How do authors of systematic reviews deal with research malpractice and misconduct in original studies? A cross-sectional analysis of systematic reviews and survey of their authors (Q35943880)

From Wikidata

Jump to navigation Jump to search

scientific article

Language	Label	Description	Also known as
English	How do authors of systematic reviews deal with research malpractice and misconduct in original studies? A cross-sectional analysis of systematic reviews and survey of their authors	scientific article

Statements

scholarly article

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PMC publication ID

11 August 2017

How do authors of systematic reviews deal with research malpractice and misconduct in original studies? A cross-sectional analysis of systematic reviews and survey of their authors (English)

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PMC publication ID

11 August 2017

systematic review

1 reference

based on heuristic

inferred from title

2

object named as

Erik von Elm

0 references

author name string

Nadia Elia

1

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PMC publication ID

11 August 2017

Alexandra Chatagner

3

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PMC publication ID

11 August 2017

Daniel M Pöpping

4

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PMC publication ID

11 August 2017

Martin R Tramèr

5

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PMC publication ID

11 August 2017

publication date

2 March 2016

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PMC publication ID

11 August 2017

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PMC publication ID

11 August 2017

6

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PMC publication ID

11 August 2017

3

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PMC publication ID

11 August 2017

e010442

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PMC publication ID

11 August 2017

Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Impact of contacting study authors to obtain additional data for systematic reviews: diagnostic accuracy studies for hepatic fibrosis

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Ability of a meta-analysis to prevent redundant research: systematic review of studies on pain from propofol injection

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Fate of articles that warranted retraction due to ethical concerns: a descriptive cross-sectional study

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Financial conflicts of interest and reporting bias regarding the association between sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: a systematic review of systematic reviews

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Meta-analysis of secure randomised controlled trials of β-blockade to prevent perioperative death in non-cardiac surgery

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Restoring invisible and abandoned trials: a call for people to publish the findings

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

The codex of science: honesty, precision, and truth--and its violations

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Differences in reporting of analyses in internal company documents versus published trial reports: comparisons in industry-sponsored trials in off-label uses of gabapentin

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Industry sponsorship and research outcome

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Out of sight but not out of mind: how to search for unpublished clinical trial evidence

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Effect of reporting bias on meta-analyses of drug trials: reanalysis of meta-analyses

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

The role of Cochrane Review authors in exposing research and publication misconduct

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

How the case against the MMR vaccine was fixed

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Ethics in systematic reviews

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Reboxetine for acute treatment of major depression: systematic review and meta-analysis of published and unpublished placebo and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor controlled trials

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Susceptibility to fraud in systematic reviews: lessons from the Reuben case

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Reporting bias in drug trials submitted to the Food and Drug Administration: review of publication and presentation

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Systematic reviewers commonly contact study authors but do so with limited rigor

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Selective Publication of Antidepressant Trials and Its Influence on Apparent Efficacy

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Source of funding and results of studies of health effects of mobile phone use: systematic review of experimental studies

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

What have we learnt from Vioxx?

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Scientists behaving badly

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Retrieval of missing data for meta-analysis: a practical example

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Assessing ethics of trials in systematic reviews

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Different patterns of duplicate publication: an analysis of articles used in systematic reviews

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Evidence b(i)ased medicine--selective reporting from studies sponsored by pharmaceutical industry: review of studies in new drug applications

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a systematic review

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Should unpublished data be included in meta-analyses? Current convictions and controversies

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

2 October 2017

Why should clinical trials be registered?

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

24 September 2018

The Boldt debacle

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4785311

24 September 2018

Identifiers

10.1136/BMJOPEN-2015-010442

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PMC publication ID

11 August 2017

PMC publication ID

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PMC publication ID

11 August 2017

PubMed publication ID

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PMC publication ID

11 August 2017

ResearchGate publication ID

0 references

Sitelinks

Wikipedia(0 entries)

Wikibooks(0 entries)

Wikinews(0 entries)

Wikiquote(0 entries)

Wikisource(0 entries)

Wikiversity(0 entries)

Wikivoyage(0 entries)

Wiktionary(0 entries)

Multilingual sites(0 entries)

Retrieved from "https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q35943880&oldid=1618024957"