[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 30, Number 11—November 2024
Dispatch

Clinical and Molecular Characterization of Human Burkholderia mallei Infection, Brazil

Author affiliation: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil (K.G. Luz); Universidade Potiguar, Natal (F.R.O. Bezerra); Casa de Saúde São Lucas, Natal (M.A. Sicolo); Laboratório DNA Center, Natal (A.A.R.S. Silva); Embrapa Beef Cattle, Campo Grande, Brazil (A.A. Egito, P.A.P. Suniga, J.C.K. Moriya, M.G. Santos, C. Mantovani, J.S. Silva, L.R. Santos, F.R. Araújo); Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande (N.F. Almeida); University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil (A.M.S. Guimarães), Oswaldo Cruz Institute, FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (A.M.R. Dávila, R. Jardim)

Cite This Article

Abstract

We report a case of Burkholderia mallei causing glanders in a 73-year-old patient from the Northeast Region of Brazil. The patient was hospitalized with severe pneumonia. PCR and genomic sequencing confirmed B. mallei in pleural drainage. Genotyping revealed a novel genotype, emphasizing the need for genetic surveillance in zoonotic infections.

Burkholderia mallei is a gram-negative bacterium that causes glanders disease, which primarily affects equids. B. mallei can infect humans and cause clinical manifestations ranging from subclinical infections to severe conditions such as septicemia or pneumonia. Treatment and prevention are difficult because of antimicrobial resistance, intracellular survival, and lack of a vaccine (1). In Brazil, B. mallei infections in equids have occurred across various regions (26). However, genotyping studies of B. mallei strains are limited. In the Northeast Region of Brazil, strains with lineages and branches L3B2, L3B3, and L3B2 have been identified. In the Southeast Region of Brazil, genotype L3B2 has been reported (2,4,5).

Surveillance and scientific understanding of human B. mallei infection in Brazil remain limited. B. mallei was identified in a case involving a child from the Northeast Region of Brazil (7). However, that publication did not specify the diagnostic methodology used to confirm the pathogen’s identity. Accurate diagnostics are crucial because melioidosis caused by B. pseudomallei, which can lead to similar clinical and pathological outcomes, is also found in Brazil (8).

We report a case of B. mallei infection in a patient from Brazil. This case provides insights into the probable transmission context, clinical symptoms, treatment approaches, and methods for detecting B. mallei.

The Study

Figure 1

Computed tomography with contrast of the chest of a patient from Brazil infected with Burkholderia mallei. A) Coronal section, showing a heterogeneous pattern of lung attenuation. Arrows marked 1 indicate a suggestive disturbance in the ventilation-perfusion relationship. B) Axial section. Arrow marked 2 indicates consolidative opacities. Arrows marked 3 indicate subsegmental atelectasis in both lungs.

Figure 1. Computed tomography with contrast of the chest of a patient from Brazil infected with Burkholderia mallei. A) Coronal section, showing a heterogeneous pattern of lung attenuation. Arrows marked...

A 73-year-old man residing in Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, northeast Brazil, was hospitalized with complaints of fever and respiratory symptoms (Appendix). The patient’s medical history revealed his horse was in contact with a glanders-positive horse at a vaquejada training center. In the Northeast Region, equestrian events bring together horses from various sources, which increases the risk for B. mallei transmission and infection. Close interactions between horse owners and horses raise the likelihood of human exposure to infected animals. After 6 days of hospitalization, the patient underwent a computed tomography of his chest (Figure 1). On day 7 of hospitalization, a 25-mL sample of pleural drainage was collected and transported to the Embrapa Beef Cattle Biosafety Level 3 laboratory in Campo Grande, Brazil.

We extracted DNA from the pleural drainage by using a DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (QIAGEN, https://www.qiagen.com). We conducted microbiome DNA enrichment by using the NEBNext microbiome DNA enrichment kit (New England Biolabs, https://www.neb.com). We inoculated 100 μL of pleural drainage onto 5% sheep blood agar with 2% glycerol and incubated aerobically at 37°C for 24–72 hours. We cultured 100 μL of pleural drainage in 3 mL of brain heart infusion medium with 2% glycerol, with and without penicillin G and polymyxin B, and incubated at 37°C with shaking for 24 hours. From each brain–heart infusion culture, we plated 50 μL on glycerinated blood agar and incubated at 37°C with shaking for 24 hours.

We subcultured colonies matching the macroscopic identification of B. mallei on semi-selective agar with penicillin G (100 U/mL), polymyxin B (50 U/mL), disodium ticarcillin (32 μg/mL), ampicillin (32 μg/mL), and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) (50 μg/mL + 10 μg/mL), and incubated for <72 hours. The pleural drainage culture initially grew slowly on glycerinated blood agar. Subsequent plating on semiselective agar and agar without antimicrobial drugs led to the isolation of colonies with consistent morphology. We chose a single colony and cultivated on glycerinated blood agar, yielding multiple colonies with identical morphology. We then collected the colonies for DNA extraction and PCR analysis.

We extracted DNA from bacterial isolates by using a modified protocol (9). Conventional PCR targeted specific genetic loci from pleural drainage and bacterial isolates (Appendix Table 1). Each PCR reaction included a negative control and a positive control (B. mallei DNA, strain BAC 86/19) (5). We included PCR extraction controls (parallel DNA extraction of E. coli) in assays targeting fliP-IS407A (Appendix Table 1) with DNA from pleural drainage and fliP-IS407A (Appendix Table 1) with DNA from bacterial colonies. PCR conducted by using DNA extracted directly from bacterial colonies included control DNA from a field strain of B. pseudomallei supplied by the Ceará Central Laboratory, Brazil. We included the control DNA in reactions targeting the multiple-locus variable number tandem repeat analysis marker Bm17. We analyzed PCR products by using gel electrophoresis and whole-genome sequencing (Appendix).

Figure 2

Synteny graph between the assembled genome (bottom) and the reference genome (top) of Burkholderia mallei recovered from a patient in Brazil. The lines represent regions of similarity; blue lines indicate sense and red lines antisense.

Figure 2. Synteny graph between the assembled genome (bottom) and the reference genome (top) of Burkholderia malleirecovered from a patient in Brazil. The lines represent regions of similarity; blue lines...

PCR amplifications targeting B. mallei loci (Appendix Table 1) from pleural drainage and bacterial isolate DNA yielded positive results. In addition, Burk475 PCR, which is designed to detect both B. mallei and B. pseudomallei, demonstrated positive amplification. The PCR targeting the open reading frame 11 marker for B. pseudomallei was negative (Figures 1, 2; Appendix). The amplicon sequencing results (Appendix Table 2) confirmed exact matches with B. mallei from PCR targeting the species.

The bacterial genome sequencing revealed 5,506,149 reads (National Center for Biotechnology Information Sequence Read Archive accession no. PRJNA1130892). De novo assembly produced 881 contigs, with an N50 of 2,605,114 bp. Synteny analysis indicated 112 regions shared similarity with B. mallei (Figure 2). BLASTX analysis (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) showed 110 contigs (12.48%) matched both B. mallei and B. pseudomallei with 100% identity, whereas 59 contigs (6.69%) specifically matched B. mallei, differing from B. pseudomallei because of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), insertions, or deletions (Appendix Table 3).

Analysis identified an SNP at position 1,163,826 in the reference genome of B. mallei. In the human-origin isolate studied (B. mallei Natal strain), this SNP manifested as a T allele, a characteristic feature observed in isolates belonging to the L2B2sB1Gp1 lineage.

Conclusions

We successfully detected B. mallei in this patient by using various PCR targets, directly from both pleural drainage and bacterial cultures. The methodology included culturing a limited number of bacterial colonies from the sample, followed by subculturing to various media and antimicrobial drug conditions. Necessary to the process was the careful selection of colonies on the basis of consistent morphological characteristics, which was essential for the subsequent PCR detection.

The presence of a limited number of contigs showing identity with Burkholderia species in the genome sequencing of the PCR-positive colony suggests the potential coculturing of competing microbiota. However, 59 contigs showed exact matches with B. mallei, distinguishing them from B. pseudomallei because of variations such as SNPs, insertions, or deletions. Those matches aligned consistently with the reference B. mallei genome and were validated across multiple other B. mallei genomes, confirming the presence of this species in the sample through genome sequencing.

A SNP characteristic of isolates from the L2B2sB1Gp1 lineage was identified in the B. mallei Natal strain. This lineage includes strains from the United States and Burma (ATCC 23344) from humans and strains from Myanmar and China from equids (10). Of note, in Brazil only isolates from lineage 3 have been reported, all from equids (2,4,5).

Treating glanders disease is challenging because of B. mallei’s resistance to many common antimicrobial drugs. A recent case from China highlighted initial therapy failure with levofloxacin and cefotaxime/sulbactam, but success was achieved by adding meropenem, doxycycline, and TMP/SMX (11). In Iran, effective treatment involved imipenem and doxycycline (12), aligning with established guidelines for managing zoonotic glanders (13). In this case, initial treatment with ceftriaxone followed by meropenem and azithromycin did not improve symptoms. However, combining meropenem, linezolid, TMP/SMX, and levofloxacin resulted in improvement in the patient’s condition.

Human glanders disease is likely underreported and underrecognized, underscoring the importance of increased awareness among medical professionals. The use of effective antimicrobial drugs is necessary for patient treatment. Management of human B. mallei infections requires enhanced coordination between veterinary and human health specialists.

Dr. Luz is a professor at the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte. His interests include tropical diseases, infectious and parasitic diseases, sepsis, hospital-acquired infections, arboviruses, viral hepatitis, and human T-lymphotropic virus 1 and 2 infections.

Top

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (grant no. 315857/2021-8).

Top

References

  1. Waag  DM, Chance  TB, Trevino  SR, Rossi  FD, Fetterer  DP, Amemiya  K, et al. Comparison of three non-human primate aerosol models for glanders, caused by Burkholderia mallei. Microb Pathog. 2021;155:104919. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Laroucau  K, Lucia de Assis Santana  V, Girault  G, Martin  B, Miranda da Silveira  PP, Brasil Machado  M, et al. First molecular characterisation of a Brazilian Burkholderia mallei strain isolated from a mule in 2016. Infect Genet Evol. 2018;57:11720. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Abreu  DC, Gomes  AS, Tessler  DK, Chiebao  DP, Fava  CD, Romaldini  AHCN, et al. Systematic monitoring of glanders-infected horses by complement fixation test, bacterial isolation, and PCR. Vet Anim Sci. 2020;10:100147. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Falcão  MVD, Laroucau  K, Vorimore  F, Deshayes  T, Santana  VLA, Silva  KPC, et al. Molecular characterization of Burkholderia mallei strains isolated from horses in Brazil (2014-2017). Infect Genet Evol. 2022;99:105250. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Suniga  PAP, Mantovani  C, Dos Santos  MG, do Egito  AA, Verbisck  NV, Dos Santos  LR, et al. Glanders diagnosis in an asymptomatic mare from Brazil: insights from serology, microbiological culture, mass spectrometry, and genome sequencing. Pathogens. 2023a;12:1250. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Suniga  PAP, Mantovani  C, Santos  MG, Rieger  JSG, Gaspar  EB, Dos Santos  FL, et al. Molecular detection of Burkholderia mallei in different geographic regions of Brazil. Braz J Microbiol. 2023b;54:127585. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Santos Júnior  ELD, Moura  JCR, Protásio  BKPF, Parente  VAS, Veiga  MHND. Clinical repercussions of Glanders (Burkholderia mallei infection) in a Brazilian child: a case report. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2020;53:e20200054. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Velôso  DS, da Silva  SP, de Coelho  CMS, Parente  JML, Veloso  TAE, Lima  MM, et al. Emergence of melioidosis in Brazil: a case series. J Med Case Rep. 2023;17:362. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. van Embden  JD, Cave  MD, Crawford  JT, Dale  JW, Eisenach  KD, Gicquel  B, et al. Strain identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by DNA fingerprinting: recommendations for a standardized methodology. J Clin Microbiol. 1993;31:4069. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Girault  G, Wattiau  P, Saqib  M, Martin  B, Vorimore  F, Singha  H, et al. High-resolution melting PCR analysis for rapid genotyping of Burkholderia mallei. Infect Genet Evol. 2018;63:14. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. He  G, Zeng  Y, He  Q, Liu  T, Li  N, Lin  H, et al. A case report of Burkholderia mallei infection leading to pneumonia. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2023;26:2415. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Nasiri  M, Zarrin  A, RoshankarRudsari  S, Khodadadi  J. Glanders (Burkholderia mallei infection) in an Iranian man: A case report. IDCases. 2023;32:e01779. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Van Zandt  KE, Greer  MT, Gelhaus  HC. Glanders: an overview of infection in humans. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2013;8:131. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figures

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid3011.240549

Original Publication Date: October 19, 2024

Table of Contents – Volume 30, Number 11—November 2024

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Flábio Ribeiro de Araújo, Embrapa Beef Cattle, Avenida Rádio Maia, 830, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul 79106-550, Brazil

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: September 03, 2024
Page updated: November 01, 2024
Page reviewed: November 01, 2024
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external