| dbo:abstract
|
- Michigan v. Jackson ist ein am Obersten Gerichtshof der Vereinigten Staaten verhandelter Fall zur Frage, ob Aussagen einer Verdachtsperson ohne Beisein eines Anwalts in einer auf Initiative der Polizei begonnenen Befragung gerichtlich verwertbar sind, wenn sich diese Person zu einem früheren Zeitpunkt bereits auf ihr im 6. Zusatzartikel festgeschriebenes Recht auf einen Anwalt berufen hat. (de)
- Michigan v. Jackson, 475 U.S. 625 (1986), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court regarding the Sixth Amendment's right to counsel in a police interrogation. In a decision written by Justice Stevens, the Court held that once an accused individual has claimed a right to counsel at a plea hearing or other court proceeding, a waiver of that right during later police questioning would be invalid unless the accused individual initiated the communication. This decision was overruled by the Supreme Court in Montejo v. Louisiana, by a 5–4 vote. (en)
|
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
| dbo:wikiPageID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 15002 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-12-09 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:argueyear
| |
| dbp:case
|
- Michigan v. Jackson, (en)
|
| dbp:concurrence
| |
| dbp:courtlistener
| |
| dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-04-01 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:decideyear
| |
| dbp:dissent
| |
| dbp:fullname
|
- Michigan v. Robert Bernard Jackson; Michigan v. Rudy Bladel (en)
|
| dbp:googlescholar
| |
| dbp:holding
|
- The Sixth Amendment right to counsel requires that if police initiate an interrogation after a defendant's assertion of his right to counsel at an arraignment or similar proceeding, any waiver of that right for that police-initiated interrogation is invalid. (en)
|
| dbp:joindissent
| |
| dbp:joinmajority
|
- Brennan, White, Marshall, Blackmun (en)
|
| dbp:justia
| |
| dbp:lawsapplied
| |
| dbp:litigants
| |
| dbp:loc
| |
| dbp:majority
| |
| dbp:oralargument
| |
| dbp:oyez
| |
| dbp:parallelcitations
| |
| dbp:prior
| |
| dbp:uspage
| |
| dbp:usvol
| |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dcterms:subject
| |
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:comment
|
- Michigan v. Jackson ist ein am Obersten Gerichtshof der Vereinigten Staaten verhandelter Fall zur Frage, ob Aussagen einer Verdachtsperson ohne Beisein eines Anwalts in einer auf Initiative der Polizei begonnenen Befragung gerichtlich verwertbar sind, wenn sich diese Person zu einem früheren Zeitpunkt bereits auf ihr im 6. Zusatzartikel festgeschriebenes Recht auf einen Anwalt berufen hat. (de)
- Michigan v. Jackson, 475 U.S. 625 (1986), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court regarding the Sixth Amendment's right to counsel in a police interrogation. In a decision written by Justice Stevens, the Court held that once an accused individual has claimed a right to counsel at a plea hearing or other court proceeding, a waiver of that right during later police questioning would be invalid unless the accused individual initiated the communication. This decision was overruled by the Supreme Court in Montejo v. Louisiana, by a 5–4 vote. (en)
|
| rdfs:label
|
- Michigan v. Jackson (de)
- Michigan v. Jackson (en)
|
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| foaf:name
|
- (en)
- Michigan v. Robert Bernard Jackson; Michigan v. Rudy Bladel (en)
|
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |