What Is a Passive ETF?
A passive exchange-traded fund (ETF) is a financial instrument that seeks to replicate the performance of the broader equity market or a specific sector or trend. Passive ETFs mirror the holdings of a designated index—a collection of tradable assets deemed to be representative of a particular market or segment. Investors can buy and sell passive ETFs throughout the trading day, just like stocks on a major exchange.
Key Takeaways
- A passive ETF is a vehicle that seeks to replicate the performance of a designated index by holding the assets listed on the index.
- They offer lower expense ratios, increased transparency, and greater tax efficiency than actively managed funds.
- Passive ETFs are subject to total market risk, lack flexibility, and are heavily weighted to the highest-valued stocks in terms of market cap.
How a Passive ETF Works
Components of a passive ETF follow the underlying index or sector and are not at the discretion of a fund manager. That makes it the opposite of active management—a strategy whereby an individual or team makes decisions on the underlying assets in an attempt to beat the market.
Passive ETFs provide investors with greater flexibility to execute a buy-and-hold strategy compared to active funds. Passive investing advocates believe it's difficult to outperform the market, so they aim to match its entire performance rather than beat it.
Taking a hands-off approach means the provider can charge investors less without worrying about the cost of employee salaries, brokerage fees, and research. The strategy also touts the benefit of lower turnover. When assets move in and out of the fund at a slower pace, it leads to fewer transaction costs and realized capital gains. Investors, therefore, can save when it's time to file taxes.
Passive ETFs maximize returns by minimizing buying and selling.
Passive ETFs are also more transparent than their actively managed counterparts. Passive ETF providers publish fund weightings daily, allowing investors to limit strategy drift and identify duplicate investments.
Special Considerations
Passive ETFs have rocketed in popularity since first being introduced to the world in 1993. The low returns posted by actively managed funds and the endorsement of passive investing vehicles by influential figures such as Warren Buffett have led investor cash to flood into passive management.
The SPDR S&P 500 (SPY), launched in January 1993 to track the S&P 500 Index, is the oldest surviving and most widely known ETF.
In August 2019, passive ETFs and mutual funds finally surpassed their active counterparts in assets under management (AUM), according to Morningstar.
Passive ETF vs. Active ETF
Most investors aren't content with betting on every ETF. They specifically want to pick the winners and avoid the laggards. Aspirations of beating the market are common, even though evidence points to most active fund managers regularly failing to achieve this goal.
Active ETFs seek to meet those needs. These vehicles feature many of the same benefits of traditional ETFs, such as price transparency, liquidity, and tax efficiency. Where they differ is that they have a manager installed who can adapt the fund to changing market conditions.
Although active ETFs generally mirror an index like their passive peers, active managers have some leeway to make alterations and deviate from the benchmark when they see fit. Options available to them include changing sector rotation, market-timing trades, short selling, and buying on margin.
Investors shouldn't automatically assume that this flexibility guarantees active ETFs to beat the market and their passive peers. Not every call made will be the right one, plus the tools and employees incur additional costs, resulting in higher expense ratios that reduce the fund's assets and investors' returns.
Criticism of Passive ETFs
Passive ETFs are subject to total market risk because when the overall stock market or bond prices fall, so do funds tracking the index. Another drawback is a lack of flexibility. Providers of these vehicles cannot make changes to portfolios or adopt defensive measures, such as reducing positions on holdings when a sell-off looks inevitable.
Critics claim a hands-off approach can be detrimental, particularly during a bear market. An active manager can rotate between sectors to shield investors from periods of volatility. Conversely, a passive fund that seldom adapts to market conditions is forced to take the brunt of a drawdown.
Finally, another notable issue with passive ETFs is that many of the indices they track are capitalization-weighted. This means the larger the stock's market capitalization, the higher its weight in an investment portfolio. A drawback to this approach is that it reduces diversification and leaves passive ETFs weighted toward large stocks in the market.
What Is an Example of a Passive ETF?
The most well-known passive ETFs are those that track the S&P 500, but there are many others. Nearly all (if not all) broker-dealers offer passive ETFs.
Are ETFs Good for Passive Income?
It depends on your financial circumstances, how much you have invested in ETFs, and whether they pay dividends. Some ETFs might provide passive income given enough capital invested, but this depends on market conditions. Dividend ETFs can be a good passive income generator, but again, it depends on market conditions and how much you have invested and hold.
What Are the Disadvantages of ETF Investing?
ETFs are usually set up to mimic benchmark indexes. Many different indexes list the same companies, and ETFs can further concentrate a portfolio by weighting the better-performing companies higher. Weighting large-cap stocks in a portfolio exposes you to total market risk, and tracking an index gives the fund less flexibility if the market takes a downturn.
The Bottom Line
Passive ETFs are funds that purchase shares listed on benchmark indexes. They are popular among investors because they offer exposure to entire sectors or segments that many smaller investors could not fully access or mimic on their own due to costs.
The funds have several advantages, but they also have disadvantages. However, over the long-term, passively managed ETFs tend to outperform actively managed funds, so investors with long-term outlooks can benefit from the lower costs and diversity these funds offer.