Wikidata:Property proposal/district heating
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
district heating grid
[edit]Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Place
Description | district heating (or cooling) grid of region/locality connecting producers and residential or commercial consumers in the area |
---|---|
Represents | district heating (Q278784) |
Data type | Item |
Example 1 | Vienna (Q1741) → Fernwärme Wien (Q105687065): district heating system in Vienna, Austria |
Example 2 | Paris (Q90) → réseau de chaleur urbain CPCU (Q105687036): district heating system in Paris, France |
Example 3 | Ivry-sur-Seine (Q193877) → réseau de chaleur urbain CPCU (Q105687036): district heating system in Paris, France |
Example 4 | Berlin (Q64) → Berliner Fernwärmenetz (Q105687045): district heating system in Berlin, Germany |
Planned use | add from w:District_heating#National_variation |
Motivation
[edit]It seems we have plenty of information about transportation infrastructure, but lack data on more basic parts of infrastructure, such as the above. Generally, there would be one value per neighborhood or region. This should simplify finding a relevant grid for a given location (Add your motivation for this property here.) --- Jura 21:46, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Notified participants of WikiProject Energy --- Jura 21:47, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Discussion
[edit]- Comment Thinking ahead to the concept of a water, electricity, gas, telecommunications, etc grid/network--perhaps a more generic "area serviced by infrastructure network" property could be proposed? Similar to the idea of transport network (P16) which is used for linking roads to road networks. --Dhx1 (talk) 23:05, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Is there an advantage in combining them and making it multi-valued, with or without transport network (P16)? --- Jura 23:20, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- A combined field might be an advantage if we merely list the operator of (one or several) grids in an area (instead of an item about the grid itself as proposed here). Such an approach would be different from what is proposed here. --- Jura 21:59, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
- If not, I'd keep them separate: modeling challenges might differ. BTW, for several aspects of telecom networks properties are already available. --- Jura 09:38, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- Is there an advantage in combining them and making it multi-valued, with or without transport network (P16)? --- Jura 23:20, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support, an important property for heat supply.--Arbnos (talk) 16:47, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Arbnos: created by Epìdosis as district heating grid (P9611) --- Jura 11:53, 27 May 2021 (UTC)