Kaethe17
 First steps tutorialOur first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.  Getting helpMore information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
 Goodies, tips, and tricks
 Made a mistake?
|
Copyright status: File:G-63-11105 Postkarte-Frauenportraet-ONLINE.jpg
edit
Copyright status: File:G-63-11105 Postkarte-Frauenportraet-ONLINE.jpg
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:G-63-11105 Postkarte-Frauenportraet-ONLINE.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
- File:G-63-11110 Postkarte-Fotografie-E-Hennings-m-Hut-ONLINE.jpg
- File:G-63-11177 Zeichnung-Frauenakt-im-Kostuem-ONLINE.jpg
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 19:07, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:David-bielander-by-helen-britton-09-2021.jpg
edit
Copyright status: File:David-bielander-by-helen-britton-09-2021.jpg
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:David-bielander-by-helen-britton-09-2021.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:05, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Saeed-roustayi-filmfest-muenchen-2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hostessen-outfit-olympia-1972-mineralogia-2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Joana-aderi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nevin-aladag-villa-stuck-tusch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
edit| ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Nevin-aladag-villa-stuck-tusch.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nevin-aladag-villa-stuck-tusch.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
Copyright status: File:David-bielander-by-helen-britton-09-2021.jpg
editCopyright status: File:David-bielander-by-helen-britton-09-2021.jpg
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:David-bielander-by-helen-britton-09-2021.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:05, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
File:Ino-athens-snowblind-2022.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Hallo Kaethe17, per G7 kann das Bild nicht gelöscht werden, da es in Nutzung ist. Was meinst du mit "copyright issues"? Laut der Quellsite ist es CC-BY-SA. --Túrelio (talk) 11:27, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Túrelio, das Stadtmuseum, aus deren Sammlung Online es stammt, hat gerade einen Bug der Sammlung Online gemeldet. Das Bild wird als CC BY SA 4.0 ausgespielt, ist aber nicht frei. Deswegen muss es leider aus Urheberrechtsgründen wieder gelöscht werden. Wie geht man da am besten vor? --Kaethe17 (talk) 11:31, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
(Ich kopiere User:Münchner Stadtmuseum auch mal hier rein)
- Ich habe es jetzt als "copyvio" gelöscht. Falls es doch frei sein sollte, kann es auf Antrag wiederhergestellt werden. --Túrelio (talk) 11:38, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
- Vielen Dank für die Info, Túrelio --Kaethe17 (talk) 11:40, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
- Ich habe es jetzt als "copyvio" gelöscht. Falls es doch frei sein sollte, kann es auf Antrag wiederhergestellt werden. --Túrelio (talk) 11:38, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
editSome contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 09:33, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Krokoit-Vauquelinit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tetraedrit-kupferkies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mimetesit-wulfenit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vanadinit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wolframit-beryll.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Amazonit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Atakamit-chile.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chalkopyrit-malachit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Descloizit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Gabriele Münter
editHall Kaethe17, könntest Du bitte die Lizenz von File:FM-2012-249--Arnim-G-Muenter-Gabriele-1 2-ONLINE.jpg nochmal überprüfen, ich finden den Vermerk für die angegebene Lizenz[1] in der Quelle nicht. --Ailura (talk) 13:58, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Ailura, komisch, das stand da schon mal richtig, und ich hab auch noch die Mail vom Museum, dass sie es freigeben. Ich hab die Museumsleute mal angeschrieben und meld mich, sobald ich die Antwort habe. --Kaethe17 (talk) 14:53, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Ailura, das Museum kann die freie Lizenz doch nicht erteilen. Ich hab speedy deletion beantragt. Sorry. --Kaethe17 (talk) 19:07, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Filmfest München
editDürfte ich mal fragen, welche Filme dich bei der diesjährigen Ausgabe des Filmfests interessieren? Ich hätte nämlich großes Interesse an Fotos von allen Beteiligten, die dort irgendwie auftauchen von:
- The Settlers (Originaltitel Los Colonos) von Felipe Gálvez Haberle
- Pretty Red Dress von Dionne Edwards
- Dead Girls Dancing von Anna Roller
- Fancy Dance von Erica Tremblay
- und besonders von Gena Marvin aus dem Dokumentarfilm Queendom
Die Artikel bräuchten alle noch Fotos und ich würde die dann auch einbauen. Schonmal vorab vielen Dank für alle Fotos, die du dort machst...--IgorCalzone1 (talk) 08:47, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Hi IgorCalzone1,
- dieses Jahr wird das nichts mehr, denn aus Zeitgründen kann ich nur noch einen Filmfest-Film schauen. Für nächstes Jahr könnten wir uns vielleicht absprechen, falls sich da mal mehr Muße (und damit mehr Filmbesuche) einrichten lässt. Prinzipiell bin ich eher in der Independent-Ecke zu finden :-) Schönen Gruß Kaethe17 (talk) 16:13, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Schade. Dann viel Spaß bei dem einen Film; hoffe der ist gut. Grüße aus Berlin. --IgorCalzone1 (talk) 21:56, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
editSome contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:52, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Katzenhaie-lokalicon-2024.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Notification about possible deletion
editSome contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 16:58, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Monumento-a-pier-paolo-pasolini-2024.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Folke-koeberling-muro-di-lana-villa-massimo-2024.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File tagging File:Black box 317 - Digitalausgabe.pdf
editThis media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Black box 317 - Digitalausgabe.pdf. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Rosenzweig τ 10:20, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- I just reminded the copyright holder to send her permission. Kaethe17 (talk) 10:36, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
File:David-torres-me-white-gold-bampi-preis-meissen-24.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
