[go: up one dir, main page]

Search a number
-
+
5255335529 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1001110010011111…
…00000111001101001
3111120020211201001122
410321033200321221
541230331214104
62225252025025
7244142420633
oct47117407151
914506751048
105255335529
112257555404
121028002175
13659a1b9c2
1437bd69a53
1520b5916be
hex1393e0e69

5255335529 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 5255335530. Its totient is φ = 5255335528.

The previous prime is 5255335523. The next prime is 5255335531. The reversal of 5255335529 is 9255335525.

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 3728323600 + 1527011929 = 61060^2 + 39077^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 5255335529 - 24 = 5255335513 is a prime.

Together with 5255335531, it forms a pair of twin primes.

It is a Chen prime.

It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 5255335529.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (5255335523) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 2627667764 + 2627667765.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (2627667765).

Almost surely, 25255335529 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

5255335529 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

5255335529 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

5255335529 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its digits is 1012500, while the sum is 44.

The square root of 5255335529 is about 72493.6930291181. The cubic root of 5255335529 is about 1738.6018990036.

The spelling of 5255335529 in words is "five billion, two hundred fifty-five million, three hundred thirty-five thousand, five hundred twenty-nine".