Talk:Q128499
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Autodescription — Yalta (Q128499)
description: city in Crimea
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “Yalta” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
- Generic queries for administrative territorial entities
This list of queries is designed for all instances of administrative territorial entity (Q56061). It is generated using {{TP administrative area}}.
- Places in Yalta (query)
- Map of places in Yalta (query)
- List of monuments (Monumental (Q29167605))
- List of places ordered by altitude (query) (elevation above sea level (P2044))
- Count of buildings by architectural style (query)
- List of highest buildings (query) (height (P2048))
- Organizations with headquarters in Yalta (query)
- List of items which have power over or which apply to Yalta (query) (applies to jurisdiction (P1001))
- People born in Yalta, sorted by number of sitelinks (query)
- Main occupation of people born in Yalta (query)
- People dead in Yalta, sorted by number of sitelinks (query) (place of death (P20))
- People buried in Yalta, sorted by number of sitelinks (query) (place of burial (P119))
- People living in Yalta, sorted by number of sitelinks (query) (residence (P551))
- List of items with narrative location in Yalta (query) (narrative location (P840))
- List of movies with filming location in Yalta (query) (filming location (P915))
- See also: Wikidata:WikiProject Country subdivision
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
Periods continuity
[edit]Hi @Infovarius:. I see a potential problem with splitting of 1991- period into two: I don't know which way is simpler for clients to render periods list. I'll think about this. --AS (talk) 22:08, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
- Let's say China claim it's part of Russia since 2018. Will you split into 1991-2014, 2014-2018, 2018- now? --AS (talk) 22:12, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
- The problem is that we haven't qualifiers on qualifiers. So probably yes, we would split further. Alternative variant is to use different versions of full-time values: 1) "Ukraine from 1991" disputed by Russia; 2) "Ukraine 1991-2014" without qualifiers; 3) "Russia from 2014" disputed by Ukraine; 4(if necessary) "Russia from 2018" supported by China. Here we will add a new value for each new international claim. --Infovarius (talk) 00:17, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
- Still bad. Now we have claim "Ukraine, end time 2014" which semantically should have "disputed by Ukraine" qualifier. Which will also dispute "Ukraine, start time 2014" claim. I'll need to check data model to understand desired format. --AS (talk) 22:14, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- The problem is that we haven't qualifiers on qualifiers. So probably yes, we would split further. Alternative variant is to use different versions of full-time values: 1) "Ukraine from 1991" disputed by Russia; 2) "Ukraine 1991-2014" without qualifiers; 3) "Russia from 2014" disputed by Ukraine; 4(if necessary) "Russia from 2018" supported by China. Here we will add a new value for each new international claim. --Infovarius (talk) 00:17, 10 May 2020 (UTC)