Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Klosterkirche hirschhorn fenster.jpg

•  Info created by JuliusR - uploaded by JuliusR - nominated by JuliusR --JuliusR 23:07, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --JuliusR 23:07, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose  Neutral perspective can be corrected. Lycaon 11:40, 22 October 2007 (UTC) It is pretty, but it is tilted. Lycaon 23:46, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose I like it but I'm afraid it's tilted, not very sharp, and has too much black around the edge. --MichaelMaggs 05:45, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment This is really nice. Fix the tilt and I'll support. --JaGa 06:30, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support I'm convinced it isn't easily "fixed" like I assumed and am happy to support. --JaGa 03:49, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment Okay, tell me which tilt exactly you meen - to help me. I fixed a much stronger tilt and now all results of further correction seem to make it worse to me. I spent a lot of time to correct the top but it seams as if the top wasn't symmetric at all. Give me some hint to correct that --JuliusR 08:34, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Neutral I ivestigated it and I think you can't fix it. Because it not tilt, everything on the horizontal lines - the problem is perspectivic. You didn't shoting perfectly in front of window. Otherwise it's a good picture. --Beyond silence 10:14, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment I've tried to play around in Photoshop a bit, with this result, but i'm not sure if it's actually been improved so i'm not putting it up for voting. --Aqwis 10:44, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support If the slight tilt can be fixed, I'd prefer that, but it's still a really good example of a stained glass window. -- Ram-Man 14:11, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support I honestly can't see the tilt, and the details of the window are really good, I think it's more than enough for FP. --Nattfodd 15:03, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support I suppose the tilt is corrected, as I don't see any tilt. This is just an excellent picture of a stained-glass window, which is very difficult to photograph in a correct way. -- MJJR 20:04, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did you take a photo on them? It's not really hard, only need set the expose to dark to make the window not overexposed. --Beyond silence 07:49, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

•  Info Ok, thanks for all the assistance. I think you are right, it is the perspectivity. I couldn't stand in the needed height. But I liked the clear colors and tried my best. To tell the truth I like my version with the broader black frame better. Perhaps I'll get a second chance to take a better one. --JuliusR 20:15, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think not the height is the problem. May you stand a bit right from the window. --Beyond silence 07:47, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support Great image and colours SRauz 21:35, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support tilt, schmilt. It invokes a reaction from the viewer --Pumpmeup 03:39, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Thumbnail doesn't do it justice, I didn't think I would support until opening it at full res ! Benh 10:25, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Winiar^✉ 16:26, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Very good image… Photographic technique is good enough to the point where it can convey the beauty of the subject itself, which is, after all, the important thing. The real object of critique here, for me, is not whether the image is a pixel off or tilted a degree or so, too much dark around, etc., but the object itself, its value, and the recognition of the people who created it, not necessarily the skill of the photographer, which in this case is good enough. The photograph in this instance, is just a medium, a window between the viewer and the landscape. Any experienced photographer knows that the best conditions for a great picture are almost never there, so one must shoot to get the best possible under existing conditions. Shooting inside churches is shooting in a down to up direction most of the time, and convengence or tilt down is almost always there. Congratulations!--Tomascastelazo 16:48, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support - Tomascastelazo dixit - Alvesgaspar 16:50, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support per Tomascastelazo --Aqwis 12:44, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support without a lifting ramp you cant do it better --Simonizer 11:20, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment I have to thank all of you. It is a great community we are a part of. I'm quite fascinated by the comment of Tomascastelazo. You made me think about the way I judge pictures. That's great. A good motivation to go out and create more little pieces of art with my camera. --JuliusR 12:16, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 13 support, 1 oppose, 2 neutral => featured. Cecil 04:12, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]