[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 30, Number 1—January 2024
CME ACTIVITY - Synopsis

Auritidibacter ignavus, an Emerging Pathogen Associated with Chronic Ear Infections

Author affiliation: Saarland University Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Homburg/Saar, Germany

Cite This Article

Introduction

CME Logo

Medscape CME ACTIVITY

In support of improving patient care, this activity has been planned and implemented by Medscape, LLC and Emerging Infectious Diseases. Medscape, LLC is jointly accredited with commendation by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.

Medscape, LLC designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.00 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s). Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

Successful completion of this CME activity, which includes participation in the evaluation component, enables the participant to earn up to 1.0 MOC points in the American Board of Internal Medicine's (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program. Participants will earn MOC points equivalent to the amount of CME credits claimed for the activity. It is the CME activity provider's responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting ABIM MOC credit.

All other clinicians completing this activity will be issued a certificate of participation. To participate in this journal CME activity: (1) review the learning objectives and author disclosures; (2) study the education content; (3) take the post-test with a 75% minimum passing score and complete the evaluation at https://www.medscape.org/journal/eid; and (4) view/print certificate.

NOTE: It is Medscape's policy to avoid the use of Brand names in accredited activities. However, in an effort to be as clear as possible, the use of brand names should not be viewed as a promotion of any brand or as an endorsement by Medscape of specific products.

Release date: December 19, 2023; Expiration date: December 19, 2024
Learning Objectives

Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to:

  • Analyze the microbiology of Auritidibacter ignavus

  • Assess risk factors for A. ignavus otitis

  • Distinguish antimicrobial resistance patterns of A. ignavus

  • Identify physical findings associated with A. ignavus otitis

CME Editor

Thomas J. Gryczan, MS, Technical Writer/Editor, Emerging Infectious Diseases. Disclosure: Thomas J. Gryczan, MS, has no relevant financial relationships.

CME Author

Charles P. Vega, MD, Health Sciences Clinical Professor of Family Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, California. Disclosure: Charles P. Vega, MD, has the following relevant financial relationships: served as an advisor or consultant for Boehringer Ingelheim; GlaxoSmithKline; Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.

Authors

Sophie Roth, MD; Maximilian Linxweiler, MD; Jacqueline Rehner, MSc; Georges-Pierre Schmartz, MSc; Sören L. Becker, MD, PhD; Jan Philipp Kühn, MD.

Top

Abstract

We describe detection of the previously rarely reported gram-positive bacterium Auritidibacter ignavus in 3 cases of chronic ear infections in Germany. In all 3 cases, the patients had refractory otorrhea. Although their additional symptoms varied, all patients had an ear canal stenosis and A. ignavus detected in microbiologic swab specimens. A correct identification of A. ignavus in the clinical microbiology laboratory is hampered by the inability to identify it by using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Also, the bacterium might easily be overlooked because of its morphologic similarity to bacterial species of the resident skin flora. We conclude that a high index of suspicion is warranted to identify A. ignavus and that it should be particularly considered in patients with chronic external otitis who do not respond clinically to quinolone ear drop therapy.

Auritidibacter ignavus is an aerobic gram-positive, rod-shaped bacterium that was described by Yassin et al. in 2011 after isolation from an ear swab specimen (1). Thus far, all published cases with microbiological detection of A. ignavus were associated with ear infection that clinically manifested as otitis externa with otorrhea, which indicates a specific role of this pathogen in inflammatory diseases of the outer ear (13). However, only a limited number of cases have been published, and scant data are hampering valid conclusions on the clinical relevance and therapeutic implications of this pathogen. In addition, there are discrepant results with regard to susceptibility testing (1,2).

We describe 3 cases of patients with otorrhea caused by A. ignavus detected during March 2021 and October 2022 at the Saarland University Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene (Homburg/Saar, Germany); the total number of ear swab specimens analyzed for diagnostic purposes in the institute’s microbiology laboratory during 2021 and 2022 was 922. We provide an in-depth description of the clinical isolates, including their antimicrobial drug susceptibility patterns and strain comparison by whole-genome sequencing. Furthermore, we review the available literature pertaining to A. ignavus.

Case Reports

Written informed consent was obtained from the 3 patients to publish this case report. Patient 1 was a 50-year-old man who sought care for a chronic right-sided otorrhea caused by treatment-resistant external otitis, which had caused symptoms for several months. An outpatient topical treatment with ciprofloxacin ear drops for several weeks did not result in clinical improvement. At initial examination, the patient described persistent itching and otalgia on the affected ear. Clinical examination showed an extensive stenosis of the external auditory canal caused by multiple exostoses that narrowed the lumen by >50%. The ear canal appeared swollen and red by ear microscopy (Figure 1, panel A). The eardrum was covered with black fungal spores. Microbiological wound swab specimens showed A. ignavus and the dematiaceous fungus Exophiala dermatitidis. Thus, an alternating topical therapy with povidone-iodine drops and ethanol drops was initiated. Four weeks later, the patient reported major clinical improvement and absence of any symptoms. The examination showed a dry ear canal without any abnormal findings.

Patient 2 was a 72-year-old woman who sought care for slowly progressing conductive hearing loss of the right ear and occasional otorrhea. She denied any pain, dizziness, or tinnitus. Although an otologic examination of the left ear showed unremarkable findings, the right side showed a fibrotic, moist auditory canal with stenosis, which was suggestive of a postinflammatory acquired atresia of the external auditory canal (Figure 1, panel B). Audiometry showed an air bone gap of up to 20 dB on the right side with bilateral sensorineural normacusis. To exclude middle and inner ear affection or malformations, computed tomography was performed and showed a partial obstruction of the right external auditory canal by fibrous tissue without any additional pathologic findings. To widen the external auditory canal and to help with outer ear drainage, we performed a meatoplasty. Because the otorrhea did not subside postoperatively, we obtained a microbiological swab specimen, which grew A. ignavus. A topical therapy with ethanol drops and nourishing oil drops led to a long-lasting improvement of symptoms without recurring otorrhea.

Patient 3 was a 76-year-old man who had lichen planus and sought care for recurrent otorrhea of both ears for >2 months. He reported no otalgia, vertigo, or tinnitus. A symmetric presbycusis had remained unchanged for years and was treated with conventional hearing aids. On examination, both auditory canals were moist and constricted, clinically manifesting as inflammatory meatal fibrosis, a common finding in patients who have lichen planus. Result of a computed tomography scan showed a bilateral circumferential bony overgrowth of the osseous external auditory canal. A microbiological swab specimen led to the identification of A. ignavus in both ears. Thus, a topical therapy with ethanol drops and a tincture of isopropyl alcohol, glycerin, acetic acid, and peppermint oil was initiated. At follow-up after 3 weeks, both auditory canals were dry and without signs of acute infection but with an unchanged fibrotic stenosis.

Microbiological Characteristics of A. ignavus

In all 3 cases, microbiological ear swab specimens were subjected to standard microbiological culture methods (i.e., incubation on tryptic soy blood agar and chocolate agar for >48 hours). After 1 day of incubation, small white-gray colonies appeared (Figure 2), which changed to a gray-yellow appearance with a slimy surface over the course of few days. On Gram staining, gram-positive rods were observed, with a partially coccoid morphology.

No distinct identification was achieved by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (Bruker Daltonics). Thus, we performed a 16S broad-range PCR and subsequent Sanger sequencing. Analysis using a BLAST search (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST) based on the National Center for Biotechnology Information genome database showed a sequence homology >99% for A. ignavus in all 3 cases.

We performed antimicrobial susceptibility testing using epsilometry on Mueller-Hinton agar with 5% sheep blood. In the absence of specific species-related clinical breakpoints for A. ignavus, we assessed the MICs by using the non–species-related breakpoints put forth by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (https://www.eucast.org). We consistently noted high MICs for ciprofloxacin, which are likely to be associated with clinical failure of this drug. In contrast, all isolates were susceptible to β-lactam antimicrobial drugs and vancomycin (Table).

We extracted whole-genome DNA from isolates of A. ignavus by using the ZymoBIOMICS DNA Miniprep Kit (Zymo Research Corp.). We performed subsequent whole-genome sequencing by using Illumina PE150 (HiSeq), conducted by Novogene UK Ltd.. We performed quality control of sequencing output by using Fastp version 0.23.2 and MultiQC version 1.13a. We aligned reads against the reference genome of A. ignavus (CP031746.1 Auritidibacter sp. NML130574) by using Bowtie2 version 2.4. Variant calling using Freebayes version 1.3.2, filtering using Vcftools version 0.1.16 with a set threshold of 20, and comparison with Vcftools suggested that all 3 isolates were unrelated and had only 5,246 single-nucleotide polymorphisms in common (Figure 3).

Discussion

Auritidibacter spp. infections have rarely been reported in the literature. A systematic PubMed/MEDLINE search using the search term “Auritidibacter” yielded only 3 results. In 2011, Yassin et al. (1) provided a detailed account of this bacterium with a microbiological, biochemical, and phylogenic characterization. The phenotypic culture morphology pattern described in their work matched our own observations. Eight years later, Seth-Smith et al. (3) published a complete genome assembly of an isolate from Switzerland and compared it with 4 global genomes, which showed a high diversity within the species. That finding is consistent with our findings of only 24.4%–29.1% single-nucleotide polymorphism identity between the 3 different isolates from the 3 case-patients (Ai_01, 29.1%; Ai_02, 24.4%; Ai_03, 26.5%). More recently, Bernard et al. (2) investigated 4 isolates of the genus Auriditibacter by microbiological and biochemical detection methods, as well as whole-genome sequencing, to assess their relatedness to the species A. ignavus.

All of those studies reported only little clinical data of the included patients. We present a report that includes details on the patients’ clinical courses, including the clinical treatment response. Whereas no clear associations of A. ignavus infections with predisposing factors was found, outer ear canal stenosis was observed in all 3 patients. This anatomic feature seems to favor the colonization and probably also the infection with this pathogen. However, limited data make it difficult to explicitly establish a causal link between both conditions. Thus, additional studies or case series of a larger number of patients, including a control group of patients with ear canal stenosis and no clinical symptoms suggestive of acute inflammation, would be necessary to distinguish between colonization and infection.

According to Yassin et al. (1), A. ignavus is usually susceptible to β-lactam antimicrobial drugs, whereas Bernard et al. (2) reported resistance to cefepime. Such discrepancies might partially be explained by different antimicrobial testing methods, which underscores the need for coordinating testing recommendations for rare bacteria such as A. ignavus. Particular attention should be paid to our observation of ciprofloxacin resistance in all isolates, a finding that is consistent with the report by Bernard et al. (2).

Ciprofloxacin ear drops are commonly prescribed in clinical practice. Although MICs enable only limited conclusions on the clinical effectiveness of local antimicrobial drug therapy, we suggest that patients with therapeutic failure after empiric topical treatment with ciprofloxacin ear drops should be assessed for A. ignavus by using microbiological tests. The clinical suspicion should be reported to the microbiology laboratory because there is a serious risk of overlooking A. ignavus caused by its morphologic similarity to bacterial species belonging to the residential skin flora.

No specific request for an in-depth analysis was made by the treating clinicians in the cases we describe. Thus, increased awareness among the clinical microbiologists was caused by the repeated receipt of ear swab specimens from the patients with the clinical information otorrhea in context with the bacterial growth of presumed physiologic flora in large quantities, which led to a low threshold to submit bacterial colonies to additional testing for species identification. Finally, the absence of A. ignavus in matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry databases poses an additional threat to correct identification in the clinical microbiology laboratory, as has been reported for other pathogens (4).

In conclusion, A. ignavus is a novel, potentially underrecognized pathogen that seems to be associated with a distinct clinical pattern in patients with ear infections. A high level of disease awareness and accurate microbiological diagnostics are required for correct identification. In patients who have a clinical course of chronic external otitis and who do not respond to empirical treatment with quinolone ear drops, Auritidibacter infection should be considered and further investigated.

Top

References

  1. Microbiology Society. Auritidibacter ignavus gen. nov., sp. nov., of the family Micrococcaceae isolated from an ear swab of a man with otitis externa, transfer of the members of the family Yaniellaceae Li et al. 2008 to the family Micrococcaceae and emended description of the suborder Micrococcineae [cited 2023 Feb 24]. https://www.microbiologyresearch.org/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijs.0.019786-0#tab2
  2. Bernard  KA, Pacheco  AL, Burdz  T, Wiebe  D, Beniac  DR, Hiebert  SL, et al. Emendation of the Genus Auritidibacter Yassin et al. 2011 and Auritidibacter ignavus Yassin et al. 2011 based on features observed from Canadian and Swiss clinical isolates and whole-genome sequencing analysis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2020;70:838. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Seth-Smith  HMB, Goldenberger  D, Bernard  KA, Bernier  AM, Egli  A. Complete genome assembly of an Auritidibacter ignavus isolate obtained from an ear infection in Switzerland and a comparison to global isolates. Microbiol Resour Announc. 2019;8:e0029119. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen  XF, Hou  X, Xiao  M, Zhang  L, Cheng  JW, Zhou  ML, et al. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) analysis for the identification of pathogenic microorganisms: a review. Microorganisms. 2021;9:1536. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figures
Table

Top

Follow Up

Earning CME Credit

To obtain credit, you should first read the journal article. After reading the article, you should be able to answer the following, related, multiple-choice questions. To complete the questions (with a minimum 75% passing score) and earn continuing medical education (CME) credit, please go to https://www.medscape.org/journal/eid. Credit cannot be obtained for tests completed on paper, although you may use the worksheet below to keep a record of your answers.

You must be a registered user on http://www.medscape.org. If you are not registered on http://www.medscape.org, please click on the “Register” link on the right hand side of the website.

Only one answer is correct for each question. Once you successfully answer all post-test questions, you will be able to view and/or print your certificate. For questions regarding this activity, contact the accredited provider, CME@medscape.net. For technical assistance, contact CME@medscape.net. American Medical Association’s Physician’s Recognition Award (AMA PRA) credits are accepted in the US as evidence of participation in CME activities. For further information on this award, please go to https://www.ama-assn.org. The AMA has determined that physicians not licensed in the US who participate in this CME activity are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Through agreements that the AMA has made with agencies in some countries, AMA PRA credit may be acceptable as evidence of participation in CME activities. If you are not licensed in the US, please complete the questions online, print the AMA PRA CME credit certificate, and present it to your national medical association for review.

Article Title: 
Auritidibacter ignavus, an Emerging Pathogen Associated with Chronic Ear Infections
CME Questions
  • Which of the following statements regarding the microbiology of Auritidibacter ignavus is most accurate?

    • It is an aerobic, gram-positive cocci

    • It is an aerobic, gram-positive rod

    • It is an anaerobic, gram-negative cocci

    • It is an aerobic, gram-negative rod

  • Which of the following risk factors for A. ignavus otitis was most salient among the 3 cases in the current study?

    • Immunocompromised status

    • Male sex

    • Multiple prior episodes of otitis media

    • None of the above

  • A. ignavus otitis was most associated with resistance to which of the following antibiotics in the current study?

    • Ciprofloxacin

    • Amoxicillin/clavulanate

    • Azithromycin

    • Gentamicin

  • Which of the following physical findings was noted in all 3 cases of A. ignavus otitis in the current study?

    • Spore formation on the tympanic membrane

    • Pre-auricular and postauricular lymphadenopathy

    • Temperature greater than 38.5 °C on clinical presentation

    • Stenosis of the external auditory canal

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid3001.230385

Original Publication Date: December 20, 2023

Related Links

Table of Contents – Volume 30, Number 1—January 2024

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Sophie Roth, Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Saarland University, Kirrberger Strasse, Bldg 43, Homburg 66421, Germany

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: November 01, 2023
Page updated: December 20, 2023
Page reviewed: December 20, 2023
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external