Commons:Deletion requests/File:500px photo (30081581).jpeg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
meaningless file name, unidentifiable subject, uncategorized Mztourist (talk) 10:50, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
Keep @Mztourist I really fail to understand what is your point with these nominations, instead of fixing the issues that may exist with the files. This is a photo from a natural reserve municipal committee comunity meeting in São Paulo, obviously on scope. Darwin Ahoy! 20:46, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
- User:DarwIn my point with these nominations is to make mass uploaders like you stop and think about whether each image is really worth uploading in the first place(is it "educationally useful" - which is the entire purpose of this project), choose a distinct file name, provide a description and a few categories. You say that this is a natural reserve municipal committee comunity meeting in São Paulo, great, only you know that, so why didn't you add that detail and categories when you uploaded the image? Are you trying to add useful searchable images or are you trying to just upload as many images as possible with no concern for the work this creates for others? Mztourist (talk) 03:04, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Mztourist Why don't you collaborate with the project, instead of acting destructively? Darwin Ahoy! 20:06, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
- @DarwIn, why don't you observe the Commons:Project scope and stop adding images without also adding any basic information that makes them searchable and educationally useful? That would really aid collaboration. Mztourist (talk) 03:51, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Mztourist Right... Continue doing what you are doing, if it makes you happy 🤷. Darwin Ahoy! 18:49, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- @DarwIn do you really think that adding images without meaningful names, descriptions, locations and categories serves the purpose of this project? Mztourist (talk) 02:48, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Mztourist Right... Continue doing what you are doing, if it makes you happy 🤷. Darwin Ahoy! 18:49, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- @DarwIn, why don't you observe the Commons:Project scope and stop adding images without also adding any basic information that makes them searchable and educationally useful? That would really aid collaboration. Mztourist (talk) 03:51, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Mztourist Why don't you collaborate with the project, instead of acting destructively? Darwin Ahoy! 20:06, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
- User:DarwIn my point with these nominations is to make mass uploaders like you stop and think about whether each image is really worth uploading in the first place(is it "educationally useful" - which is the entire purpose of this project), choose a distinct file name, provide a description and a few categories. You say that this is a natural reserve municipal committee comunity meeting in São Paulo, great, only you know that, so why didn't you add that detail and categories when you uploaded the image? Are you trying to add useful searchable images or are you trying to just upload as many images as possible with no concern for the work this creates for others? Mztourist (talk) 03:04, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, per discussion. --Strakhov (talk) 01:16, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}