User talk:BKP

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, BKP!

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 18:27, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Hej BKP, Du har lagt Verzasca-dæmningen.JPG op på Commons. Jeg undrer mig dog over, at du har dateret den til 1. januar 1980, når den reklamerer for det verdensberømte bungy jump fra filmen GoldenEye - en film, hvor optagelserne først startede 15 år senere... Kan du ikke prøve at checke datoen? MVH heb [T C E] 07:25, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hej Heb.
Hvilken befrielse pludselig at blive kontaktet på sit modersmål, det er ikke så ofte her i "Wikimedia Commons-Verdenen". Kan du ikke prøve at forklare mig (der ikke er specielt overbegavet), hvorledes jeg sætter en Kategori på når jeg oplader billeder via den ellers udmærkede "Vejviser", - på forhånd tak!
Og så til din skarpe iagttagelse omkring mit billede af Verzasca-dæmningen. Jeg aner ikke, hvad der er sket. Billedet er taget den 29. juni 2009, men hvorfor den laver om på datoen må guderne vide. Men hvis du scroller helt ned på omtalte fil kan du under Metadata se, at samme (forkerte) dato ligger der. Det kan tyde på, at fejlen er opstået på et tidligere tidspunkt - måske i kameraet - men at jeg ikke har været opmærksom på den før.
Men godt set af dig, - tak! mvh BKP (talk) 09:50, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hej BKP,
Vi er faktisk en håndfuld der snakker dansk her på Commons, men ellers har du ret - det er et engelsk-tungt sted. Og det bærer hele kategoriseringen af billederne også præg af. I udgangspunktet burde størstedelen af de menuer o.l. du ser på Commons dog være på dansk. Hvis den ikke er, så vælg preferences i menuen øverst til højre, gå ned til sektionen 'Internationalisation' og vælg da - dansk og tryk på Save i bunden:
Med hensyn til kategorierne kan det være en smule bøvlet, da det kræver man kender navnet på kategorien. Men under upload vil du komme til en side, hvor du kan vælge Tilføj kategorier eller yderligere oplysninger.... Her skal du trykke på den lille pil til venstre; så vil den pege nedaf og ikke mod højre og du vil få flere felter frem:
For hver gang du vil tilføje en kategori mere, trykker du blot på Tilføj under den sidste kategori-boks, så kommer der en boks mere frem og der bliver plads til endnu en kategori.
Alternativt kan du bruge fane-bladet find categories i toppen, så kommer du til en webside der kan hjælpe dig med det, men igen er den på engelsk. Jeg vil anbefale dig at surfe lidt rundt på Commons og finde billeder der ligner de billeder du vil kategorisere, og så blot indsætte de samme kategorier. Med venlig hilsen, heb [T C E] 08:58, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hej igen Heb,
Tak for en fin instruktion, - med de evner burde du være i søværnet, her kan vi altid bruge dygtige folk!!
Jeg var efterhånden af egen drift nået frem til stort set de samme værktøjer mht at kategorisere, hvilket jeg stadig finder umanerligt bøvlet og akavet. Jeg savner en alfabetisk listning af kategorierne med en ordentlig søgefunktion a la den der er i Wikipedia. Men bevares; det kan da la' sig gøre endda.
Nok en gang tak for hjælpen. Hej og god sommer. Mvh BKP (talk) 08:44, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nå, nu har jeg fundet det jeg søgte, nemlig den alfabetiske listning af kategorierne med mulighed for at søge - jeg er glad igen!! mvh BKP (talk) 09:58, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
File:Old England i Bruxelles.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Marmot 48 (talk) 17:53, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

En lille opfordring vedr. navngivning af filer

[edit]

Hej BKP, Først vil jeg gerne give den en tommelfinger op ad for at lægge alle de mange fine billeder op på Commons; det er super godt og du er blevet ret god til det med kategorierne også :) Jeg har dog bemærket, at en del af dine filer har et navn der starter med hvad der umiddelbart ligner en dato. Det er fint at have datoen med, men da det kun er de første 20 tegn i fil-navnet der bliver vist i gallerierne, vil det oftest være mere praktisk at have datoen til sidst, så jeg vil gerne opfordre dig til at placere datoen der fremover. Det er dog ikke nogen "kriminel" handling at have datoen først (du kan se Commons fil-navngivnings politik på engelsk her), men det anbefales at bruge de første 20 tegn på noget vigtigt. Med venlig hilsen, Henrik/heb [T C E] 09:17, 27 September 2012 (UTC) P.S. så bærer jeg faktisk stadigvæk Søværnets uniform, selv om jeg i disse tider slår mine tøjler i FKIT. Jeg vender dog helt sikkert tilbage til Søværnet på et tidspunkt :) MVH heb [T C E] 09:18, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jeg skal se, om jeg kan lægge min (u)vane fra mig mht at datere filerne, det er ikke min egen ide, jeg har set andre gøre tilsvarende og syntes faktisk det var rart at kunne se dateringen fra start. Men jeg kan sagtens følge dine argumenter, og vil ha' det i baghovedet fremtidigt.
P.S. Jeg bærer ikke længere min uniform, idet jeg nåede pensionsalderen for snart et år siden. Det kan anbefales, selv om indtjeningen falder lidt ved samme lejlighed. Mange hilsner Bjarne/BKP (talk) 10:55, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hej Bjarne, Endnu en lille opfordring: Når nu du lægger filer op lige p.t. så bruger du Læg en fil op-linket fra den danske Wikipedia. Det har den konsekvens, at filen bliver anbragt i kategorien Uploaded from da-wiki, med henblik på en kontrol af en dansk-talende administrator på Commons (dette var et krav, da vi implementerede funktionen, der gør at filer ryger direkte på Commons). Men eftersom du jo udviser eksemplarisk adfærd, når du lægger filer op, er det strengt taget ikke nødvendigt, at vi kontrollerer alle dine uploads - f.eks. har jeg lige kontrolleret 159 af dine fil-uploads og det er jo alle eksempler på uploads for engelebørn :) Jeg vil derfor gerne opfordre dig til at bruge Læg en fil op-linket på Commons i stedet (der er stort set ingen forskel på dem, set fra din side), så vi ikke skal kontrollere alle dine fine billeder :) Med venlig hilsen, Henrik/heb [T C E] 08:46, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hej Henrik. Jeg har et par gange brugt linket på Commons, men har ikke været opmærksom på differencen. Men jeg skal gerne bruge dette link fremtidigt. I øvrigt vil jeg gerne rose den, som har "fundet på" denne guidede tur gennem uploadningens trange stier, for det gør det dejligt nemt for os almindeligt dødelige at bruge systemet. Venlig hilsen Bjarne/BKP (talk) 09:10, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Davos Jakobshorn-bahn 11.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

INeverCry 20:56, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hej. That's OK, You may delete it at once, - I did not know this was a problem. BKP (talk) 21:04, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
File:Sherlocks.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

LGA talkedits 10:35, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:A cup of coffee.JPG. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  ไทย  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Danish cinema ad for Frankie & Johnny.jpg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Danish cinema ad for Frankie & Johnny.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Danish cinema ad for Frankie & Johnny.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Residhome Apparthotel.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:09, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Chassipress (talk) 20:32, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Graceland Randers 05.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan2 (talk) 19:12, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:54, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.
You can delete it if you want to, I don't care.
Yours BKP (talk) 09:54, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]