[go: up one dir, main page]

Search a number
-
+
35441101 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1000011100110…
…0100111001101
32110200121001101
42013030213031
533033103401
63303343101
7610146553
oct207144715
973617041
1035441101
1119007473
12ba51a91
13745b787
1449c7bd3
1531a1101
hex21cc9cd

35441101 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 35441102. Its totient is φ = 35441100.

The previous prime is 35441093. The next prime is 35441111. The reversal of 35441101 is 10114453.

35441101 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 22553001 + 12888100 = 4749^2 + 3590^2 .

It is an emirp because it is prime and its reverse (10114453) is a distict prime.

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 35441101 - 23 = 35441093 is a prime.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (35441111) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 17720550 + 17720551.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (17720551).

Almost surely, 235441101 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

35441101 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

35441101 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

35441101 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 240, while the sum is 19.

The square root of 35441101 is about 5953.2428977827. The cubic root of 35441101 is about 328.4750607927.

Adding to 35441101 its reverse (10114453), we get a palindrome (45555554).

The spelling of 35441101 in words is "thirty-five million, four hundred forty-one thousand, one hundred one".