Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10010111010111… |
… | …001010100100000 |
3 | 211010022001202112 |
4 | 102322321110200 |
5 | 1122230212044 |
6 | 51255334452 |
7 | 10603050023 |
oct | 2272712440 |
9 | 733261675 |
10 | 317429024 |
11 | 1531a9140 |
12 | 8a381428 |
13 | 509c0c33 |
14 | 3022d1ba |
15 | 1cd0309e |
hex | 12eb9520 |
317429024 has 24 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 681751728. Its totient is φ = 144285760.
The previous prime is 317428999. The next prime is 317429051. The reversal of 317429024 is 420924713.
317429024 is digitally balanced in base 3, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×3174290242 = 201522370555185152, which contains 22 as substring.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (32).
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 3 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 450542 + ... + 451245.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (28406322).
Almost surely, 2317429024 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
317429024 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (364322704).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
317429024 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
317429024 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 901808 (or 901800 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 12096, while the sum is 32.
The square root of 317429024 is about 17816.5379353004. The cubic root of 317429024 is about 682.1536562937.
The spelling of 317429024 in words is "three hundred seventeen million, four hundred twenty-nine thousand, twenty-four".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.001 sec. • engine limits •