Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 100110101110… |
… | …110010000100 |
3 | 201002211102110 |
4 | 212232302010 |
5 | 10044344332 |
6 | 1001341020 |
7 | 152204565 |
oct | 46566204 |
9 | 21084373 |
10 | 10153092 |
11 | 5805194 |
12 | 3497770 |
13 | 2146461 |
14 | 14c416c |
15 | d584cc |
hex | 9aec84 |
10153092 has 24 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 23782752. Its totient is φ = 3371200.
The previous prime is 10153069. The next prime is 10153093. The reversal of 10153092 is 29035101.
It is a hoax number, since the sum of its digits (21) coincides with the sum of the digits of its distinct prime factors.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (10153093) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (11) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 7 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 1867 + ... + 4877.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (990948).
Almost surely, 210153092 is an apocalyptic number.
10153092 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (12) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
10153092 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (13629660).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
10153092 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
10153092 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 3299 (or 3297 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 270, while the sum is 21.
The square root of 10153092 is about 3186.3916896703. The cubic root of 10153092 is about 216.5373281984.
Adding to 10153092 its reverse (29035101), we get a palindrome (39188193).
The spelling of 10153092 in words is "ten million, one hundred fifty-three thousand, ninety-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.001 sec. • engine limits •