[go: up one dir, main page]

An Entity of Type: diocese, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

The Pratt-York opinion also known as the Camden-Yorke opinion was a 1757 official legal opinion issued jointly by Charles Pratt, 1st Earl Camden, the Attorney General for England and Wales, and Charles Yorke, the Solicitor General for England and Wales (and former counsel to the East India Company), regarding the legality of land purchases by the British East India Company from the rulers of the princely states in British India. In large part due to this opinion, India is one of the few common law jurisdiction which has rejected the doctrine of aboriginal title.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • The Pratt-York opinion also known as the Camden-Yorke opinion was a 1757 official legal opinion issued jointly by Charles Pratt, 1st Earl Camden, the Attorney General for England and Wales, and Charles Yorke, the Solicitor General for England and Wales (and former counsel to the East India Company), regarding the legality of land purchases by the British East India Company from the rulers of the princely states in British India. In large part due to this opinion, India is one of the few common law jurisdiction which has rejected the doctrine of aboriginal title. (en)
dbo:thumbnail
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 16018660 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 9350 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1037815478 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dct:subject
gold:hypernym
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • The Pratt-York opinion also known as the Camden-Yorke opinion was a 1757 official legal opinion issued jointly by Charles Pratt, 1st Earl Camden, the Attorney General for England and Wales, and Charles Yorke, the Solicitor General for England and Wales (and former counsel to the East India Company), regarding the legality of land purchases by the British East India Company from the rulers of the princely states in British India. In large part due to this opinion, India is one of the few common law jurisdiction which has rejected the doctrine of aboriginal title. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Pratt–Yorke opinion (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:depiction
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License