Yann

Colleague @Yann: I am the author of the upload of this image and I want to delete it due to an error when checking the file for validity. After deleting, I will upload it with the correct code under the same name. I don't see any obstacles. — ArtSmir (talk) 13:23, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@ArtSmir: It doesn't work that way. If the file is in use, it won't be deleted. Yann (talk) 13:45, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Yann: That is, it all comes down to the fact that this file is used in 6 articles? — ArtSmir (talk) 14:09, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Is the validity of an image overridden by how many pages the file is in use? VihirLak007 (talk) 18:31, 19 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@VihirLak007: More or less, yes. In brief, if an image is used, it can only be deleted if it is a copyright violation. Yann (talk) 18:50, 19 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Noted. Thanks VihirLak007 (talk) 18:52, 19 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello Yann, I hope you're doing well. Would you mind closing the DR. Thanks for your consideration. C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 10:38, 19 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Done Deleted. Yann (talk) 14:54, 19 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Please, can you put this back. I mad it myself so no copyright vio. Greetings. Vdkdaan (talk) 17:24, 19 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

And free of use for everybody if they use the same therems of use (also free)Vdkdaan (talk) 17:26, 19 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Vdkdaan: You didn't provide a license, and this may be a derivative work of the performance. Yann (talk) 17:39, 19 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

I can provid the license. I mad it mayself. I can only put it when it is back on wikimedia. So iu repaet my qution. Can you put it back please so i can put the licens. Vdkdaan (talk) 07:02, 20 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Vdkdaan: Please read what I wrote above, and COM:DW. I won't restore this. You can ask on COM:UDR, but I doubt it will be restored. Yann (talk) 07:07, 20 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Yann: , ok i read it. I understand now. I tought if i made the video it can put it here. No problems. Thanks for the effort and time. Vdkdaan (talk) 08:57, 21 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Same for this one. Vdkdaan (talk) 17:30, 19 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Vdkdaan: Here also, you didn't provide a license. Yann (talk) 17:39, 19 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Vdkdaan: OK done here. Yann (talk) 07:05, 20 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thx, Vdkdaan (talk) 08:57, 21 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hey, saw that you did a lot of the deletions on commons, and I am wondering what you workflow is. I am trying to learn more as I apply for Adminiship, Sadads (talk) 21:34, 19 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Sadads: Hi, I start from the backlog, and I mostly delete speedy deletion requests, selfies, and copyright violations. I also regularly tag and delete Media uploaded without a license, which are mostly copyright violations. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:56, 19 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! I also just found Help:Gadget-DelReqHandler -- I am kindof suprised its not available to other trusted users who could close or relist requests, Sadads (talk) 22:11, 19 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I am having trouble with the File:里湯昔話 雄山荘.jpg file, which has been deleted repeatedly. This image is on our computer and I created it. I looked at the license page, but I cannot figure out what exactly we are supposed to do. Please tell us how to upload the image in a way that is easy to understand. 佐藤３５ (talk) 00:13, 20 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@佐藤３５: Hi, Being in your computer doesn't give the copyright to you. It seems to have been copied from the Internet, so who is the photographer? Yann (talk) 06:07, 20 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you very much. 佐藤３５ (talk) 02:02, 30 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

I just reviewed and found that some of the user's edits you just reverted is not a vandalism so I restored some of it. But all other edits of this user does. Anyways thanks for your cooperation -- Nvdtn19 (talk) 14:03, 20 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ah yes thanks. I reverted everything, not knowing if they were OK or not. Yann (talk) 14:09, 20 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Good morning (here) Yann: Why did you do this? It seems to me that the request by Bấy bi cute, while problematic, should stand. I don't see why we should accept its deletion by Cherry Cotton Candy, who is a new user whose only action is the deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:18, 20 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Or maybe you actually restored the original request but confused me with your explanation? .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 20 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Jameslwoodward: Hi Jim, Actually I restored the request added by Băng Tỏa and removed by Bấy bi cute. It seems clear to me that Bấy bi cute is a VOA, probably a sock. Yann (talk) 14:44, 20 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Now, I don't know about how closing practices on commons differ from those on enwiki, but this smells like a supervote to me. Would you consider re-opening? Cremastra (talk) 17:25, 22 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Cremastra: Opinions in deletion requests are not votes. There has been an extensive discussion on COM:VPC about this, and there is no doubt that this is in the public domain, both in France and in USA. Yann (talk) 17:38, 22 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

w:File:C.I.D. (1956).webm

w:File:Madhumati (1958) poster.jpg

Yours sincerely, GaiusAugustine (talk) 18:35, 22 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Yann:Hi,Regarding the too simple in Venezuela my answer: it does not say clearly in the COM:Venezuela but Bedivere is right in this DR there are complex logos than simple ones, in some cases it is necessary to add PD-textlogo but can publish complex logos rather than simple ones if they were created by public sectors ({{PD-VenezuelaGov}}) (Google translator) AbchyZa22 (talk) 22:01, 22 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

I see that you deleted several gallery pages with template {{SD|GA1}} and more than one image (2-6), that were nominated for deletion by Adamant1. Is there no check before an administrator deletes a gallery page whether the template has been used properly? I thought this template is only for gallery pages with zero or one image. Is that not true? Can the template also be used for other numbers of images? It is at least about:

• Rosa 'Charlotte'
• Rosa 'Celsiana'
• Rosa 'Carefree Delight'
• Rosa 'Carefree Beauty'
• Rosa 'Amber Flush'
• Rosa 'Alberta'
• Rosa 'Condesa de Barcelona'
• Rosa 'Blue Ribbon'
• Rosa 'Borderer'

JopkeB (talk) 04:12, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Not to highjack the discussion, but @JopkeB: Is there a reason your not willing to take it to requests for undeletion like @Alachuckthebuck: suggested on the ANU board? That seems like the more appropriate venue. Really to repeat what they said, this really just comes off like IDONTLIKEIT. You filed opened two ANU requests, both of which didn't seem go anywhere except for multiple people essentially telling you it's not an issue. So now your lobbying individual admins. Your clearly refusing to listen. Regardless, why not do this through a requests for undeletion like everyone else? I'm more then willing to lay my case out in an undeletion request about why I don't think the galleries are useful. Your kind of getting in the way of that or there being a consensus about it one or another by not going through the proper channels though. I'm certainly willing to not nominate galleries with multiple images for deletion again if there's a consensus that there should be a hard and fast rule on it. From what I've seen your the only one who has that opinion and at least IMO there's no point in restoring the galleries if nominating them for deletion isn't actually an issue. --Adamant1 (talk) 04:40, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@JopkeB, You are talking your way into a 1-way IBAN. I'm not trying to threaten you, but that is where this is going. You might want to read the harassment policy, if you haven't already. @Adamant1 and myself both said these claims will be heard and addressed with civility and in good faith at requests for undeletion. Considering this is your 3rd post (and second noticeboard) about this one incident, this might my your last chance to drop the stick without sanctions. No one is out to get you, and we know we aren't perfect, but there is the right place to ask for a mistake to be fixed, and a lot of wrong places. Admin's talk pages are the worst place to complain about an editor. All the Best -- Chuck ^Talk 04:52, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

1. This post is not about a complaint about Adamant1, but about how administrators handle speedy deletions that perhaps should have been deletions requests.
2. And if it was: the first line in Commons:Undeletion_requests#Appealing_a_deletion is that you may discuss the deletion with the administrator who deleted the pages. So what is wrong with this post?

JopkeB (talk) 05:20, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

I think if multiple people asks someone several times to do it through an undeletion request then probably they should do it that way regardless of what the page says. Otherwise its just Wikilawyer. BTW, as I mentioned to JopkeB on her talk page there's multiple reasons to think the galleries were created as part of a paid editing campaign around roses. Assuming I'm correct then I think its worth deleting the galleries anyway regardless of how many images they have. Although I'm not advocating for just deleting all of them, but the ones with only a few images and mainly, if not exclusively, serve as promotional spam should be. --Adamant1 (talk) 07:42, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@JopkeB, Alachuckthebuck, and Adamant1: Did you get an agreement about these pages in one way, or another? Yann (talk) 22:17, 24 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

It seems like the single image galleries are fine to delete. It's still up in the air about the multiple image ones with images of the children though. So you might want to hold of on those for now until a DR having to do with them is finished. I think everyone agrees that single image galleries can be speedy deleted though. I'm not sure how that relates to the galleries JopkeB wants you to restore since I don't remember how many images they had or what the circumstances were. But you can probably at least deal with the back log in the meantime. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:24, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Yann I wasn't involved in the content dispute, but my take is that whatver @JopkeB was appealing, should go into a requests for undeletion, and everything else stands as is, DR pending. @Adamant1 , please let me know if I'm missing somthing. All the Best -- Chuck ^Talk 00:54, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@JopkeB and Adamant1: Then please remove the SD tag when it is not warranted, and tell me when it is done. It is very cumbersome to check hundreds of pages. Yann (talk) 09:49, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

I was planning on doing it. I just haven't been around my computer. I'll let you know when I'm done though. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:16, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Alright. I went through them and I think it's just single image galleries now. --Adamant1 (talk) 12:52, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi Yann,

You know, I would rather assume that these actions were taken by another user (I won't make any guesses since the city of the IP address don't match the one I thought it was). User:TolyastarRUSSIAz is hardly experienced enough to make COM:AN requests. If you know more than me, just ignore my opinion. Thanks! Quick1984 (talk) 19:36, 24 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

3 day block of the IP in this case is fine by me. Abzeronow (talk) 19:41, 24 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

What bothers me is that [1] was probably said to the wrong person. Quick1984 (talk) 19:43, 24 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

OK, I reverted that. Yann (talk) 21:16, 24 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

When I changed https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/New_York_Tribune/1869/A_Lottery_Case the name of the file, it looks like it wasn't replaced automatically at Wikisource. Can you see if it is replaced when you look at it, so I can see if a problem with the move function or with my cache. Thanks. RAN (talk) 23:47, 24 September 2024 (UTC) I added in the new file name it is missing in several browsers, but you can see it did not replace properly: https://en.wikisource.org/w/index.php?title=New_York_Tribune/1869/A_Lottery_Case&oldid=13365643 --RAN (talk) 23:53, 24 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi Yann,

You have sent me a warning w.r.t copyright violations, however I have uploaded majority of photos that are owned by me. The rest were publicly available to which I responded to the editors. Since they have refused, I now only upload those pieces of work owned by me. I have also sent an email to permissions wiki permissions-commons@wikimedia.org w.r.t the relevant photos which I have released permission to wikipedia. It would be unfortunate for me to be put on the watchlist and blocked for donating items from my family library for usage. Please rectify the same. ChangeDavid (talk) 10:19, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@ChangeDavid: "Owned by you" and "publicly available" do not make you the copyright owner, who is usually the photographer. Please read COM:L and COM:DW. Thanks, Yann (talk) 10:35, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi Yann,

I understood and are not uploading any publicly available items anymore. However w.r.t Dr Jaime Valfredo Rangel, I have given the email confirmation to Wikipedia. This was published through his publishing Tipografia Rangel prior to his death where he was the copyright owner. He passed away in 1959. While his possessions are transferred, the copyright effectively becomes of free use. Therefore I continue to upload documents of his. Trust this confirms the matters and these ones can be corrected. You may check for emails from davidspinto@gmail.com ChangeDavid (talk) 12:40, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

To clarify, the publishing and documentation is transferred to me and I have provided a legal confirmation for the same to Wikipedia ChangeDavid (talk) 12:41, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

In addition to the above, I am willing to give confirmation in whatever way required that no copyright impediments will be there, and I have liability for the same. ChangeDavid (talk) 12:55, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Donald Trump cutout (53932101541).jpg - Here is a second Deletion Request on this same file. In my original DR regarding this file I wrote, "likely copyrighted photograph from unknown photographer." I failed to note that my DR comment was related to the cutout image within the photograph itself. This file should have been deleted under COM:DW and COM:PCP. Thank you for your continuing good works, -- Ooligan (talk) 15:37, 26 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Pinging @Yann. Your response would be appreciated. Thank you, -- Ooligan (talk) 23:05, 30 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello Yann, Does COM:FOP India apply to this File:GQ x FOSSILS with Shruti Hassan.webm under "any other work of artistic craftsmanship"..? --Gpkp (talk) 15:49, 27 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Gpkp: Hi, I don't think there is anything under a copyright in the content. I see only ordinary fashion items. Artistic craftsmanship concerns folk art and the like (ceramics, embroidery, etc.). Yann (talk) 15:54, 27 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you Yann.. Can you please see this..?
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Gpkp (talk • contribs) 15:57, 27 September 2024 (UTC+05:30)

Hello Yann, I hope you're doing well. Would you mind closing the DR. Thanks for your consideration. C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 05:24, 28 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@C1K98V: Hi, Actually, I don't know what to do with this file. I don't see what educational use it could have, but some other people want to keep it. Yann (talk) 07:41, 28 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, maybe you forgot to close Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mai Vu Minh Forbes.jpg? --Tmv (talk) 06:19, 29 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi

Do you have an opinion for this photo ? Panam2014 (talk) 18:29, 29 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Harini Amarasuriya. Yann (talk) 19:18, 29 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello @Yann this needs to looked. Skratata69 continues to mark his uploads and review GODL-India files as license review passed. See File:Narendra Modi during the Quad Summit, 2024 - 2.png or File:Narendra Modi addressing to people of Maharashtra - 2.jpg or File:Narendra Modi addressing to people of Maharashtra - 3.jpg. This is not the first instance. He has been told previously at his talk page not to do so by a reviewer after I brought it to their attention. He promised not to do it in future. But he seems to be not understanding. This time it might need an admin intervention so I am telling you. Thank you. ShaanSengupta^Talk 16:55, 30 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Done Indeed this is a problem. Blocked for 2 weeks. Yann (talk) 17:51, 30 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for addressing this Yann. One question. You marked a GODL file uploaded by him as missing permission. How can he send the Permission when the source is the X account of PMO. It means it is a work of GoI. Also are images taken from PMO India's X account also under GODL. A few weeks ago I nominated a chunk of these types taken from X for SD. But I was asked to file a DR if I thought that those aren't included. Can you please clear the air. Or shall we start a discussion over this. Bcoz I am not confirm about status of images on GoI social media accounts. ShaanSengupta^Talk 18:21, 30 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Shaan Sengupta: I have asked a few years back that an Indian lawyer reviews the scope of the GODL. Some people in India said they will look after it. I was never done. So it is still unclear to which files the GODL applies. We certainly shouldn't apply it to files from X, unless we have a copy from a government website. Missing permission means there is one-week delay before the file to be deleted. That should be sufficient for finding a copy elsewhere. Yann (talk) 18:28, 30 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

You say that we shouldn't apply it files from X unless we have a copy from a gov web.. I agree. I was referring to a message by @King of Hearts at my talk page when I filed in bulk SD's. I belive there is a need to start a discussion. But again as you say, you couldn't get a clear response last time. So is there a way this can be brought to attention of the WMF so that they can officially get a clarity on it. Something like an office action. Bcoz this needs to be clarified. We can't keep using files that (if it) violates the rules. ShaanSengupta^Talk 18:35, 30 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Shaan Sengupta: It may be better not to create a speedy deletion request, unless the image was obviously not created by the Indian government. So a regular deletion request is appropriate. Yann (talk) 18:40, 30 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Yes, that part is understood. I should definitely have gone for the DR. But the big question still remains unanswered. ShaanSengupta^Talk 18:42, 30 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 14 October 2024, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi. The one which are still there, are they kept or failed to delete? --Krd 12:16, 2 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

FP suggestion. ★ 02:04, 4 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Why did you give User:Tuválkin a temporary (rather than indefinite) block? As a completely uninvolved user who’s never met them, their history looks both serious and intractable (especially for a veteran user who should seriously know better). Dronebogus (talk) 04:46, 4 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Dronebogus: Hi, I am not opposed to an indefinite block, but I think that requires more opinions. If you want to request one, please be my guest. Yann (talk) 08:35, 4 October 2024 (UTC)Reply