User talk:Anarkangel
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
Image deletion warning | Image:Maiden_wordmark.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT (talk) 05:36, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Ajakim.jpg is uncategorized since 25 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:36, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
File:Sidvicious.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Night Ranger (talk) 07:22, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, Image:Ajakim.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
--Tabercil (talk) 13:14, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
File:Eminem01.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Martin H. (talk) 19:19, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
Kit body Lottoblue.png
[edit]Bonjour, j'ai vu que tu avais réalisé quelques gabarits pour les couleurs des équipes sportives(exemple:). J'essaie d'en réaliser pour des équipes de CFA, mais lorsque je les utilise, cela ne se cale pas correctement. Peut me dire s'il y a un gabarit, car, même en passant pas les modèles SVG, ça ne tombe pas bien. Je rame pour trouver la solution. Merci. Cdl Spax89 (talk) 10:25, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Leonardo_Cuellar.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Martin H. (talk) 00:01, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
File:Eddie inspiration.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Trycatch (talk) 12:18, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
File:Resenbrink.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Ytoyoda (talk) 08:54, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
File:Anarkangel-CDs.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
– Adrignola talk 00:23, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
File:Ozzy wordmark.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
IllaZilla (talk) 13:18, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
File:Ozzy wordmark.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
-Nard (Hablemonos)(Let's talk) 13:30, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
Marilyn Manson
[edit]Hola Anarkangel, mi nombre es Alexis, soy de Mar del Plata y actualmente estoy trabjando en el articulo de Marilyn Manson (banda). Ayer buscando ejemplos de diferentes articulos destacados para mejorar la gramatica y demas, me fije que vectorizaste el logo de Slayer y lo pusiste en su articulo. Al parecer tienes experiencia con Inkscape y me gustaria pedirte, si no es mucha molestia, que vectorizes el logo de Manson (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:ASSMM.jpg) así queda de la misma fomra que el de Slayer, sin el cuadro blanco rodeadolo. Me vendria muy bien tu ayuda, ya que yo no tengo mucha idea de como se hacen este tipo de imagenes, también en lo posible, lo mejor para poder utilizarlo en la introdicción, seria que las palabras quedaran ubicadas de esta forma: http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-sblMlXQDs58/T0Xhocq_ckI/AAAAAAAAEhw/90AYlXUjrw0/s1600/405916_10150699787395815_93211205814_11350115_1205251990_n.jpg. Desda ya muchos saludos--Fallengrademan (talk) 19:42, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Lomas Athletic
[edit]Hola, me presento: me llamo Fernando y soy un gran aficionado a estadísticas y fotos del fútbol y rugby antiguo. Vi que subiste algunas fotos del Lomas A.C. (del libro de los 115 años), y quería saber si tenes algunas fotos de equipos viejos de ese club (de rugby), específicamente de los equipos de ganaron los títulos de 1899 y 1913. No sé si el libro tiene fotos de esa época, yo estuve viendo en otro libro conmemorativo y recién hay imágenes de rugby desde los años 60, por lo que se me hace muy difícil conseguir ese material. Si tuvieras alguna foto del S. XIX o década 1900-20, para mí sería extraordinario que las subas, a título personal, y también para aportar material al artículo de Lomas que estuve editando en la Wiki. Cualquier consulta o comentario, hacelo nomás. Saludos! - Fma12 (talk) 20:53, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 07:35, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 07:39, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Pinkfloyd.png
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Pinkfloyd.png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 06:49, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
File:Winlogo own work.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Leonel Sohns 18:24, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Lettera SP.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |