Property talk:P5973

Allowed entity types are Wikibase sense (Q54285715): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P5973#Entity types

Scope is as main value (Q54828448): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)

List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P5973#Scope, hourly updated report, SPARQL

Conflicts with “subclass of (P279)”: this property must not be used with the listed properties and values. (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P5973#Conflicts with P279, search, SPARQL

Symmetric property: if [item A] has this property linked to [item B], then [item B] should also have this property linked to [item A]. (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P5973#Symmetric, SPARQL

Synonym senses can't be equivalent to different items
if sense Asynonym (P5973)sense B, then the value of sense Aitem for this sense (P5137) and the value of sense Bitem for this sense (P5137) should be the same. (Help)
Violations query: SELECT ?item ?senseB WHERE { ?item wdt:P5973 ?senseB . ?item wdt:P5137 ?itemForSenseA . ?senseB wdt:P5137 ?itemForSenseB . FILTER (?itemForSenseA != ?itemForSenseB) }
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Complex constraint violations/P5973#Synonym senses can't be equivalent to different items

@fnielsen: I tried adding this to succé (L314778) and searched for both "framgång" and L32174 and none of them worked.--So9q (talk) 07:42, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@So9q: The value for synonym (P5973) must be a sense. It cannot be a lexeme. Perhaps that is the problem? — Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen) (talk) 21:46, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]