Property talk:P352

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Documentation

UniProt protein ID
identifier for a protein per the UniProt database
DescriptionThe UniProt identifier for the protein product of a gene
Associated itemUniProt (Q905695)
Applicable "stated in" valueUniProt (Q905695)
Data typeExternal identifier
Corresponding templateTemplate:UniProt (Q11138265)
Template parameter"UniProt" from en:Template:GNF Protein box or equivalents, Template:GNF Protein box (Q14412152)
Domain
According to this template: Genes/Proteins - subclasses of protein (Q8054)
According to statements in the property:
protein (Q8054) or peptide (Q172847)
When possible, data should only be stored as statements
Allowed values([OPQ][0-9][A-Z0-9]|[A-NR-Z][0-9][A-Z])[A-Z0-9][A-Z0-9][0-9]([A-Z][A-Z0-9][A-Z0-9][0-9])? (6 alphanumeric characters, possibly suffixed by 4 more, all uppercase; both groups start with a letter and end with a digit.)
Examplereelin (Q13561329)P78509 (RDF)
titin (Q74314)Q8WZ42 (RDF)
Sourcehttp://mygene.info
Formatter URLhttps://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/$1
Tracking: sameno label (Q32085177)
Tracking: differencesno label (Q32185197)
Tracking: usageCategory:Pages using Wikidata property P352 (Q32185210)
Tracking: local yes, WD nono label (Q32185224)
See alsoUniProt disease ID (P11430), UniProt journal ID (P4616)
Lists
Proposal discussionProposal discussion
Current uses
Total2,538,681
Main statement625,36924.6% of uses
Qualifier8,9040.4% of uses
Reference1,904,40875% of uses
Search for values
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Format “([OPQ]\d\d|[A-Z]\d[A-Z])[A-Z\d][A-Z\d]\d([A-Z][A-Z\d]{2}\d)?: value must be formatted using this pattern (PCRE syntax). (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P352#Format, hourly updated report, SPARQL
Distinct values: this property likely contains a value that is different from all other items. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P352#Unique value, SPARQL (every item), SPARQL (by value)
Single value: this property generally contains a single value. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P352#Single value, SPARQL
Type “protein (Q8054), peptide (Q172847): item must contain property “instance of (P31), subclass of (P279)” with classes “protein (Q8054), peptide (Q172847)” or their subclasses (defined using subclass of (P279)). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P352#Type Q8054, Q172847, SPARQL
Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P352#Entity types
Scope is as main value (Q54828448), as reference (Q54828450): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P352#Scope, SPARQL

Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.)

question

[edit]

I suppose there are both a human and a mouse ID? How do we distinguish? — Fnielsen (talk) 14:44, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Any UniProt ID (and any protein in nature, for that matter) is associated with a specific taxon so they are already "distinguished". Wikidata proteins having a UniProt ID therefore should also have a "found in taxon" statement. If you want to make a generic protein item this is then the same as a protein family. --SCIdude (talk) 08:10, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

UniProt taxonomy

[edit]

UniProt (Q905695) also offers a taxonomic database, see Template:UniProt Taxonomy (Q14444500). It is meant for instances of taxon (Q16521), but is uses all-numeric IDs, such as Nymphon stroemi (Q2320595) => 511525. Should this be handled by a different property? LaddΩ chat ;) 12:16, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so (and the bot devs apparently don't either). Our "found in taxon" uses the WikiSpecies tree of life, and if you find taxa in UniProt not covered here, our tree should be augmented. --SCIdude (talk) 08:14, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

URL Pattern =

[edit]

The url pattern currently uses www.uniprot.org but for wikidata this should be purl.uniprot.org. Changing this would make it easier for doing queries from sparql.uniprot.org into wikidata without conversion.  – The preceding unsigned comment was added by 129.194.231.5 (talk • contribs).

UniProt vs UniProtKB

[edit]

In the GO consortium we changed our prefix from UniProt to UniProtKB several years ago, on request of UniProt. See GO Prefix registry entry. I prefer the simpler UniProt as a prefix, but we are locked into UniProtKB in GO. Should we register this as a synonym prefix in Wikidata? Cmungall (talk) 02:03, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

UniProt Identifier Versus UniProt Accession

[edit]

Currently, the example on this page (RELN) is neither a UniProt entry name (which would be RELN_HUMAN) or a UniProt Accession (which would be P78509). The regular expression provided on the page is actually for UniProt Accessions, not identifiers (see here). Basically, this page should be split for UniProt entry names and UniProt accession numbers. For more on this difference and split see official documentation here.

Splitting would not be as intended, the intended use of this property is for accessions, as this allows also linking to UniProt. The example actually linked to the gene item, which I fixed. --SCIdude (talk) 14:47, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]