User talk:A. Öztas
|
|
exif categories
[edit]Hi,
Kannst du bitte in Zukunft darauf verzichten, EXIF bzw. ISO Kategorien zu meinen Bildern hinzufügen so wie hier? Ich brauche die nicht, die liefern keinen Mehrwert und beeinträchtigen nur die Übersichtlichkeit. Danke dir. --A.Savin 07:06, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hallo, danke für die Info. Ich werde das berücksichtigen. --Аныл Эзташ (talk) 10:41, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Es geht nicht nur um den Uploader. Du hast einen guten Punkt und deswegen sind diese Kategorien versteckt. Prototyperspective (talk) 09:39, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for replying to my review. Rather than withdrawing, you could upload a new version, if you can do so in the next ~week. Or nominate it again after corrections, ping me, and I'll happily re-review. It's looking good, except for those lens flares (could be removed using a dust spot removal tool), and the perspective. Understood about the building on the left not being straight, but you could use the railings on that side, and there's plenty of verticals on the right. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 07:17, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for you message! I will have another look at the photo tomorrow and try to correct the perspective properly. I also saw your comment on COM:QIC. --Аныл Эзташ (talk) 21:44, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Mike Peel: I've now taken another look at the photo and corrected the perspective. Some of the lines were really crooked, I don't know how I missed them, but sometimes you can't see the wood for the trees... I'll put it back into QIC tomorrow and see what I come up with. Best regards and thanks again for the tip. --Аныл Эзташ (talk) 20:32, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion - 09.10.2024
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Neuss (DE), Am Marianum -- 2014 -- 2534.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Berlin (DE), Marie-Elisabeth-Lüders-Haus und Fernsehturm -- 2019 -- 9319.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Hallo Herr Öztas, schön dass Sie sich der Dateien in Category:Media with GPS EXIF angenommen haben. Aber warum haben Sie die Ortsdaten ausgerechnet so eingetragen, dass die korrekte Darstellung der Beschreibungsseite zerstört wird? Wenn Sie das nicht ändern können, sollten Sie von der Bearbeitung meiner Bilder absehen, Danke. --Manfred Schröter, Berga (talk) 00:04, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hallo Herr Schröter, vielen Dank für diesen wichtigen Hinweis! Es scheint, dass da irgendetwas verrutscht ist. Die Bearbeitungen erfolgen normalerweise ausschließlich e:Bell_Tower_Thanjavur_ttkcvrvb122k23iph_(9).jpg&diff=prev&oldid=935632759 auf diese Weise und führen zu exakt +19 Bytes Veränderung. Ich überprüfe nochmal alle Geo-Aktualisierungen, die hiervon abweichen. --Аныл Эзташ (talk) 00:17, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- Update: Ich weiß noch nicht, woran es gelegen hat, aber betroffen waren 65–70 Bearbeitungen (von fast 6.000), die auf die gleichen 8 Benutzer fallen. Da wurde irgendetwas anscheinend anders gesetzt als üblich, wodurch es bei der Ergänzung der Geo-Koordinaten zu diesem Fehler kam. --Аныл Эзташ (talk) 01:34, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- Danke für die promte Reaktion. Da Ihre vielen Bearbeitungen ja (halb)-automatisch sein müssen, bekommt man Fehler nun nicht unbedingt sofort mit. Deswegen ja auch mein Hinweis zur Klärung der Ursache. Ich bin immer wieder angenehm überrascht, welche hochprofessionell arbeitenden Menschen man hier trifft. Evt. könnten Sie hier noch einen kleinen „Ursachenbericht“ geben, Danke --Manfred Schröter, Berga (talk) 11:06, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- Für das Auslesen von Koordinaten aus den Metadaten und Umwandeln sowie Platzieren in der Template:Location habe ich ein kleines Skript geschrieben, das ich als eines von vielen unter dem Projektnamen Bienchen laufen lasse. Ursprünglich nur für meine eigenen Fotos gedacht, habe ich es mit Blick auf die Category:Media with GPS EXIF etwas umgeschrieben und auch dort eingesetzt. Das Skript Geo.py (bzw. in diesem Fall konkreter Geo-fremdkategorie.py) lasse ich nebenbei laufen und prüfe stichprobenartig sowohl die letzten Änderungen als auch die print-Ausgaben im Terminal. In diesem Fall scheinen die Fehler durch eine spezifische Verschachtelung innerhalb des Template:Information entstanden zu sein, wenn weitere Vorlagen darin eingebunden waren (etwa Template:LangSwitch oder Template:de). Diese Situation konnte Bienchen leider nicht korrekt erkennen und verarbeiten, weshalb einige Bearbeitungen fehlerhaft wurden, statt dass die Datei übersprungen und dies entsprechend dokumentiert wurde. Da verhältnismäßig wenige Dateien betroffen waren, ist dieser Fehler leider durchgerutscht, zumal auch im Terminal keine Ausgabe erfolgt ist, die mich darauf aufmerksam gemacht hätte. Eine kleine Fehlerdokumentation habe ich auf der Diskussionsseite von Bienchen angelegt. --Аныл Эзташ (talk) 13:01, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- Danke für die promte Reaktion. Da Ihre vielen Bearbeitungen ja (halb)-automatisch sein müssen, bekommt man Fehler nun nicht unbedingt sofort mit. Deswegen ja auch mein Hinweis zur Klärung der Ursache. Ich bin immer wieder angenehm überrascht, welche hochprofessionell arbeitenden Menschen man hier trifft. Evt. könnten Sie hier noch einen kleinen „Ursachenbericht“ geben, Danke --Manfred Schröter, Berga (talk) 11:06, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion - 10.10.2024
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Istanbul (TR), Kınalıada, Küste -- 2024 -- 0478.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
,_Hafen_--_2023_--_0120.jpg){kind=link}
,_Hafen_--_2023_--_0120.jpg){kind=link}
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Istanbul (TR), Kınalıada, Hafen -- 2024 -- 0466.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Istanbul (TR), Kınalıada, Hafen -- 2024 -- 0459.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Istanbul (TR), Burgazada, Moschee -- 2024 -- 0755.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Istanbul (TR), Burgazada, Barbaros Hayrettin Caddesi -- 2024 -- 0683.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Istanbul (TR), Burgazada, Blick auf Heybeliada -- 2024 -- 0623.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Istanbul (TR), Burgazada, Feuerwehr -- 2024 -- 0573.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion - 11.10.2024
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bottrop (DE), Halde Haniel, Amphitheater -- 2023 -- 0069.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion - 12.10.2024
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Neuss (DE), Am Marianum -- 2014 -- 2529.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion - 14.10.2024
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Larus michahellis, Istanbul (TR) -- 2024 -- 0392.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Larus michahellis, Istanbul (TR) -- 2024 -- 0313.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Istanbul (TR), Burgazada, Kirche "Aya Yani" -- 2024 -- 0799.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion - 15.10.2024
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Istanbul (TR), Bostancı -- 2024 -- 0006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion - 16.10.2024
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Schönau am Königssee (DE), Königssee vom Jenner -- 2024 -- 0398.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ramsau bei Berchtesgaden (DE), Pfarrkirche St. Sebastian -- 2024 -- 0825.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Raspberry Pi Zero 2 W -- 2024 -- 0012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Raspberry Pi Zero 2 W -- 2024 -- 0008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!
[edit]
Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.
Round 2 will end at UTC.
If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 16 October 2024 (UTC)