. September 2016 kannst Du Deine Bilder hochladen. Alles Wissenswerte erfährst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Außerdem möchten wir Dich einladen, ab 12. September 2016 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese sichtet und bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland.

Für Rückfragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite oder unter infowikilovesmonuments.de zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams
(DCB, 18:46, 8 September 2016 (UTC))[reply]

Ja ja, ich weiss! Aber letztes Jahr fuhr ich leider nicht ins Deutschland, so es gibt jetzt leider nichts zum Hochladen... Bjoertvedt (talk) 20:48, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you uploaded some pictures from a soccer game at Nadderud between Stabæk and Kolbotn, apparently on a date (June 12, 2013) when no game took place between these teams. Is the date wrong, or is this a non-official game (or a junior game)? Ketil3 (talk) 07:51, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

well, it was on the training field o it may have been a training match, or a cup outside of the premium one. It is too long to remember, unfortunately. Bjoertvedt (talk) 20:30, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fujeirah city 1501200713193.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Canopus Grandiflora 10:57, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fujeirah city 1501200713195.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Canopus Grandiflora 10:57, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Здравей, Bjoertvedt

получаваш това писмо, тъй като миналата година си участвал/а в изданията на „Уики обича Земята“ през 2015 или 2016 г. или „Уики обича паметниците“ 2015 или 2016. До края на този месец юни, те каним отново да участваш в тазгодишното фотосъстезание „Уики обича Земята 2017“.

Отново търсим твоите снимки от защитените природни обекти на България – национални и природни паркове, резервати, защитени местности и природни забележителности и отново това могат да са както пейзажи, така и снимани в близък план животни и растения. Специален акцент тази година поставяме на снимките на балканските и българските еднемични растителни видове. Отново няма ограничения за броя снимки, с които можеш да участваш в конкурса и можеш да използваш същата регистрация в Общомедия като миналогодишната. Не е нужно и снимките да са правени през този един месец – можеш да разгледаш архивите си и да споделиш снимки и от минали години и сезони. Единственото условие на конкурса е да отдадеш снимките си под свободен лиценз и без водни знаци и други надписи с декларации за авторството върху тях.

Авторите на първите 10 класирани снимки ще продължат в международния кръг на „Уики обича Земята“ и ще представят страната ни. Някои от партньорите ни в конкурса ще предоставят награди – книги по география и екология. Междувременно, ако качиш над 25, 50 и 100 снимки, ще получиш съответно виртуална бронзова, сребърна и златна УОЗ-значка  ;)

Но най-важното за „Уики обича Земята“ е, че с дарените от теб снимки енциклопедичното знание, достъпно на български език, се разраства и подобрява, тъй като използваме снимките за илюстриране на съществуващи и създаване на нови статии в Уикипедия! Затова не се колебай, а участвай! :)

УОЗдрави,

Екипът на „Уики обича Земята“! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:17, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

• File:Madinat Jumeirah 01.jpg

And also:

• File:Madinat Jumeirah 02.jpg

Yours sincerely, Themightyquill (talk) 07:27, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Skavlan IMG 2615.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Kigsz (talk) 10:20, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Copenhagen Christiania IMG 5604.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

2.109.102.1 10:42, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Jinghang Canal has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

MNXANL (talk) 01:49, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

• File:Dubai Internet City 01.jpg

Yours sincerely, Ras67 (talk) 20:59, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(NO) Kategoriene sier Nesodden og Oppegård. Det stemmer ikke. Utsnittet viser det innerste av Bunnefjorden, med veikryss/avkjørsel mot Nesodden, det er så, men bildeutsnittet viser Ås kommune i underkant, og Frogn kommune ovenfor/vestfor grenseelva. Om det blir endringer etter kommunereformen gjenstår å se. (EN) Categories are not precise, not Nesodden, not Oppegård, but Frogn and Ås. T.Schrøder (talk) 11:10, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Charlton Heston Gallery.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:52, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

• File:Monument de la Tranchee IMG 8190 verdun US FR tranchee.jpg

And also:

• File:Monument de la Tranchee IMG 8191 verdun US FR tranchee.jpg

Yours sincerely, Labattblueboy (talk) 10:06, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

RMaung (WMF) 01:12, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RMaung (WMF) 15:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hej,

Du får det här meddelandet då du tidigare bidragit med bilder till den svenska deltävlingen av Wiki Loves Monuments, och jag hoppas att du vill vara med i år också. Kategorierna är som vanligt byggnadsminnen, fornminnen, K-märkta fartyg och arbetslivsmuseer, och du är välkommen att bidra med bilder hela september. Om du varit ute i världen och rest kan du även se om resorna sammanfaller med övriga internationella deltävlingar, och i så fall vara med och tävla även där.

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 15:31, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RMaung (WMF) 20:01, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

• File:Dubai Marina 01.jpg

Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:02, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bjoertvedt - can you recheck the identity of File:Cacatua goffiniana - Palmas del Mar PR - Pterocarpus Forest IMG 2333.jpg and File:Cacatua goffiniana - Palmas del Mar PR - Pterocarpus Forest IMG 2335.jpg please? They do not match descriptions and images of Cacatua goffiniana, which has (a) a shorter, white crest, (b) a diffuse reddish spot on the lores which yours don't, and (c) a paler bill. My best guess is Cacatua moluccensis, but I'm not 100% sure on that - MPF (talk) 18:11, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 

العربية | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | English | español | فارسی | français | עברית | हिन्दी | italiano | magyar | македонски | 日本語 | Nederlands | português do Brasil | română | سنڌي | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | українська | +/−

---

Dear Bjoertvedt,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:33, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 

العربية | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | English | español | فارسی | français | עברית | हिन्दी | italiano | magyar | македонски | 日本語 | Nederlands | português do Brasil | română | سنڌي | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | українська | +/−

---

Dear Bjoertvedt,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:43, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Gulen map nature preserves.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Sourced to file since deleted as copyvio or missing Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 13:55, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tulipa sylvestris IMG 4886.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Nina Shenturk (talk) 23:06, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zhangzhou kiln 16th 17th C IMG 9369 cropped.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Red-back spider (talk) 21:39, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Huawei stand at GSMA Barcelona 20080214.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Larryasou (talk) 14:23, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Bjoertvedt I was wondering if the filename refers to Ontex (entreprise). Thank you for your time. :-) Lotje (talk) 09:22, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, absolutely. Ontex is located at exactly this spot in Karachi. Look here: https://ontex.com/company/around-the-world/bin-qasim/

Bjoertvedt (talk) 16:28, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hej!

(For information in English, see Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Sweden or other participating countries.)

Du får det här meddelandet då du tidigare har deltagit i de svenska deltävlingarna av Wiki Loves Monuments eller Wiki Loves Earth! För någon vecka sedan blev det klart vem som tog hem förstapriset i Wiki Loves Earth 2020 – stort grattis till Brydand100 och hans fotografi av Röttlefallet! Alla vinnare kan du se här – tack alla deltagare för fina bidrag!

Den 1 september inleds 2020 års svenska deltävling av Wiki Loves Monuments, där det skulle vara väldigt roligt om du ville vara med och delta! Målet med Wiki Loves Monuments är att fotografera svenska kulturarvsmonument. De kategorier som ingår är byggnadsminnen, fornminnen, K-märkta fartyg och arbetslivsmuseer – och du är välkommen att bidra med bilder hela september.

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Eric Luth (WMSE) (talk) 14:23, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:BeraneWeapon.png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

JuTa 07:26, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

• File:Femhundrelapper IMG 1755.JPG

And also:

• File:Femhundrelapper IMG 1757.JPG
• File:Femhundrelapper IMG 1758.JPG
• File:Femhundrelapper IMG 1759.JPG
• File:Femhundrelapper IMG 1760.JPG
• File:Femhundrelapper IMG 1761.JPG
• File:Femhundrelapper IMG 1762.JPG
• File:Femhundrelapper IMG 1763.JPG
• File:Femhundrelapper IMG 1764.JPG
• File:Femhundrelapper IMG 1765.JPG
• File:Femhundrelapper IMG 1766.JPG
• File:Femhundrelapper IMG 1769.JPG
• File:Femhundrelapper IMG 1770.JPG
• File:Femhundrelapper IMG 1771.JPG

Yours sincerely, 廣九直通車 (talk) 06:48, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

• File:Sarajevo City Center from ohr hq IMG 1219.JPG

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 02:40, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

• File:Verdun rue mazel IMG 5914 monument of victory and children of verdun.jpg

And also:

• File:Verdun rue mazel IMG 5915 monument of victory and children of verdun.jpg

Yours sincerely, Labattblueboy (talk) 21:14, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

• File:Dubai UAE Jumeirah Mosque 1301200712683.jpg

And also:

• File:Dubai UAE Jumeirah Mosque 1301200712687.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:51, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

• File:NY 303 W 42nd Street Duane Reade IMG 2068.JPG

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:50, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hej!

(For information in English, see Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Sweden or other participating countries.)

Du får det här meddelandet då du tidigare har deltagit i de svenska deltävlingarna av Wiki Loves Monuments eller Wiki Loves Earth! För någon vecka sedan blev det klart vem som tog hem förstapriset i Wiki Loves Earth 2021 – stort grattis till Måns Hagberg och hans fotografi av reveln vid Vivesholms naturreservat! Alla vinnare kan du se här – tack alla deltagare för fina bidrag!

Den 1 september inleds 2021 års svenska deltävling av Wiki Loves Monuments, där det skulle vara väldigt roligt om du ville vara med och delta! Målet med Wiki Loves Monuments är att fotografera svenska kulturarvsmonument. De kategorier som ingår är byggnadsminnen, fornminnen, K-märkta fartyg och arbetslivsmuseer – och du är välkommen att bidra med bilder hela september.

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 12:53, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

• File:Reichstag Berlin rooftop IMG 7819.jpg

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:22, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Attius Macro is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: CSD C2 (unuseful empty category) If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Palosirkka (talk) 13:05, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hej,
(For information in English, see Wiki Loves Earth 2022 in Sweden or other participating countries.)

Du får det här meddelandet eftersom du tidigare har bidragit med bilder till de svenska deltävlingarna av Wiki Loves Earth eller Wiki Loves Monuments. Jag hoppas att du vill vara med i år också! Som vanligt ingår naturreservat och nationalparker, biosfärområden och naturminnen i tävlingen! Tävlingen började 1 maj, och pågår under hela maj månad. Om du har varit ute i världen och rest kan du även se om resorna sammanfaller med övriga internationella deltävlingar, och i så fall vara med och tävla även där. Även om fortsatt försiktighet är att rekommendera går det bra att ge sig ut på fotosafari och fotografera naturen i ditt närområde – eller varför inte damma av fotoalbumen och tävla med bilder du har tagit tidigare?

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 13:41, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Kollege, ich habe mir erlaubt die Beschreibung Ihrer Aufnahme File:Sjöllingstad IMG 3220 spinnery combed wool.JPG zu korrigieren. Falls die Leute im Museum den Titel und die Beschreibung so bestimmt haben, war es ein Irrtum. Für gekämmte Wolle (combed wool) werden andere Ringspinnmaschinen gebraucht. Grüße vom ehemaligen Textiler.--Ryj (talk) 10:16, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hej!

(For information in English, see Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 in Sweden or other participating countries.)

Du får det här meddelandet då du tidigare har deltagit i de svenska deltävlingarna av Wiki Loves Monuments eller Wiki Loves Earth!

Den 1 september inleds 2022 års svenska deltävling av Wiki Loves Monuments, där det skulle vara väldigt roligt om du ville vara med och delta! Målet med Wiki Loves Monuments är att fotografera svenska kulturarvsmonument. De kategorier som ingår är byggnadsminnen, fornminnen, kulturmärkta fartyg och fritidsbåtar och arbetslivsmuseer – och du är välkommen att bidra med bilder hela september.

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 10:26, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I see that you have participated in the Norwegian part of Wiki Loves Monuments in previous years. Thank you very much! I'd like to inform you that the 2022 edition of the contest has just started, and I want to encourage you to participate this year as well!

Photos are not required to have been taken this year – they can be from any time, as long as they are uploaded during October 2022. Maybe you have some more pictures from previous years that can be uploaded for this year's contest?

You can read more about it on the contest page. Thanks, and good luck! Jon Harald Søby (WMNO) (talk) 17:56, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Turist Montenegro.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 07:57, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Podgorica EU OSCE UNDP embassies 1a Bulevar Svetog Petra Cetinjskog.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−