User talk:Gelli1742
Nothing has been worth to be discussed so far, I'm afraid, ain't I?
TERC municipality code (P1653) is ready. Thank you for proposing the property. --Tobias1984 (talk) 12:10, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
P131
[edit]Hi, please don't add more redundant P131 statements until it's clear if we have to avoid redundant information or not. I have spent a lot of time clearing this information for Catalonia municipalities because I have always understood that only immediate above administrative unit for each item has to be stated. Thanks. --Quico (talk) 21:45, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Understood, will do so - thanks & kind regards Gelli1742 (talk) 21:51, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you for your understanding and kindness. --Quico (talk) 12:01, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Population reference
[edit]Hi! Some Wikipedias retrive population data from Wikidata with references. So it would be appreciated if you didn't add "imported from Wikipedia" references to population data as self-references are generally avoided on Wikipedias. 90.190.58.243 14:52, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- So where do they get their information then? Anyway, anybody is welcome regarding Wikidata as kind of leading within the Wikipedias. Gelli1742 (talk) 18:02, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Founded
[edit]RE:[1] Sources please!
Municipalities as a concept was founded in Sweden in the 1860's. And no municipality of modern type is older than 1971. -- Innocent bystander (talk) 10:59, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
- thx - it's fixed now as I mixed up the municipality (founded 1971) with its tatört (founded 1621). Gelli1742 (talk) 11:37, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
- Good, "Tätort" is a statistical definition of "populated place". It is not always the same thing as the thing that was founded in 1621, but it is close enough. -- Innocent bystander (talk) 12:58, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
- thx - it's fixed now as I mixed up the municipality (founded 1971) with its tatört (founded 1621). Gelli1742 (talk) 11:37, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
[edit]Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.[survey 1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.[survey 2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.
Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:36, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- ↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
- ↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
[edit](Sorry to write in Engilsh)
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.
About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:19, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
[edit]Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.
Thank you!
Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey
[edit]Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.
If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!
Faulty interpretation
[edit]Hello! These edits are based on a faulty interpretation: the text states that (p. 27) "Twin & Partner cities" means twin cities and partner cities, and I see that you listed all the cities as twin cities. Unfortunately, all these edits must be withdrawn. Pallor (talk) 15:22, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your post, though I'm not sure, if I got you right. Some differ between both types of collobaration others don't. Is there any separating attribute for drawing the full picture? In the meantime I'll try to stop adding sister city agreements of friendship type. Kind regards Gelli1742 (talk) 18:21, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- A twin city and a partner city are obviously not the same, as they are called differently. The source you posted does not clarify which cities are partners and which are sister to Tbilisi, so it is not suitable to source the P190 feature. Another source must be sought, and the entries made so far must be corrected. Pallor (talk) 21:09, 18 June 2024 (UTC)