Apergis N, Cooray A. How do human rights violations affect poverty and income distribution? International Economics. 2020; 161: 56–65.
- Aspinall E. Semi-Opponents in power: The Abdurrahman Wahid and Megawati Soekarnoputri presidencies. In: Aspinall E, Fealy G (Eds.) Soeharto’s New Order and its Legacy: Essays in honour of Harold Crouch. ANU E Press; 2010.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Barton G. Indonesia’s difficult transition and President Abdurrahman Wahid. Pacifica Review: Peace, Security & Global change. 2001; 13(3): 273–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/13239100120082747
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Baum L. Implementation of judicial decisions: An organizational analysis. American Politics Quarterly. 1976; 4(1): 86–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X7600400104
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bormann NC, Golder M. Democratic electoral systems around the world, 1946–2011. Electoral Studies. 2013; 32(2): 360–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2013.01.005
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Burbank SB, Friedman B. Reconsidering judicial independence. In: Burbank SB, Friedman B (Eds.) Judicial Independence at the Crossroads: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Sage; 2002. PLOS ONE The effect of copartisan justice ministers on human rights in presidential democracies PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234938 September 2, 2020 14 / 13. Domingo P. Judicial independence: The politics of the Supreme Court in Mexico. Journal of Latin American Studies. 2000; 32(3): 705–735. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X00005885
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Calhoun FS. Westering and the Law. Wyoming Law Review. 2001; 1(2): 603–622.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Canon BC, Johnson CA. Judicial Policies: Implementation and Impact. CQ Press; 1999.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- ChaÌvez RB. The rule of law and courts in democratizing regimes. In: Whittington KE, Kelemen RD, Caldeira GA (Eds.) Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics. Oxford University Press; 1998.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Cheibub JA, Gandhi J, Vreeland JR. Democracy and dictatorship revisited. Public Choice. 2010; 143 (1–2): 67–101.
Cingranelli D, Fajardo-Heyward P, Filippov M. Principals, agents and human rights. British Journal of Political Science. 2014; 44(3): 605–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123413000070
Cingranelli D, Filippov M. Are Human Rights Practices Improving? American Political Science Review. 2018; 112(4): 1083–9. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055418000254
- Cingranelli D, Filippov M. Electoral rules and incentives to protect human rights. The Journal of Politics. 2010; 72(1): 243–57. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381609990594
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Cingranelli D, Filippov M. Path dependence and human rights improvement. Journal of Human Rights. 2020; 19(1): 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2019.1671178
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Cingranelli D, Filippov M. Problems of model specification and improper data extrapolation. British Journal of Political Science. 2018; 48(1): 273–4. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712341500071X
- Cingranelli DL, Kalmick C. Is Religion the Enemy of Human Rights? Human Rights Quarterly. 2019; 41 (3): 725–52. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2019.0050
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Cingranelli DL, Richards DL, Clay KC. The Cingranelli-Richards (CIRI Index) Human Rights Dataset, Version 2014.04.14. Available at: http://www.humanrightsdata.com/p/data-documentation.html.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Cingranelli DL, Richards DL. The Cingranelli and Richards (CIRI Index) human rights data project. Human Rights Quarterly. 2010; 32: 401–424. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.0.0141
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Clark AM, Sikkink K. Information effects and human rights data: Is the good news about increased human rights information bad news for human rights measures? Human Rights Quarterly. 2013; 35(3): 539–68. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2013.0046
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Coppedge M, Gerring J, Knutsen CH, Lindberg SI, Teorell J, Altman D, et al. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project, v10. Available at: https://doi.org/10.23696/vdemds20. PLOS ONE The effect of copartisan justice ministers on human rights in presidential democracies PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234938 September 2, 2020 16 / 66. Cope KL, Crabtree C, Fariss CJ. Patterns of disagreement in indicators of state repression. Political Science Research and Methods. 2020; 8: 178–187. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2018.62
- Crabtree CD, Fariss CJ. Uncovering patterns among latent variables: Human rights and de facto judicial independence. Research & Politics. 2015; 2(3): 1–9.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Crabtree CD, Nelson MJ. New evidence for a positive relationship between de facto judicial independence and state respect for empowerment rights. International Studies Quarterly. 2017; 61(1): 210–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqw056
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Cross FB. The relevance of law in human rights protection. International Review of Law and Economics. 1999; 19(1): 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8188(98)00028-3
- De Mesquita BB, Downs GW, Smith A, Cherif FM. Thinking inside the box: A closer look at democracy and human rights. International Studies Quarterly. 2005; 49(3): 439–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14682478.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Dodson M, Jackson DW. Judicial independence and instability in Central America. In: Russell PH, O’Brien DM (Eds.) Judicial Independence in the Age of Democracy. University of Virginia Press; 2001.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Doyle D, Elgie R. Maximizing the reliability of cross-national measures of presidential power. British Journal of Political Science. 2016; 46(4): 731–41. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123414000465
- Drury AC, Peksen D. Women and economic statecraft: The negative impact international economic sanctions visit on women. European Journal of International Relations. 2014; 20(2): 463–90. https:// doi.org/10.1177/1354066112448200
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Epp CR. The Rights Revolution: Activists and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. University of Chicago Press; 1998.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Fariss CJ. Respect for human rights has improved over time: Modeling the changing standard of accountability. American Political Science Review. 2014; 108(2): 297–318. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0003055414000070
Feld LP, Voigt S. Economic growth and judicial independence: cross-country evidence using a new set of indicators. European Journal of Political Economy. 2003; 19(3): 497–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0176-2680(03)00017-X
- Finkelman P. “Hooted Down the Page of Historyâ€: Reconsidering The Greatness of Chief Justice Taney. Journal of Supreme Court History. 1994; 19(1): 83–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5818.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Gibney M, Cornett L, Wood R, Haschke P, Arnon D, Pisanò A, Barrett G. The Political Terror Scale, 1976-2018. Available at: http://www.politicalterrorscale.org.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Gibney M. Courts as “teachers in a vital national seminar†on human rights. In: Gibney M (Ed.) World Justice: U.S. Courts and International Human Rights. Westview Press; 1991.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Gwartney J, Lawson R, Sobel RS, Leeson PT. Economic Freedom of the World: 2007 Annual Report. Fraser Institute; 2007.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Hafner-Burton EM, Hyde SD, Jablonski RS. When do governments resort to election violence? British Journal of Political Science. 2014; 44(1): 149–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123412000671
Hafner-Burton EM. Trading human rights: How preferential trade agreements influence government repression. International Organization. 2005; 59(3): 593–629.
- Haggard S, MacIntyre A, Tiede L. The rule of law and economic development. Annual Review of Political Science. 2008; 11(1): 205–234. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.081205.100244
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hamilton A. Federalist no. 78. In: Genovese MA (Ed.) The Federalist Papers: Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay. Palgrave Macmillan; 2009.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Haschke P, Gibney M. Are Global Human Rights Conditions Static or Improving? In: Backer DA, Bhavnani R, Huth PK (Eds.) Peace and Conflict 2017. Routledge; 2017.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hellmeier S, Weidmann NB. Pulling the strings? The strategic use of pro-government mobilization in authoritarian regimes. Comparative Political Studies. 2020; 53(1): 71–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Herron ES and Randazzo KA. The relationship between independence and judicial review in post-communist courts. The Journal of Politics. 2003; 65(2): 422–438. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.t01-300007
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Holzer J. Democratic presidential elections and human rights: Does a runoff round reduce repression? The International Journal of Human Rights. 2018; 22(8): 1087–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Holzer J. Measuring presidential centrism and its effect on repression: Does ideology influence whether democratic governments respect human rights? Political Science. 2018; 70(3): 253–64. https://doi.org/
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Holzer J. Nationalism and human rights: A replication and extension. PLOS ONE. 2020; 14(8): 1–9.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Holzer J. Reevaluating the presidential runoff rule: Does a provision promote the protection of human rights? PLOS ONE. 2019; 14(5): 1–11.
- Holzer J. The perils of plurality rule and the major(itarian) effect of cabinet composition on human rights in presidential democracies. Research & Politics. 2018; 5(3): 1–8.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Holzer J. When justice answers to the president: Reexamining the effect of cabinet partisanship on human rights in presidential democracies. The Social Science Journal. 2020; 1–10.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Howard RM and Carey HF. Is an independent judiciary necessary for democracy? Judicature. 2004; 87 (6): 284–290.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Johnson CA. Judicial decisions and organizational change: Some theoretical and empirical notes on state court decisions and state administrative agencies. Law and Society Review. 1979; 14(1): 27–56. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053108
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Johnson JC, Souva M, Smith DL. Market-protecting institutions and the world trade organization’s ability to promote trade. International Studies Quarterly. 2013; 57(2): 410–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Katzmann RA. Judicial intervention and organization theory: Changing bureaucratic behavior and policy source. Yale Law Journal. 1980; 89(3): 513–37. https://doi.org/10.2307/795893
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Keith LC. Constitutional provisions for individual human rights: Are they more than mere “window dressing ?†Political Research Quarterly. 2002; 55(1): 111–43. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088068
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Keith LC. Judicial independence and human rights protection around the world. Judicature. 2002; 85 (4): 195–200.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Keith LC. Political Repression: Courts and the Law. University of Pennsylvania Press; 2012.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Kurniawan Y. The Politics of Securitization in Democratic Indonesia. Palgrave Macmillan; 2018.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Linzer DA, Staton JK. A global measure of judicial independence, 1948–2012. Journal of Law and Courts. 2015; 3(2): 223–56. https://doi.org/10.1086/682150
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Marshall MG, Gurr TR, Jaggers K. olity IV: Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800-2013 dataset user’s manual. Center for Systemic Peace; 2014.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Marshall MG, Gurr TR,and Jaggers K. Polity IV: Political regime characteristics and transitions, 18002004. Center for Systemic Peace; 2010.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Melton J and Ginsburg T. Does de jure judicial independence really matter? A reevaluation of explanations for judicial independence. Journal of Law and Courts. 2014; 2(2): 187–217. https://doi.org/10. 1086/676999
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Moreno E, Crisp BF, Shugart MS. The accountability deficit in Latin America. In: Mainwaring S, Welna C (Eds.) Democratic Accountability in Latin America. Oxford University Press; 2003.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Peerenboom R. An empirical overview of rights performance in Asia, France, and the USA: The dominance of wealth in the interplay of economics, culture, law, and governance. In: Peerenboom R, Petersen CJ, Chen AHY (Eds.) Human Rights in Asia: A Comparative Legal Study of Twelve Asian Jurisdictions, France and the USA. Routledge; 2006.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Pettersson T, Wallensteen P. Armed conflicts, 1946–2014. Journal of Peace Research. 2015; 52(4): 536–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343315595927
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- PLOS ONE The effect of copartisan justice ministers on human rights in presidential democracies PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234938 September 2, 2020 15 / 39. Magliocca GN. Preemptive Opinions: The Secret History of Worcester v. Georgia and Dred Scott. University of Pittsburgh Law Review. 2002; 63(3): 487–587.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Poe SC, Tate CN, Keith LC. Repression of the human right to personal integrity revisited: A global cross-national study covering the years 1976–1993. International Studies Quarterly. 1999; 43(2): 291–
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Poe SC, Tate CN. Repression of human rights to personal integrity in the 1980s: A global analysis. American Political Science Review. 1994; 88(4): 853–72. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082712
- Political Risk Services Group. International Country Risk Guide: Researcher’s Dataset. The PRS Group; 2013.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
RıÌos-Figueroa J and Staton JK. An evaluation of cross-national measures of judicial independence. The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization. 2014; 30(1): 104–137. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ ews029
- Richards DL, Gelleny RD. Good things to those who wait? National elections and government respect for human rights. Journal of Peace Research. 2007; 44(4): 505–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Richards DL, Webb A, Clay KC. Respect for physical-integrity rights in the twenty-first century: Evaluating Poe and Tate’s model 20 years later. Journal of Human Rights. 2015; 14(3): 291–311. https://doi. org/10.1080/14754835.2015.1061423
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Rosenthal AJ. Afterward. In: Henkin L, Rosenthal AJ (Eds.) Constitutionalism and Rights: The Influence of the United States Constitution Abroad. Columbia University Press; 1990.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Samuels DJ, Shugart MS. Presidents, Parties, and Prime Ministers: How the Separation of Powers Affects Party Organization and Behavior. Cambridge University Press; 2010.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Schlesinger AM. The Age of Jackson. Boston: Little, Brown; 1945.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Shapiro FR. The Yale Book of Quotations. Yale University Press; 2006.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Shapiro MM. The Supreme Court and Administrative Agencies. Free Press; 1968.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Spriggs JF. The Supreme Court and federal administrative agencies: A resource-based theory and analysis of judicial impact. American Journal of Political Science. 1996; 40(4): 1122–1151. https://doi. org/10.2307/2111745
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Staton JK, Linzer DA, Reenock C, Holsinger J Update, A global measure of judicial independence, 1900-2015. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/NFXWUO.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Supreme Court of the United States Worcester v. Georgia. 31 US (6 Pet) 515; 1832. Available at: https://www.loc.gov/item/usrep031515/.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Toma EF. Congressional influence and the Supreme Court: The budget as a signaling device. The Journal of Legal Studies. 1991; 20(1): 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1086/467882
Tomz M, Whittenberg J, King G. Clarify: Software for interpreting and presenting statistical results. Journal of Statistical Software. 2003; 8(1): 1–30.
- Tufte ER. Data Analysis for Politics and Policy. Prentice Hall; 1974.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Volcansek M, Lockhart C. Explaining support for human rights protections: A judicial role? Journal of Human Rights. 2012; 11(1): 33–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2012.648149 PLOS ONE The effect of copartisan justice ministers on human rights in presidential democracies PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234938 September 2, 2020 17 /
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Wood RM, Gibney M. The Political Terror Scale (PTS): A re-introduction and a comparison to CIRI Index. Human Rights Quarterly. 2010; 32: 367–400. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.0.0152
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
World Bank. World Development Indicators, 1960-2014. Available at: https://datacatalog.worldbank. org/dataset/world-development-indicators.