Tournaments for the endogenous allocating of prizes within workteams - Theory and experimental evidence
Matthias Sutter ()
Papers on Strategic Interaction from Max Planck Institute of Economics, Strategic Interaction Group
Abstract:
We present a model where compensation within a workteam is determined endogenously by the use of a rank-order tournament. Team members compete in their efforts for the right to propose the distribution of a prize within the team. The implementation of a proposal requires the approval of other team members. Failure to reach an agreement is costly and the role of proposer rotates in the order of members' efforts. We show in an experiment that tournaments elicit higher efforts than random determination of the proposer role. Proposers get a significantly larger share of the prize than non-proposers.
Keywords: Tournament; work incentives; teams; allocation of prizes; experiment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C72 C91 C92 J33 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 37 pages
Date: 2004-02
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dev and nep-exp
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
ftp://papers.econ.mpg.de/esi/discussionpapers/2004-10.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 500 Failed to connect to FTP server papers.econ.mpg.de: No such host is known.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:esi:discus:2004-10
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.econ.mpg. ... arch/ESI/discuss.php
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Papers on Strategic Interaction from Max Planck Institute of Economics, Strategic Interaction Group Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Karin Richter ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).