| dbo:abstract
|
- Carpenter v. United States, 138 S.Ct. 2206 (2018), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case concerning the privacy of historical cell site location information (CSLI). The Court held that the government violates the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution when it accesses historical CSLI records containing the physical locations of cellphones without a search warrant. Prior to Carpenter, government entities could obtain cellphone location records by claiming the information was required as part of an investigation. After Carpenter, government entities are required to obtain a search warrant to access that information. Recognizing the influence of new consumer communications devices in the 2010s, the Court expanded its conceptions of constitutional rights toward the privacy of this type of data. However, the Court emphasized that the Carpenter ruling was narrowly restricted to the precise types of information and search procedures that were relevant to Carpenter's complaint. (en)
- 卡本特訴美國案（Carpenter v. United States），是美國最高法院的一個里程碑式的判例，涉及（CSLI）的隱私問題。美國首席大法官約翰·羅伯茨提出的5–4判決之裁定，致法院認爲美國政府違反了美國憲法第四修正案，即因政府搜查了手機位置資訊的歷史記錄，其中也包含沒有搜查令的手機之實際位置資訊。 (zh)
|
| dbo:thumbnail
| |
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
| dbo:wikiPageID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 30152 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-11-29 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:argueyear
| |
| dbp:case
|
- Carpenter v. United States, (en)
|
| dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-06-22 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:decideyear
| |
| dbp:dissent
|
- Thomas (en)
- Kennedy (en)
- Alito (en)
- Gorsuch (en)
|
| dbp:docket
| |
| dbp:first
|
- James (en)
- Susan (en)
- Trevor (en)
- Stephen Wm. (en)
|
| dbp:fullname
|
- Timothy Ivory Carpenter v. United States of America (en)
|
| dbp:holding
|
- Government acquisition of cell-site records is a search under the Fourth Amendment, and, thus requires a warrant. (en)
|
| dbp:joindissent
|
- Thomas (en)
- Thomas, Alito (en)
|
| dbp:joinmajority
|
- Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan (en)
|
| dbp:journal
| |
| dbp:justia
| |
| dbp:last
|
- Knight (en)
- Smith (en)
- Burrus (en)
- Freiwald (en)
|
| dbp:litigants
|
- Carpenter v. United States (en)
|
| dbp:majority
| |
| dbp:opinionannouncement
| |
| dbp:oralargument
| |
| dbp:otherSource
| |
| dbp:otherUrl
| |
| dbp:oyez
| |
| dbp:page
|
- 79 (xsd:integer)
- 205 (xsd:integer)
|
| dbp:parallelcitations
| |
| dbp:prior
| |
| dbp:title
|
- The Supreme Court, 2017 Term — Comment: The Carpenter Chronicle: A Near-Perfect Surveillance (en)
- Katz Nipped and Katz Cradled: Carpenter and the Evolving Fourth Amendment (en)
|
| dbp:url
|
- https://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/serials/files/supreme-court-review/2018/9/2018-cato-supreme-court-review-4.pdf| year=2018 (en)
- https://harvardlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/205-235_Online.pdf| year=2018 (en)
|
| dbp:uspage
| |
| dbp:usvol
| |
| dbp:volume
|
- 132 (xsd:integer)
- 2017 (xsd:integer)
|
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dct:subject
| |
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:comment
|
- 卡本特訴美國案（Carpenter v. United States），是美國最高法院的一個里程碑式的判例，涉及（CSLI）的隱私問題。美國首席大法官約翰·羅伯茨提出的5–4判決之裁定，致法院認爲美國政府違反了美國憲法第四修正案，即因政府搜查了手機位置資訊的歷史記錄，其中也包含沒有搜查令的手機之實際位置資訊。 (zh)
- Carpenter v. United States, 138 S.Ct. 2206 (2018), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case concerning the privacy of historical cell site location information (CSLI). The Court held that the government violates the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution when it accesses historical CSLI records containing the physical locations of cellphones without a search warrant. (en)
|
| rdfs:label
|
- Carpenter v. United States (en)
- 卡本特訴美國案 (zh)
|
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:depiction
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| foaf:name
|
- (en)
- Timothy Ivory Carpenter v. United States of America (en)
|
| is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |