Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cropped Kitten Bondage.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Pornographic, poor quality, out of scope, not linked to except on a single user page (clean-up project) JN466 02:01, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
- Delete' (as uploader), as I have recently become less confident that Cuirjean is using legitimate CC-BY tags. Max Rebo Band"almost suspiciously excellent" 14:22, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
- Perhaps Cuirjean did respect CC-BY ("by triggerhappyphoto") and you didn't. Erik Warmelink (talk) 23:15, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
- Keep No Pornography according to German (or as far as I know any other European) law. Same goes for the other BDSM-images shown here. --TheK (talk) 14:59, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Not pornographic, charges of pornography slanderous. --Melanom (talk) 15:52, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Bondage is not per se Pornography. This is clearly POV.Nemissimo (talk) 00:55, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Belongs to float of DRs from Jayen466 and is POV. Sorry, but that's nonsens. This image is surely not pornographic. Antonsusi (talk) 01:55, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
- Delete per Max Rebo Band. Too many different camera models in EXIF: Panasonic DMC-FZ50, SONY DSC-S80, FUJIFILM FinePix6900ZOOM, Canon EOS 10D, Canon EOS 20D (most of pictures don't have EXIF at all). It means nothing, of course -- shots had been taken during a large time frame, but due to circumstances... Trycatch (talk) 09:15, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Only used on one user's talk page, the first vote Max Rebo Band. Uploaded by him. Scope says that such are not allowed as we are not a host of personal images for a gallery on user pages as this image is. Ottava Rima (talk) 23:52, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Not pornographic, usable for articles, within scope; no demonstrated reason to suspect licensing. DGG (talk) 20:26, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
- Delete, along with all cuirjean@flickr photos. No personal release information, and I do not think cuirjean was the author of that photostream; user has since left flickr. –SJ+ 08:28, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
- Delete per Max Rebo Band, as a possible copyright violation. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 19:53, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
- Delete per uploaders request. - Stillwaterising (talk) 18:30, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - A mass deletion of all cuirjean@flickr images has been started at Commons:Deletion requests/Images of author Cuirjean@flickr - Stillwaterising (talk) 18:57, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
- Keep just mention that triggerhappyphoto is the author. Erik Warmelink (talk) 23:15, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
- KeepI see no reason for deletion --Ladislav Faigl (talk) 07:47, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
Deleted Quality + uploaders request abf «Cabale!» 23:14, 22 May 2010 (UTC)