Talk:Rhinox (Armada)

I assume this has already been discussed before, but shouldn't we have the events of "Fire in the Dark" listed here instead of Rhinox (BW) because it's an Armada story and not set in G1? Freakertron (talk) 22:02, 19 September 2015 (EDT)

Meh. Saix (talk) 22:21, 19 September 2015 (EDT)

Just something we try to not think about that hard? Freakertron (talk) 23:45, 26 September 2015 (EDT)

I would approve of such action. S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 (talk) 20:43, 28 September 2015 (EDT)

The Rhinox in "Fire in the Dark" may or may not be a Rhinox (Armada), but he isn't this Rhinox (Armada). They would be different characters, like Megatron and Megatron. - Gimmick (talk) 21:17, 28 September 2015 (EDT)

Well how do we know they aren't the same and are like the G1 and BW Megatrons? Personally I think it wouldn't hurt just to place it here because it is a Rhinox in an Armada story and AVP somewhat expanded on Armada's Beast Wars so we now know a little more about it. Besides, it could just be the result of different universes that are why they have different roles. I mean look at the cameo of SG Ravage in IDW, correct me if I'm wrong, you guys listed as whoever Ravage's color scheme was based off in G1 just because it was a G1 story. Isn't this a similar deal? Freakertron (talk) 03:04, 15 October 2015 (EDT)

I believe the way it was done for Fire in the Dark characters is that the information was placed on the Beast Wars characters' pages because Fire in the Dark describes Beast Wars cartoon-esque events. I'm not sure how much Fire in the Dark goes into detail about its Rhinox, but in all likelihood, Fire in the Dark Rhinox is a Primax-style Rhinox, not an Aurex-style Rhinox. S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 (talk) 01:07, 9 November 2015 (EST)