Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1010100101101101… |
… | …00010001100110001 |
3 | 112200012022122212101 |
4 | 11102312202030301 |
5 | 43120324313430 |
6 | 2340041100401 |
7 | 260610442024 |
oct | 52266421461 |
9 | 15605278771 |
10 | 5684994865 |
11 | 2458038870 |
12 | 1127a87701 |
13 | 6c7a461b4 |
14 | 3bd0511bb |
15 | 234162dca |
hex | 152da2331 |
5684994865 has 8 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 7442175168. Its totient is φ = 4134541680.
The previous prime is 5684994863. The next prime is 5684994929.
5684994865 is nontrivially palindromic in base 10.
It is a sphenic number, since it is the product of 3 distinct primes.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 5684994865 - 21 = 5684994863 is a prime.
It is a Duffinian number.
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 5684994797 and 5684994806.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (5684994863) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 7 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 51681717 + ... + 51681826.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (930271896).
Almost surely, 25684994865 is an apocalyptic number.
5684994865 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (55) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
5684994865 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1757180303).
5684994865 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
5684994865 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 103363559.
The product of its digits is 74649600, while the sum is 64.
The square root of 5684994865 is about 75398.9049323662. The cubic root of 5684994865 is about 1784.7471299736.
The spelling of 5684994865 in words is "five billion, six hundred eighty-four million, nine hundred ninety-four thousand, eight hundred sixty-five".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.001 sec. • engine limits •