User talk:Zyksnowy

如果要收录一个项目，基本上需要有陈述连接到其他项目来表示项目的内容和用途，并且有相关维基百科连接支持，或者有可靠来源支持。Deryck Chan (talk) 13:28, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

說的是 扣扣飞车手游版 （Q55333373）么。。騰訊的遊戲應該有可靠来源--Zyksnowy (talk) 13:45, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

笼统说的，没有特别指任何一个项目。Deryck Chan (talk) 17:04, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

这个网站不是一个测试站，沙盒一般只应该用于和维基数据相关的用途；和维基数据无关的测试请前往测试维基进行。另外请不要把其他网站的内容复制到这里来，在任何页面存放任何非自由版权的内容都是侵权行为。--GZWDer (talk) 16:04, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

再说一遍，请不要在维基数据存放和维基数据无关的内容或进行没有意义的编辑，谢谢--GZWDer (talk) 16:46, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

沙盒的版权问题我顾不上啦。。有些是稍纵即逝的信息。有也是我自己的话。。。。。你看不过去就把某个版本号去删掉好啦。。 Zyksnowy (talk) 15:57, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

任何内容只要不是明确以自由版权释放，就是有版权的而且不能任意商业使用从而不能放在这里。如果你想存放文本文档，请用Pastebin.com或类似服务。--GZWDer (talk) 00:36, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

請不要再在你的用戶名字空間裡剪貼與編輯維基項目無關的內容。否則管理員可能封禁你的帳戶以示警戒[1]。Deryck Chan (talk) 13:08, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Deryck Chan:還有這種封禁方針麼，放著一大堆英語不翻譯也要來審查我麼。--Zyksnowy (talk) 13:26, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

在方针没有明确说明的时候应该使用常识，例如中文版zh:Wikipedia:用戶頁#我的用户页上不可以放什么内容？就要求“避免在用戶頁上放置大量和維基百科無關的資料”和“您的用戶頁不是一個個人網頁”。另外侵权内容在任何维基媒体计划都是不允许的，因为大部分维基媒体计划所有文字内容都根据“知识共享 署名-相同方式共享 3.0协议”（简称CC-BY-SA-3.0）发布，您把受一般版权保护的内容发表到这里的话，您就侵犯了版权持有人的权利。对于维基数据，所有文本名字空间也是CC-BY-SA-3.0，而主名字空间（像Q123之类）等数据名字空间则是更严格的CC0，也就是有版权保护的（即使是自由版权）的内容都不能复制到主名字空间，只有按法律不受保护的（例如著作权法规定单纯事实性信息不受著作权保护）内容可以放到主名字空间。--GZWDer (talk) 13:43, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Zyksnowy,

I saw your changes on [2] and [3]. The Dutch word 'Doline' is borrowed from the Crotian and Slovenian word 'Dolina'. In Dutch it refers to a special form of a 'Zinkgat', which makes it definitely not the same. The Dutch word 'Verdwijngat' refers to another phenomena.

The Doline/Doline comes back in many languages as a special form of a sinkhole. There are many sinkholes that are not a doline, through dolines are sinkholes. Just like an oak and a tree.

I will restore the changes you made, as you are not referring to the right terms here.

Greetings, RonnieV (talk) 12:00, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. During this time, I have noticed that you are adding links to Chinese market Sj.qq.com, what has this platform got to do with Google Play Store? Is that kind of possible spam from your part or ...? Kirilloparma (talk) 11:48, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese market sj.qq.com's database is a Copyright infringement and mirror site to google play's database[4][5].
because of The Great Firewall of China,some software belong to tencent self,it should Legitimacy --Zyksnowy (talk) 11:57, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So then:

1) Sj.qq.com is copyright infringement. That's right, if sj.qq.com is copyright infringement, so why are you inserting it into the Google Play property? It should be done the new property apart from Google Play, called Sj.qq.com ID. You can do it here, to propose a new property.

2) Because of The Great Firewall of China some software belong to tencent self - What does it mean and is there any reliable source to confirm that?

3) it should Legitimacy - Should? Any source to confirm that?

Anyway, I suggest you to no longer insert links to the Chinese market Sj.qq.com, because it does not inspire confidence due to possible spam site, and you don’t need to add links to Google Play property cause it makes no sense, plus the links that you provide doesn't work. Sincerely Kirilloparma (talk) 12:55, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:52, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

当时的真实想法是 为了跟英语维基百科保持同步。。中文維基的Template:Ill也是重定向到Template:Interlanguage link multi。。是我唐突了--Zyksnowy (talk) 13:46, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

谢谢，你没有做错什么，只是因为历史记录没有找到理由就询问一下，打扰了。--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 10:09, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zyksnowy,

I noticed your edits on Q837, none is suitable for the property you are trying. Please use Q4115189 for experiments instead. --- Jura 15:00, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ohh....the link is truth in last editon..not sandbox.
Some edits are drafts of another page in same topic, plase don't worry. . I will clear them before the finsh edit.--Zyksnowy (talk) 17:13, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I don’t understand your revert on computer model (Q55990535). “Model of a computer” may not be the most descriptive sentence, but as I mentioned in my edit-summary, “Descriptions are always helpful” as edit-hints for disambiguation: otherwise, when trying to fill-in that value, it’s hard to know what the item is about.

Can you please clarify why “can't be Descriptions”?

Sincerely,

Jean-Fred (talk) 10:19, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

sorry i don't know about Q29876482 ,,because havent't search//...now ..Disambiguation should be no problem.--Zyksnowy (talk) 10:53, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ZI Jony. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Q15107669 because it didn't appear constructive. Feel free to use the sandbox for test edits. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 13:58, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

the symbol 👽 is alredy presence in [6]before my editon.
it's not a test ..please ignore the tag--Zyksnowy (talk) 14:11, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add symbol. Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 14:17, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

个人认为人物作为事件的别名并不合适，应当可以考虑建立单独的数据项。维基数据的关注度并非和维基百科一样严格。—Siyuwj (talk) 05:09, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

當然可以。。。通过这个页面你就可以建立啦
我最開始建立這個數據項的時候。。。我以为是一个中等关注度的案子。。。。热门的案子我不太擅长处理，因为需要筛选信息--Zyksnowy (talk) 05:14, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Mys 721tx. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Q44571 because it didn't appear constructive. Feel free to use the sandbox for test edits. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Mys 721tx (talk) 15:03, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

不應該把"Phabricator"翻成"混血藥",那個"Phabricator"應該是Phabricator (Q16509734)--林勇智 13:51, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@D2513850:謝謝提醒，但 我會繼續翻譯Phabricator (Q16509734)...--Zyksnowy (talk) 17:17, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

我就直说了吧，当初这么创建就是定好的不作为完整的季度条目来使用的。--Dabao qian (talk) 17:23, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

維基是一個開放的地方。。。當你決定作為不完整的時候，，，別人就有權，來寫一個完整的。。。我不打算刪掉您的貢獻，，，但你不要刪掉豆瓣的信息啊。--Zyksnowy (talk) 17:25, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

如果要收录一个项目，基本上需要有陈述连接到其他项目来表示项目的内容和用途，并且有相关维基百科连接支持，或者有可靠来源支持。Deryck Chan (talk) 13:28, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

說的是 扣扣飞车手游版 （Q55333373）么。。騰訊的遊戲應該有可靠来源--Zyksnowy (talk) 13:45, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

笼统说的，没有特别指任何一个项目。Deryck Chan (talk) 17:04, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

这个网站不是一个测试站，沙盒一般只应该用于和维基数据相关的用途；和维基数据无关的测试请前往测试维基进行。另外请不要把其他网站的内容复制到这里来，在任何页面存放任何非自由版权的内容都是侵权行为。--GZWDer (talk) 16:04, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

再说一遍，请不要在维基数据存放和维基数据无关的内容或进行没有意义的编辑，谢谢--GZWDer (talk) 16:46, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

沙盒的版权问题我顾不上啦。。有些是稍纵即逝的信息。有也是我自己的话。。。。。你看不过去就把某个版本号去删掉好啦。。 Zyksnowy (talk) 15:57, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

任何内容只要不是明确以自由版权释放，就是有版权的而且不能任意商业使用从而不能放在这里。如果你想存放文本文档，请用Pastebin.com或类似服务。--GZWDer (talk) 00:36, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

請不要再在你的用戶名字空間裡剪貼與編輯維基項目無關的內容。否則管理員可能封禁你的帳戶以示警戒[7]。Deryck Chan (talk) 13:08, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Deryck Chan:還有這種封禁方針麼，放著一大堆英語不翻譯也要來審查我麼。--Zyksnowy (talk) 13:26, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

在方针没有明确说明的时候应该使用常识，例如中文版zh:Wikipedia:用戶頁#我的用户页上不可以放什么内容？就要求“避免在用戶頁上放置大量和維基百科無關的資料”和“您的用戶頁不是一個個人網頁”。另外侵权内容在任何维基媒体计划都是不允许的，因为大部分维基媒体计划所有文字内容都根据“知识共享 署名-相同方式共享 3.0协议”（简称CC-BY-SA-3.0）发布，您把受一般版权保护的内容发表到这里的话，您就侵犯了版权持有人的权利。对于维基数据，所有文本名字空间也是CC-BY-SA-3.0，而主名字空间（像Q123之类）等数据名字空间则是更严格的CC0，也就是有版权保护的（即使是自由版权）的内容都不能复制到主名字空间，只有按法律不受保护的（例如著作权法规定单纯事实性信息不受著作权保护）内容可以放到主名字空间。--GZWDer (talk) 13:43, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Zyksnowy,

I saw your changes on [8] and [9]. The Dutch word 'Doline' is borrowed from the Crotian and Slovenian word 'Dolina'. In Dutch it refers to a special form of a 'Zinkgat', which makes it definitely not the same. The Dutch word 'Verdwijngat' refers to another phenomena.

The Doline/Doline comes back in many languages as a special form of a sinkhole. There are many sinkholes that are not a doline, through dolines are sinkholes. Just like an oak and a tree.

I will restore the changes you made, as you are not referring to the right terms here.

Greetings, RonnieV (talk) 12:00, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. During this time, I have noticed that you are adding links to Chinese market Sj.qq.com, what has this platform got to do with Google Play Store? Is that kind of possible spam from your part or ...? Kirilloparma (talk) 11:48, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese market sj.qq.com's database is a Copyright infringement and mirror site to google play's database[10][11].
because of The Great Firewall of China,some software belong to tencent self,it should Legitimacy --Zyksnowy (talk) 11:57, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So then:

1) Sj.qq.com is copyright infringement. That's right, if sj.qq.com is copyright infringement, so why are you inserting it into the Google Play property? It should be done the new property apart from Google Play, called Sj.qq.com ID. You can do it here, to propose a new property.

2) Because of The Great Firewall of China some software belong to tencent self - What does it mean and is there any reliable source to confirm that?

3) it should Legitimacy - Should? Any source to confirm that?

Anyway, I suggest you to no longer insert links to the Chinese market Sj.qq.com, because it does not inspire confidence due to possible spam site, and you don’t need to add links to Google Play property cause it makes no sense, plus the links that you provide doesn't work. Sincerely Kirilloparma (talk) 12:55, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:52, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

当时的真实想法是 为了跟英语维基百科保持同步。。中文維基的Template:Ill也是重定向到Template:Interlanguage link multi。。是我唐突了--Zyksnowy (talk) 13:46, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

谢谢，你没有做错什么，只是因为历史记录没有找到理由就询问一下，打扰了。--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 10:09, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zyksnowy,

I noticed your edits on Q837, none is suitable for the property you are trying. Please use Q4115189 for experiments instead. --- Jura 15:00, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ohh....the link is truth in last editon..not sandbox.
Some edits are drafts of another page in same topic, plase don't worry. . I will clear them before the finsh edit.--Zyksnowy (talk) 17:13, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I don’t understand your revert on computer model (Q55990535). “Model of a computer” may not be the most descriptive sentence, but as I mentioned in my edit-summary, “Descriptions are always helpful” as edit-hints for disambiguation: otherwise, when trying to fill-in that value, it’s hard to know what the item is about.

Can you please clarify why “can't be Descriptions”?

Sincerely,

Jean-Fred (talk) 10:19, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

sorry i don't know about Q29876482 ,,because havent't search//...now ..Disambiguation should be no problem.--Zyksnowy (talk) 10:53, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ZI Jony. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Q15107669 because it didn't appear constructive. Feel free to use the sandbox for test edits. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 13:58, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

the symbol 👽 is alredy presence in [12]before my editon.
it's not a test ..please ignore the tag--Zyksnowy (talk) 14:11, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add symbol. Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 14:17, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

个人认为人物作为事件的别名并不合适，应当可以考虑建立单独的数据项。维基数据的关注度并非和维基百科一样严格。—Siyuwj (talk) 05:09, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

當然可以。。。通过这个页面你就可以建立啦
我最開始建立這個數據項的時候。。。我以为是一个中等关注度的案子。。。。热门的案子我不太擅长处理，因为需要筛选信息--Zyksnowy (talk) 05:14, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Mys 721tx. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Q44571 because it didn't appear constructive. Feel free to use the sandbox for test edits. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Mys 721tx (talk) 15:03, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

不應該把"Phabricator"翻成"混血藥",那個"Phabricator"應該是Phabricator (Q16509734)--林勇智 13:51, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@D2513850:謝謝提醒，但 我會繼續翻譯Phabricator (Q16509734)...--Zyksnowy (talk) 17:17, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

我就直说了吧，当初这么创建就是定好的不作为完整的季度条目来使用的。--Dabao qian (talk) 17:23, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

維基是一個開放的地方。。。當你決定作為不完整的時候，，，別人就有權，來寫一個完整的。。。我不打算刪掉您的貢獻，，，但你不要刪掉豆瓣的信息啊。--Zyksnowy (talk) 17:25, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

那个不是应该放到这里的啊，要不就别用，要不就主条目放三个链接进去。--Dabao qian (talk) 17:26, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

好，我放主條目。。。。青山不改，後會有期--Zyksnowy (talk) 17:28, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

不是放到这里啊，一、二、三季是三个不同的链接，扔到本地去。--Dabao qian (talk) 17:40, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zyksnowy,

When participating (or not) in discussions on talk pages, please don't edit other users' comments. --- Jura 22:53, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

我们可不可以不要把一个属性翻译的名字过长？这样有什么用？这只会让最终用户害怕而误导性避免使用这个属性，这与维基数据的初衷背道而驰。--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 06:44, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Liuxinyu970226:在不保留英文的前提下，我做不到--Zyksnowy (talk) 05:50, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

中文标签又不是说不能有英文字母，维基百科条目名都允许英文字母。--GZWDer (talk) 07:49, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• 请注意翻译的可读性，例如这里你的翻译属于拙劣翻译
• 网站和软件名称一般是专有名词，如果没有常用的中文名（例如这里），或者中文中常用原文（例如这里，这个情况下一般要和维基百科条目名保持一致）请保留原文

--GZWDer (talk) 07:46, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

事實上，我在看到這個條目之前根本不知道這款軟件。。縱然是專有名詞又有何意義。。。。我還是想翻譯成中醫

• Epic Games (Q739711)，中文中常用“Epic Games”，不常用“英佩游戏”
• Steam (Q337535)，中文中常用“Steam”，而“蒸汽平台”特指该平台的中国大陆版本
• Steam application ID (P1733)，同上，请注意“蒸汽动力”是个论坛，现已更名为“其乐”
• IGN (Q207708)，中文常用“IGN”，没人用“想像游戏网”
• Giant Bomb (Q1657282)，中文中常用“Giant Bomb”，不常用“巨人炸弹”“巨型炸弹”
• Giant Bomb ID (P5247)，同上

这些名词，请保持英文原文，不要胡乱翻译成中文，你翻译完了之后大部分人都看不懂，也没有其他人用这些中文名。如果你不知道大部分人用什么名字称呼他们，就不要动他们。似乎我不是第一个这么提醒你的，大概也不是最后一个。如果我的提醒没有效果，我可能会去举报破坏行为。Xzonn2000 (talk) 02:22, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

我认真回答你一下，在中国有子公司，或者“被经常被中文媒体报道的在中国没有直接业务的游戏公司”都可以有相应的中文名，即使中文名不常用，这不是你删除中文名的理由--Zyksnowy (talk) 07:39, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:NewItem Yue (talk) 18:55, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

很抱歉打扰你了，五年前帮我合并项目的好心人………………--Zyksnowy (talk) 19:42, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]