| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <julien(dot)rouhaud(at)dalibo(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stefan Huehner <stefan(at)huehner(dot)org>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg9.6 segfault using simple query (related to use fk for join estimates) |
| Date: | 2016-06-02 18:29:34 |
| Message-ID: | 5234.1464892174@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> FYI, I spoke to Tom Lane about this at PGCon and suggested that he
> look at the proposed patch as I requested in
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+TgmobPqrAVXOBMHTcpDq8hX7gCzcVhoUvC8s9V=d09+bt30w@mail.gmail.com
> and see whether that would address his concerns, and he said that he
> would do that. It may, however, have slipped his mind.
Not entirely, though I've been wrapped up in pg_dump fixes for the last
little while. I'll get to this soon.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-06-02 18:57:35 | Re: Redesigning parallel dump/restore's wait-for-workers logic |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-06-02 18:28:19 | Re: epoll_wait returning EFAULT on Linux 3.2.78 |