[go: up one dir, main page]
create a website
Graph literacy matters: Examining the association between graph literacy, health literacy, and numeracy in a Medicaid eligible population. (2020). Mancini, Julien ; Elwyn, Glyn ; Omalley, James ; Yen, Renata W ; Durand, Marie-Anne.
In: PLOS ONE.
RePEc:plo:pone00:0241844.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 2

Citations received by this document

Cites: 45

References cited by this document

Cocites: 27

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Current Challenges When Using Numbers in Patient Decision Aids: Advanced Concepts. (2021). Zikmund-Fisher, Brian J ; Timmermans, Danielle ; Ozanne, Elissa ; Gaissmaier, Wolfgang ; Peters, Ellen ; Okan, Yasmina ; Bonner, Carissa ; Trevena, Lyndal J.
    In: Medical Decision Making.
    RePEc:sae:medema:v:41:y:2021:i:7:p:834-847.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Alam S, Elwyn G, Percac Lima S, Grande SW, Durand MA. Assessing the acceptability and feasibility of encounter decision aids for early stage breast cancer targeted at underserved patients. BMC medical informatics and decision making. 2016; 16(1):147. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-016-0384-2 PMID:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Aldrich FK. Graphicacy: the fourth ‘R’. Prim Sci Rev. 2000; 21:382–90.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Ancker JS, Senathirajah Y, Kukafka R, Starren JB. Design features of graphs in health risk communication: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006; 13(6):608–18. https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia. M2115 PMID: 16929039
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Baker GC, Newton DE, Bergstresser PR. Increased readability improves the comprehension of written information for patients with skin disease. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1988; 19(6):1135–41. https://doi.org/
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Brown SM, Culver JO, Osann KE, MacDonald DJ, Sand S, Thornton AA, et al. Health literacy, numeracy, and interpretation of graphical breast cancer risk estimates. Patient education and counseling. 2011; 83(1):92–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2010.04.027 PMID: 20554149
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Carey G, Crammond B, De Leeuw E. Towards health equity: a framework for the application of proportionate universalism. Int J Equity Health. 2015; 14:81.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Chew LD, Griffin JM, Partin MR, Noorbaloochi S, Grill JP, Snyder A, et al. Validation of screening questions for limited health literacy in a large VA outpatient population. J Gen Intern Med. 2008; 23(5):561–
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Eysenbach G. Improving the quality of Web surveys: the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet ESurveys (CHERRIES). J Med Internet Res. 2004; 6(3):e34. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6.3.e34 PMID:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  9. Fagerlin A, Wang C, Ubel PA. Reducing the influence of anecdotal reasoning on people’s health care decisions: is a picture worth a thousand statistics? Med Decis Making. 2005; 25(4):398–405.

  10. Fagerlin A, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Ubel PA, Jankovic A, Derry HA, Smith DM. Measuring numeracy without a math test: development of the Subjective Numeracy Scale. Med Decis Making. 2007; 27(5):672–

  11. Feldman-Stewart D, Kocovski N, McConnell BA, Brundage MD, Mackillop WJ. Perception of quantitative information for treatment decisions. Med Decis Making. 2000; 20(2):228–38. https://doi.org/10. 1177/0272989X0002000208 PMID: 10772360

  12. Friel S, Curcio F, GW B. Making sense of graphs: Critical factors infleuencing comprehension and instructional implications. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 2001; 32(2):124–58.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Gaissmaier W, Wegwarth O, Skopec D, Muller AS, Broschinski S, Politi MC. Numbers can be worth a thousand pictures: individual differences in understanding graphical and numerical representations of PLOS ONE Graph literacy in a Medicaid eligible population PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241844 November 11, 2020 13 / health-related information. Health Psychol. 2012; 31(3):286–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024850 PMID: 21842998
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Galesic M, Garcia-Retamero R, Gigerenzer G. Using icon arrays to communicate medical risks: overcoming low numeracy. Health Psychol. 2009; 28(2):210–6. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014474 PMID: 19290713
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Galesic M, Garcia-Retamero R. Graph literacy: a cross-cultural comparison. Med Decis Making. 2011; 31(3):444–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X10373805 PMID: 20671213
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Galesic M, Garcia-Retamero R. Statistical numeracy for health: a cross-cultural comparison with probabilistic national samples. Archives of internal medicine. 2010; 170(5):462–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/ archinternmed.2009.481 PMID: 20212183
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Garcia-Retamero R, Cokely ET. Effective communication of risks to young adults: using message framing and visual aids to increase condom use and STD screening. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2011; 17(3):270–
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  18. Garcia-Retamero R, Galesic M, Gigerenzer G. Do icon arrays help reduce denominator neglect? Med Decis Making. 2010; 30(6):672–84.

  19. Garcia-Retamero R, Galesic M. Communicating treatment risk reduction to people with low numeracy skills: a cross-cultural comparison. American journal of public health. 2009; 99(12):2196–202. https:// doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.160234 PMID: 19833983

  20. Garcia-Retamero R, Galesic M. How to reduce the effect of framing on messages about health. J Gen Intern Med. 2010; 25(12):1323–9.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  21. Gurmankin AD, Helweg-Larsen M, Armstrong K, Kimmel SE, Volpp KG. Comparing the standard rating scale and the magnifier scale for assessing risk perceptions. Med Decis Making. 2005; 25(5):560–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X05280560 PMID: 16160211

  22. Jacobson TA, Thomas DM, Morton FJ, Offutt G, Shevlin J, Ray S. Use of a low-literacy patient education tool to enhance pneumococcal vaccination rates. A randomized controlled trial. Jama. 1999; 282 (7):646–50. PLOS ONE Graph literacy in a Medicaid eligible population PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241844 November 11, 2020 12 / 5. Wallace AS, Seligman HK, Davis TC, Schillinger D, Arnold CL, Bryant-Shilliday B, et al. Literacy-appropriate educational materials and brief counseling improve diabetes self-management. Patient education and counseling. 2009; 75(3):328–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2008.12.017 PMID: 19167857
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Koh HK, Brach C, Harris LM, Parchman ML. A proposed ’health literate care model’ would constitute a systems approach to improving patients’ engagement in care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013; 32(2):357–
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Koo K, Brackett CD, Eisenberg EH, Kieffer KA, Hyams ES. Impact of numeracy on understanding of prostate cancer risk reduction in PSA screening. PLoS One. 2017; 12(12):e0190357. https://doi.org/10. 1371/journal.pone.0190357 PMID: 29284055
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Kutner M, Greenberg E., Jin Y., Paulsen C. The Health Literacy of America’s Adults: Results From the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy. Washington D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics; 2006.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Lipkus IM, Hollands JG. The visual communication of risk. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1999(25):149–63.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  27. Lipkus IM, Samsa G, Rimer BK. General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Medical decision making: an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making. 2001; 21(1):37–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X0102100105 PMID: 11206945

  28. McNaughton C, Wallston KA, Rothman RL, Marcovitz DE, Storrow AB. Short, subjective measures of numeracy and general health literacy in an adult emergency department. Academic emergency medicine: official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. 2011; 18(11):1148–55.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  29. McNaughton CD, Cavanaugh KL, Kripalani S, Rothman RL, Wallston KA. Validation of a Short, 3-Item Version of the Subjective Numeracy Scale. Med Decis Making. 2015; 35(8):932–6. https://doi.org/10. 1177/0272989X15581800 PMID: 25878195

  30. Nayak JG, Hartzler AL, Macleod LC, Izard JP, Dalkin BM, Gore JL. Relevance of graph literacy in the development of patient-centered communication tools. Patient Educ Couns. 2016; 99(3):448–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2015.09.009 PMID: 26481910
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Nelson W, Reyna VF, Fagerlin A, Lipkus I, Peters E. Clinical implications of numeracy: theory and practice. Ann Behav Med. 2008; 35(3):261–74.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  32. Okan Y, Janssen E, Galesic M, Waters EA. Using the Short Graph Literacy Scale to Predict Precursors of Health Behavior Change. Med Decis Making. 2019; 39(3):183–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0272989X19829728 PMID: 30845893

  33. Parker RM. What an informed patient means for the future of healthcare. Pharmacoeconomics. 2006; 24 Suppl 2:29–33. https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200624002-00004 PMID: 23389486

  34. Pedersen MJ, Nielsen CV. Improving Survey Response Rates in Online Panels: Effects of Low-Cost Incentives and Cost-Free Text Appeal Interventions. Social Science Computer Review. 2016; 34(2).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. PLOS ONE Graph literacy in a Medicaid eligible population PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241844 November 11, 2020 14 /
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Reyna VF, Nelson WL, Han PK, Dieckmann NF. How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making. Psychol Bull. 2009; 135(6):943–73. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017327 PMID:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Rolison JJ, Wood S, Hanoch Y, Liu PJ. Subjective numeracy scale as a tool for assessing statistical numeracy in older adult populations. Gerontology. 2013; 59(3):283–8. https://doi.org/10.1159/ 000345797 PMID: 23391745
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Scalia P, O’Malley AJ, Durand MA, Goodney PP, Elwyn G. Presenting time-based risks of stroke and death for Patients facing carotid stenosis treatment options: Patients prefer pie charts over icon arrays. Patient Educ Couns. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2019.05.004 PMID: 31101429
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Black WC, Welch HG. The role of numeracy in understanding the benefit of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med. 1997; 127(11):966–72. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819127 -11-199712010-00003 PMID: 9412301
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Sheridan SL, Pignone M. Numeracy and the medical student’s ability to interpret data. Eff Clin Pract. 2002; 5(1):35–40. PMID: 11874195
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. Spence I. No humble pie: the origins and usage of a statistical chart. J Educ Behav Stat. 2005; 30:353–
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Tourangeau R, Couper MP, Steiger DM. Humanizing self-administered surveys: experiments on social presence in web and IVR surveys. Computers in Human Behavior. 2003; 19(1):1–24.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Trevena LJ, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Edwards A, Gaissmaier W, Galesic M, Han PK, et al. Presenting quantitative information about decision outcomes: a risk communication primer for patient decision aid developers. BMC medical informatics and decision making. 2013; 13 Suppl 2:S7.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  44. Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Smith DM, Ubel PA, Fagerlin A. Validation of the Subjective Numeracy Scale: effects of low numeracy on comprehension of risk communications and utility elicitations. Med Decis Making. 2007; 27(5):663–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X07303824 PMID: 17652180

  45. Zipkin DA, Umscheid CA, Keating NL, Allen E, Aung K, Beyth R, et al. Evidence-based risk communication: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2014; 161(4):270–80.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. In medio stat virtus? Effective communication and preferences for redistribution in hard times. (2023). Rosso, Anna Cecilia ; Morelli, Massimo ; Grembi, Veronica ; Bertoli, Paola.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:214:y:2023:i:c:p:105-147.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Information availability and ability choice in a market for physicians. (2022). Rodriguezcamacho, Javier A ; Cordova, Edgardo Lara.
    In: Metroeconomica.
    RePEc:bla:metroe:v:73:y:2022:i:1:p:245-267.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. The impact of public health messaging and personal experience on the acceptance of mask wearing during the COVID-19 pandemic. (2021). Murphy, James ; James, Alexander G ; Cherry, Todd L.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:187:y:2021:i:c:p:415-430.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Graph literacy matters: Examining the association between graph literacy, health literacy, and numeracy in a Medicaid eligible population. (2020). Mancini, Julien ; Elwyn, Glyn ; Omalley, James ; Yen, Renata W ; Durand, Marie-Anne.
    In: PLOS ONE.
    RePEc:plo:pone00:0241844.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Visualizations of Projected Rainfall Change in the United Kingdom: An Interview Study about User Perceptions. (2020). Fung, Fai ; de Bruin, Wandi Bruine ; Kause, Astrid ; Lowe, Jason ; Taylor, Andrea.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:7:p:2955-:d:342652.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. How do subjective life expectancies compare with mortality tables? Similarities and differences in three national samples. (2020). Douglas, E ; Comerford, D A ; Bell, D. N. F., .
    In: The Journal of the Economics of Ageing.
    RePEc:eee:joecag:v:16:y:2020:i:c:s2212828x20300062.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Estimating everyday risk: Subjective judgments are related to objective risk, mapping of numerical magnitudes and previous experience. (2018). Loetscher, Tobias.
    In: PLOS ONE.
    RePEc:plo:pone00:0207356.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Designing Graphs to Communicate Risks: Understanding How the Choice of Graphical Format Influences Decision Making. (2017). Gibson, Jacqueline Macdonald ; Boker, Emily M ; Wilkins, Abigail M ; de Bruin, Wndi Bruine ; Stone, Eric R.
    In: Risk Analysis.
    RePEc:wly:riskan:v:37:y:2017:i:4:p:612-628.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Does Iconicity in Pictographs Matter? The Influence of Iconicity and Numeracy on Information Processing, Decision Making, and Liking in an Eye‐Tracking Study. (2017). Keller, Carmen ; Siegrist, Michael ; Kreuzmair, Christina.
    In: Risk Analysis.
    RePEc:wly:riskan:v:37:y:2017:i:3:p:546-556.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. When Experience Meets Description: How Dyads Integrate Experiential and Descriptive Information in Risky Decisions. (2017). Muller-Trede, Johannes ; Lejarraga, Tomas.
    In: Management Science.
    RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:63:y:2017:i:6:p:1953-1971.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. High Numerates Count Icons and Low Numerates Process Large Areas in Pictographs: Results of an Eye‐Tracking Study. (2016). Keller, Carmen ; Siegrist, Michael ; Kreuzmair, Christina.
    In: Risk Analysis.
    RePEc:wly:riskan:v:36:y:2016:i:8:p:1599-1614.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Doctor–patient differences in risk and time preferences: A field experiment. (2016). van der Pol, Marjon ; Miraldo, Marisa ; Galizzi, Matteo ; Stavropoulou, Charitini.
    In: Journal of Health Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jhecon:v:50:y:2016:i:c:p:171-182.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Does playing the serious game B-SaFe! make citizens more aware of man-made and natural risks in their environment?. (2015). Cremers, Anita ; Kerstholt, Jose ; Roelofs, Maaike ; van der Beek, Dolf ; Stubbe, Hester .
    In: Journal of Risk Research.
    RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:18:y:2015:i:10:p:1280-1292.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. The narrative bias revisited: What drives the biasing influence of narrative information on risk perceptions?. (2015). Betsch, Cornelia ; Schmid, Philipp ; Renkewitz, Frank ; Haase, Niels .
    In: Judgment and Decision Making.
    RePEc:jdm:journl:v:10:y:2015:i:3:p:241-264.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. The Measurement of Subjective Probability: Evaluating the Sensitivity and Accuracy of Various Scales. (2013). Betsch, Cornelia ; Renkewitz, Frank ; Haase, Niels .
    In: Risk Analysis.
    RePEc:wly:riskan:v:33:y:2013:i:10:p:1812-1828.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Visual representation of statistical information improves diagnostic inferences in doctors and their patients. (2013). Garcia-Retamero, Rocio ; Hoffrage, Ulrich .
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:83:y:2013:i:c:p:27-33.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. The impact of anecdotal data in regulatory audit firm inspection reports. (2013). Piercey, David M. ; Kida, Thomas ; Wainberg, James S. ; Smith, James F..
    In: Accounting, Organizations and Society.
    RePEc:eee:aosoci:v:38:y:2013:i:8:p:621-636.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Affect-inducing risk communication: current knowledge and future directions. (2012). Jardine, C. G. ; V. H. M. Visschers, ; Kurzenhauser, S. ; Seidl, R. ; Wiedemann, P. M. ; Gutscher, H. ; D. R. M. Timmermans, .
    In: Journal of Risk Research.
    RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:15:y:2012:i:3:p:257-271.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Comprehension of Graphs and Tables Depend on the Task: Empirical Evidence from Two Web-Based Studies. (2012). Ellen, Peters ; Matthias, Schonlau .
    In: Statistics, Politics and Policy.
    RePEc:bpj:statpp:v:3:y:2012:i:2:p:35:n:4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Making Benefit Transfers Work: Deriving and Testing Principles for Value Transfers for Similar and Dissimilar Sites Using a Case Study of the Non-Market Benefits of Water Quality Improvements Across E. (2011). Schaafsma, Marije ; Navrud, Stale ; Ferrini, Silvia ; Brouwer, Roy ; Bateman, Ian ; Semnien, D. ; Barton, D. ; Hasler, B. ; Hime, S. ; Dubgaard, A. ; eponaviit, R. ; De Nocker, L. ; Liekens, I..
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:50:y:2011:i:3:p:365-387.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download

  22. Becoming a bad doctor. (2011). Szech, Nora.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:80:y:2011:i:1:p:244-257.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Who proficts from visual aids: Overcoming challenges in peoples understanding of risks. (2010). Galesic, Mirta ; Garcia-Retamero, Rocio .
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:70:y:2010:i:7:p:1019-1025.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. A dialogic model of conversations about risk: Coordinating perceptions and achieving quality decisions in cancer care. (2009). Collins, Dorothy L. ; Street, Richard L..
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:68:y:2009:i:8:p:1506-1512.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Do Colored Photographs Affect Willingness to Pay Responses for Endangered Species Conservation?. (2008). Francisco, Herminia.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:40:y:2008:i:2:p:251-264.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Does narrative information bias individuals decision making? A systematic review. (2008). Mooney, Andrew ; Conner, Mark ; Bekker, Hilary L. ; Winterbottom, Anna .
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:67:y:2008:i:12:p:2079-2088.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Hedonic adaptation and the role of decision and experience utility in public policy. (2008). Loewenstein, George ; Ubel, Peter A..
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:92:y:2008:i:8-9:p:1795-1810.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2024-12-23 08:24:51 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.